and Future Pharm.D. Candidate, Class of 2015 University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy September 3, 2014 Background
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) have increasingly been associated with drug-resistant pathogens
Vancomycin has been the cornerstone for MRSA infections Currently, there are a few drugs that are FDA approved for complicated SSSIs caused by MRSA Resistant strains have been reported The newly approved oxazolidinone, tedizolid, may be used as an alternative
Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: 2014 Update Stevens DL, et al. IDSA Practice Guidelines for SSTIs. 2014. Drug Dosing Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses IV Linezolid 600 mg every 12 h IV or 600 mg BID PO Clindamycin 600 mg every 8 h IV or 300450 mg QID PO Daptomycin 4 mg/kg every 24 h IV Ceftaroline 600 mg BID IV Doxycycline, minocycline 100 mg BID PO Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim 1-2 DS tabs BID PO MRSA SSTI Tedizolid (Sivextro) MOA: A prodrug that once converted in vivo will interact with the 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of the 50S subunit to inhibit translation
Activity against gram-positive pathogens, including linezolid-resistant S. aureus
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics o Oral bioavailability ~91% o Protein binding 70-90% o t 1/2 ~12 hours o AUC:MIC
Metabolism Tedizolid phosphate is converted by phosphatases to tedizolid (active) Excretion Inactive sulfate conjugated in feces (82%) and urine (18%) Perceived Benefits of Tedizolid Over Linezolid Key structural difference may increase the interaction of tedizolid with the peptidyl-transferase- center binding site o Increase potency against resistant bacterial strains
Favorable PK profile: o Once daily dosing o Easy IV to oral conversion
Has not shown interactions with serotonergic agents
Duration of therapy: 6 days vs 10 days Kisgen JJ, et al. AJHP. 2014;71(8):621- 33. ESTABLISH-1 Randomized, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
Intent-to-treat analysis of 667 patients who had: o One of the following surrounded by erythema: Cellulitis/erysipelas Major cutaneous abscess Wound infection o Minimum total lesion surface area of 75 cm 2 o 1 local and 1 regional OR 1 systemic signs of infection o Gram-positive pathogen suspected or documented
Oral: Tedizolid 200 mg QD for 6 days or Linezolid 600 mg BID for 10 days Prokocimer P, et al. JAMA. 2013;309(6):559- 569. ESTABLISH-1 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% 48-72 h End of Treatment Post-therapy Evaluation P r o p o r t i o n
Similar criteria to ESTABLISH-1 with some differences: o Enrolled substantially more patients that were European, had cellulitis, were febrile, and had larger lesions o Widened the age group to >12 years old
IV: Tedizolid 200 mg QD for 6 days or Linezolid 600 mg BID for 10 days with optional oral step-down Moran GJ, et al. Lancet. 2014;14:696-705. ESTABLISH-2 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 48-72 h End of Treatment P r o p o r t i o n
o f
i n t e n t i o n - t o - t r e a t
p a t i e n t s
w i t h
c l i n i c a l
r e s p o n s e
( % )
Tedizolid 200 mg once daily (n = 332) Linezolid 600 mg twice daily (n = 334) 83% 87% 88% 85% Moran GJ, et al. Lancet. 2014;14:696-705. 2.6% [95% CI, -3.0% to 8.2%] -1.0% [95% CI, -6.1% to 4.1%] Discussion CW presents to the ED with purulent cellulitis on her left leg. She is febrile, tachycardic, and has a WBC 20.3. Culture results pending.
What empiric therapy would you select for this patient?
Final cultures indicate MRSA, but the patient had a previous treatment failure with vancomycin.
Would you consider Linezolid? Tedizolid?
Limitations Linezolid is not commonly seen at St. Francis for SSSIs
Treatment course of tedizolid is just as expensive o Linezolid cost per treatment course = $214/day x 10 days = $2,140 o Tedizolid cost per treatment course = $235/day x 6 days = $ 1,410
Both studies had relatively healthy, community patients with little to no comorbidities
Would you put tedizolid on formulary?
Pulmonary Disposition For Tedizolid Prospective, open-label, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study
Clinical Research Center and Same Day Surgi- Center at Hartford Hospital
20 healthy adult volunteers
Tedizolid 200 mg PO QD for 3 days to steady state Housman ST, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2627-2634. Pulmonary Disposition For Tedizolid % Penetration AUC 0-24 AUC/MIC Target* Tedizolid 41.2 109.3 20 Linezolid 5.2 960 57.2 % Penetration AUC 0-24 AUC/MIC Target* Tedizolid 20.0 52.95 20 Linezolid 0.2 40.8 57.2 *Target PK using serum AUC (tedizolid) and total drug target adjusted for protein binding (linezolid) Housman ST, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2627-2634. Potential Role in Therapy Monte Carlo simulation for lung penetration o Mean tedizolid concentrations (at 24 hours):
o Given an MIC 90 of 0.5 mg/mL for tedizolid against S. aureus, AUC:MIC ratios of 219 and 106 are achieved in the ELF and AM Exceeds the target mean fAUC:MIC ratio of 20
Possible HABP and VABP indications? Free Plasma Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF) Alveolar Macrophages (AM) 0.043 g/mL 1.33 g/mL 1.04 g/mL Housman ST, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2627-2634. Schaadt R, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3236-3239. Discussion
MH is a 70 YO male who was brought in from a SNF with a productive cough. He also had a temperature of 101.3 and WBC 15,000. Chest X-ray showed bilateral infiltrates. Sputum cultures showed presence of MRSA.
PMH: Asthma, Depression Medications: Proair 2 puffs q4-6h prn Advair 250/50 1 inhalation BID Fluoxetine 40 mg QAM The Future For Tedizolid Benefits over linezolid o Increased potency over bacterial resistant strains o Once daily dosing
Role in ABSSSI would be limited
Benefit may be seen more with pneumonia o Great pulmonary penetration o Also penetrates into macrophages which would be beneficial for intracellular agents
Also, vancomycin and linezolid have been seeing more treatment failures due to MRSA resistance
References 1. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP , Goldstein EJC, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: 2014 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2. Tedizolid [Internet]. Hudson (OH): Lexicomp (US). C1978-2013 [cited 2014 Aug 11]. Available from: http://ezproxy.usj.edu:2063/lco/action/doc/retrieve/docid/patch_f/5231522. 3. Kisgen JJ, Mansour H, Unger NR, Childs LM. Tedizolid: a new oxazolidinone antimicrobial. AJHP. 2014 Apr 15;71(8):621-33. 4. Prokocimer P, De Anda C, Fang E, Mehra P, Das A. Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: The ESTABLISH-1 Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-569. 5. Moran GJ, Fang E, Corey GR, Das AF, De Anda C, Prokocimer P. Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug;14:696-705. 6. Housman ST, Pope JS, Russomanno J, Salerno E, Shore E, Kuti, JL, et al. Pulmonary Disposition of Tedizolid following Administration of Once-Daily Oral 200-Milligram Tedizolid Phosphate in Healthy Adult Volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2627-2634. 7. Schaadt R, Sweeney D, Shinabarger D, Zurenko G. In vitro activity of TR-700, the active ingredient of the antibacterial prodrug TR-701, a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Antimicrob, Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3236-3239.