Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
8
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
U
S
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
www.expertconsult.com
Infectious disease emergencies are conditions that have potential for
signicant harm to the patient if not recognized and treated promptly,
and for which timely and appropriate intervention may signicantly
improve outcomes. The following is a discussion of important infec-
tious disease emergencies.
ACUTE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS
Denition, Etiology, and Incidence
Bacterial meningitis is an inammation of the meninges caused by
bacteria. Acute meningitis is characterized by the development of
meningeal signs over the course of a few hours to a few days. The
important causes of bacterial meningitis are outlined in Box 1.
A passive survey conducted in the United States between 1978 and
1981 revealed an annual incidence rate for bacterial meningitis of 3.0
cases per 100,000 population.
1
During this period, bacterial menin-
gitis was predominantly a disease of children, the most common
offending pathogen being Haemophilus inuenzae. The introduction
of routine immunization of children against H. inuenzae type B in
the late 1980s dramatically reduced the incidence of infection with
this microorganism. A consequence was a decrease in the overall
incidence of bacterial meningitis and particularly in meningitis
caused by H. inuenzae, so that bacterial meningitis is now a disease
predominantly of adults.
2
Pathophysiology
The initial event is usually nasopharyngeal colonization with a
pathogenic microorganism.
3
This is followed by mucosal invasion,
bacteremia, and meningeal invasion.
4
A marked inammatory
response occurs in the subarachnoid space, but this response is inad-
equate to control the infection. This inammatory response results
in increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier. This is respon-
sible for the increased cerebrospinal uid (CSF) protein content seen
in patients with meningitis. Progression of meningitis leads to the
development of cerebral edema, resulting in increased CSF pressure.
Inammation of blood vessels traversing the subarachnoid space may
lead to their thrombosis. This can result in ischemia and infarction
of the underlying brain.
Clinical Presentation
Patients with acute bacterial meningitis usually present with head-
ache, neck stiffness, fever, projectile vomiting, and photophobia. In
more advanced disease, there is progressive clouding of conscious-
ness. On examination, neck rigidity may be seen and Kernigs and
Brudzinskis signs may be elicited. Cranial nerve palsies or focal neu-
rologic signs may be seen in a minority of patients. The presence of
petechial skin lesions should raise suspicion for meningococcemia.
Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes viral and tuberculous meningitis,
viral meningoencephalitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and primary
amebic meningoencephalitis. Differentiation from viral meningitis
on clinical grounds is usually difcult, and requires laboratory
testing. Where tuberculosis is prevalent, it must be recognized that
tuberculous meningitis can sometimes manifest acutely and could be
mistaken for bacterial meningitis. Viral meningoencephalitis may
manifest somewhat similarly with headache and fever, but patients
would usually have more profound alteration in the sensorium early
in the illness and neck stiffness may not be prominent. The most
prominent symptom of subarachnoid hemorrhage is a severe head-
ache with a rapid onset. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis is a
rare condition with a presentation similar to that of acute bacterial
meningitis, but cultures are negative and amebae can be detected in
the CSF by careful microscopic examination. There is usually a recent
history of swimming in a warm freshwater lake or pond.
The most important diagnostic test is a lumbar puncture, which
should always be performed in all patients with suspected acute
meningitis. Imaging tests do not help in making the diagnosis or
identifying the cause of bacterial meningitis. It is not necessary to
obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan before performing a
lumbar puncture unless there are focal neurologic decits.
5
The CSF
should be sent for cell count, protein and glucose levels, and Gram
staining and culture. Typical CSF ndings in acute bacterial menin-
gitis are an elevated opening pressure, increased CSF white blood cell
(WBC) count (100-10,000 cells/L), usually with a predominance of
neutrophils, increased CSF protein level (>50 mg/dL) and decreased
CSF glucose level (<40% of simultaneously measured serum glucose
level).
6
Gram staining may reveal the presence of microorganisms
and, if so detected, would be helpful for guiding therapy. In viral
meningitis, the CSF WBC count is elevated, but the cells are usually
predominantly lymphocytes, and the CSF glucose level may be
normal or marginally decreased. The best way to conrm a diagnosis
of viral meningitis is by specic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
testing, if available.
Treatment
The management of bacterial meningitis includes appropriate anti-
biotic therapy and adjunctive corticosteroids.
7,8
Ideally, the lumbar
puncture should be done before the administration of antibiotics.
However, if there is a delay in performing the lumbar puncture for
any reason, antibiotic administration should not be delayed. A
lumbar puncture should be performed as soon as possible, even if
antibiotics have already been administered; the possibility of being
able to make a denite causative diagnosis, and its value in guiding
subsequent therapy and managing possible complications, are fully
worth the effort. Empirical antibiotics should be selected based on
the expected pathogens. The patients age, presence or absence of risk
factors such as middle ear or sinus disease, or recent neurosurgery
provide clues about the cause and pathogenesis.
It is recommended that patients be started on adjunctive dexa-
methasone 10 mg IV every 6 hours for 4 days with the rst dose of
antibiotics, because this has been shown to improve outcomes in
bacterial meningitis.
7
Antibiotic selection and dosing should also take
into consideration the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and
achieve an effective concentration in the CSF. In adults, initial empir-
ical treatment should provide adequate therapy for Streptococcus
pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis. Increasing resistance of S.
pneumoniae to beta-lactam antibiotics (including ceftriaxone) has
prompted recommendations to initiate empirical antibiotic therapy
with a regimen consisting of vancomycin and ceftriaxone.
6
If Listeria
monocytogenes is a possibility (e.g., in older adults, pregnant women,
705
Infectious Disease
Emergencies
Nabin K. Shrestha
E
706 Infectious Disease Emergencies
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
8
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
U
S
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
www.expertconsult.com
Deciencies of the late components of the complement pathway
place individuals at markedly increased risk of developing meningo-
coccal infections.
12
These patients have recurrent episodes of menin-
gococcal infection. Genetic variants of mannose-binding lectin
(MBL), a plasma opsonin that initiates the MBL pathway of comple-
ment activation, may also predispose to increased susceptibility to
meningococcal infections.
13
Clinical Presentation
Meningococcal infection may manifest in different forms: bacteremia
without sepsis, meningitis (with or without meningococcemia),
acute meningococcemia (with or without meningitis), a meningoen-
cephalitic picture, or chronic meningococcemia. The most fulminant
form is acute meningococcemia, in which death may ensue within
hours of the onset of symptoms.
The most common manifestation of acute meningococcemia is
fever with rash. The rash usually begins as a petechial rash, initially
with a few discrete lesions 1 to 2 mm in diameter, which often prog-
ress and coalesce to form larger ecchymotic lesions (Fig. 1). If there
is associated meningitis, meningeal signs and symptoms may also be
present.
The shock state is a dominant feature in patients with acute
meningococcemia, and is often accompanied by disseminated intra-
vascular coagulation (DIC). Meningococcemia can lead to complica-
tions such as massive adrenal hemorrhage, DIC, arthritis, heart
problems such as pericarditis and myocarditis, neurologic problems
such as deafness and peripheral neuropathy, and peripheral gan-
grene.
14
In epidemic settings in third-world countries, case-fatality
rates as high as 70% have been recorded. In endemic settings in
industrialized countries, the mortality rate is approximately 8%, but
could be as high as 19%.
Meningococcemia does not always manifest in a fulminant
manner. An unusual manifestation of meningococcal infection is
chronic meningococcemia, which manifests with low-grade fever,
rash, and arthritis. This manifestation is identical to that of chronic
gonococcemia.
Diagnosis
When patients present with an acute febrile illness with the charac-
teristic ecchymotic rash, the diagnosis is not difcult to make. Early
infection could be missed if a careful physical examination is not
carried out in a patient with an acute febrile illness. Denitive diag-
nosis requires isolation of the microorganism from a normally sterile
site. Samples for blood cultures should always be obtained before the
administration of antibiotics, if possible. Antibiotic therapy rapidly
and those with cellular immune decits), ampicillin should be added.
If Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a possibility, as after neurosurgical
procedures, ceftazidime should be used instead of ceftriaxone. Anti-
biotic therapy should be adjusted once the causative microorganism
has been identied. Duration of therapy for bacterial meningitis has
not been adequately dened. For meningococcal meningitis, 7 days
of therapy is considered adequate. S. pneumoniae should be treated
for 10 to 14 days. L. monocytogenes should be treated for at least 21
days.
9
Figure 1 Classic rash of patient with meningococcemia.
*Mycobacterium tuberculosis is also a bacterium and can cause meningitis, but it
is usually discussed separately as tuberculous meningitis.
In Adults
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Neisseria meningitidis
Listeria monocytogenes
In Children
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Neisseria meningitidis
Haemophilus inuenzae
Streptococcus agalactiae (in neonates)
Escherichia coli (in neonates)
After Neurosurgery
Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Enteric gram-negative bacteria
Box 1 Important Causes of Bacterial Meningitis*
l The differential diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis
includes viral meningitis and meningoencephalitis,
tuberculous meningitis, primary amebic
meningoencephalitis, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.
l Lumbar puncture should be performed as soon as possible.
l Dexamethasone plus empirical antibiotics should be
started without delay.
l Antibiotics should be adjusted subsequently, based on
culture and susceptibility data.
Summary
ACUTE MENINGOCOCCEMIA
Denition, Etiology, and Incidence
Acute meningococcemia is a disseminated infection caused by Neis-
seria meningitidis, with high mortality rates in those with fulminant
disease. Meningococcal infection occurs in an endemic pattern, with
periodic epidemics. There are substantial cyclic variations in disease
incidence. In the United States, epidemics account for less than 5%
of the reported cases. The incidence of meningococcal disease in the
United States peaked at 1.7 cases per 100,000 population in 1997.
10
Pathophysiology
The pathogenesis of meningococcal infection begins with nasopha-
ryngeal colonization. About 10% of the population has asymptom-
atic nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis during nonepidemic
periods. A small proportion of carriers go on to develop invasive
meningococcal disease. People who develop invasive disease generally
do so soon after acquisition of carriage.
11
Factors that facilitate inva-
sive disease include agent factors such as virulence and transmissibil-
ity and host factors.
E
Infectious Disease Emergencies 707
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
8
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
U
S
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
www.expertconsult.com
Pathophysiology
Cranial subdural empyema is usually a complication of infection
of the paranasal sinuses.
23
Less commonly, it results from spread
from the middle ear.
25
It may also occur as a complication of trauma
or neurosurgery. Infection spreads intracranially through the
emissary veins that communicate between the veins draining the
facial structures and intracranial venous channels. In a small pro-
portion of cases, subdural empyema may occur by metastatic
spread, usually from a pulmonary infection, for an unexplained
reason.
Clinical Presentation
Patients with this condition usually present acutely, with headache
and vomiting. Most patients have an altered mental status at presen-
tation and the level of consciousness deteriorates rapidly. Patients
may have neurologic decits and complications such as local cereb-
ritis, cerebral abscesses, and septic dural venous thromboses may
occur.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis should be considered in any patient who presents with
features suggestive of meningitis and a focal neurologic decit or
rapid deterioration in the level of consciousness. If recognized,
lumbar puncture should not be performed because of the risk of
cerebral herniation.
23
CSF ndings would be nonspecic, with an
elevated opening pressure, neutrophilic pleocytosis, and elevated
protein level. Gram staining and culture of CSF are usually negative.
The diagnostic procedure of choice is magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI). If not available, CT scanning with contrast should be done.
CT is inferior to MRI in detecting empyemas at the base of the brain
and in the posterior fossa.
Treatment
Effective treatment for cranial subdural empyema requires a com-
bined surgical and medical approach. Empirical antibiotic therapy
should be broad spectrum and include coverage for gram-positive
pyogenic bacteria and anaerobes. Vancomycin is a reasonable choice
for empirical antibiotic therapy. Cultures obtained at the time of
surgery will help tailor antibiotic therapy. The goal of surgery is
complete evacuation of the purulent collection, which may be
accomplished by craniotomy or through burr holes, depending on
the circumstances of the case. It is important to evacuate the collec-
tion completely, and a craniotomy or multiple surgical procedures
may be necessary to accomplish this. Up to 50% of patients who are
treated with burr hole drainage require reoperation, compared with
20% of those treated with craniotomy.
26
The duration of antibiotic
therapy is usually 3 to 4 weeks after adequate drainage. If there is
associated osteomyelitis of the skull, treatment should be extended
to approximately 6 weeks.
sterilizes the blood and CSF in patients with meningococcal infec-
tion.
15,16
CSF cultures are often positive for microorganisms, even
in patients who do not have clinical evidence of meningitis,
17
and
should always be examined when meningococcemia is suspected.
Microorganisms may also be identied in the biopsy of petechial skin
lesions.
Treatment
The treatment of acute meningococcemia involves appropriate anti-
biotic therapy, along with supportive therapy for shock, heart failure,
DIC, and other complications. Early antibiotic therapy has been
conclusively shown to improve outcomes in patients with meningo-
coccal disease.
18
The recommended treatment for severe meningo-
coccal infection is a third-generation cephalosporin with good CSF
penetration. Ceftriaxone, 1 g every 12 hours, is the most commonly
used treatment.
19
Cefotaxime and ceftazidime should be equally ef-
cacious alternatives. Patients allergic to cephalosporins may be
treated with chloramphenicol, 100 mg/kg, in four divided doses, up
to a total dosage of 4 g/day.
20
High doses of penicillin G should also
usually be adequate; however, small numbers of resistant N. menin-
gitidis have been reported, and penicillin G should therefore not
ordinarily be the rst choice of antibiotic in the absence of suscepti-
bility data. The shock state is a dominant part of the clinical picture
of meningococcemia and supportive management is important. The
use of steroids for meningococcemia is controversial, and a recom-
mendation for its routine use for treatment of this condition cannot
be made.
Prophylaxis
Household contacts are at signicantly higher risk of infection.
21
Chemoprophylaxis is recommended for household contacts, daycare
center staff and clients, and anyone exposed to the patients oral
secretions. For health care workers, this would include persons who
intubated the patient and who provided suction to clear secretions.
Effective prophylactic treatments include a single 1-g dose of ceftri-
axone intravenously or intramuscularly, a single 500-mg dose of
ciprooxacin, a single 500-mg dose of azithromycin, and 600 mg of
rifampin every 12 hours for 2 days.
18
l The classic presentation of meningococcemia is fever and
rash.
l Prompt antibiotic therapy can be lifesaving.
l Shock is a dominant clinical nding and supportive
management is important.
l Close contacts should receive chemoprophylaxis.
Summary
CRANIAL SUBDURAL EMPYEMA
Denition, Etiology, and Incidence
Subdural empyema is a condition in which there is collection of pus
in the region between the dura and the arachnoid. The most common
causes of subdural empyema are aerobic and anaerobic streptococci
(especially the S. milleri group), Staphylococcus aureus and, to a lesser
extent, aerobic gram-negative bacilli.
22,23
Studies have found anaero-
bic infections in varying proportions of infections, with high propor-
tion of patients having anaerobic microorganisms recovered in some
studies with careful culturing.
24
This raises the possibility that these
infections are usually polymicrobial, with anaerobic microorganisms
usually present. Subdural empyemas account for 15% to 20% of all
localized intracranial infections.
23
l MRI or CT scanning should be performed promptly when
cranial subdural empyema is suspected.
l Treatment requires a combined medical and surgical
approach.
l Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy should be
started promptly.
l Cultures obtained at the time of surgery will help tailor
antibiotic therapy.
l Multiple operations may be necessary.
Summary
E
708 Infectious Disease Emergencies
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
8
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
U
S
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
www.expertconsult.com
than cellulitis. Pain out of proportion to the skin changes also may
be an indicator of a more serious infection. On palpation, the affected
area has a woody hard feel. Increasing tissue edema may lead to the
development of compartment syndrome.
Necrotizing myositis or myonecrosis may occur without overt
ndings on the skin surface. The predominant symptom is intense
muscle pain, usually accompanied by fever. Patients usually appear
more ill than would be expected from the physical ndings. Gas
gangrene and other syndromes of necrotizing myositis caused by
anaerobic microorganisms will also have crepitations because of the
presence of subcutaneous gas.
At initial presentation, it may not be possible to make a clinical
distinction between necrotizing fasciitis and necrotizing myositis.
Indeed, both processes may occur simultaneously, especially with
streptococcal infection. Lack of involvement of the overlying skin
does not exclude the presence of an underlying necrotizing process.
Streptococcal necrotizing soft tissue infections are usually associ-
ated with the toxic shock syndrome. This is discussed separately (see
later). Acute vascular compromise from trauma or embolic occlusion
leads to tissue infarction and may progress to infected vascular gan-
grene if the appropriate microorganisms gain access to the devital-
ized tissues.
Diagnosis
Clinical suspicion is important if an early diagnosis of a necrotizing
soft tissue infection is to be made. A clue to the presence of a deep
necrotizing process is the presence of tenderness clearly beyond the
areas of apparent involvement in the skin. Leukocytosis is common.
The creatine kinase (CK) level is usually elevated, but may be normal
in cases of necrotizing fasciitis with minimal muscle involvement.
Ultrasonography, CT scanning, or MRI will usually reveal muscle
swelling and uid in muscle compartments, but may not be apparent
early in necrotizing fasciitis. Histopathologic examination will reveal
the presence of sheets of neutrophils in fascial planes. Gram staining
of tissue exudates will reveal the presence of microorganisms.
Treatment
It is not always obvious whether a skin or soft tissue infection is a
necrotizing infection. When considered a possibility, aggressive man-
agement is important. It is not always possible to predict the causative
microorganism from the clinical features accurately. A prudent
approach would be to treat with antibiotics that are effective against
group A streptococci, S. aureus, enteric gram-negative bacteria, and
anaerobic microorganisms. The antibiotics of choice for initial
empirical therapy are clindamycin plus ampicillin-sulbactam plus
ciprooxacin.
29
If there is reason to suspect MRSA infection, vanco-
mycin may be added. Antibiotic therapy should be modied when
culture and susceptibility data become available. A lack of response
to a reasonable trial of antibiotics should prompt emergent surgical
intervention. Prompt and aggressive fasciotomy and dbridement of
devitalized tissue are necessary to gain control of the infection. Early
surgical intervention reduces mortality.
28
If infection is advanced,
amputation may be necessary, and lifesaving.
NECROTIZING SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS
Denition, Etiology, and Incidence
This term encompasses several specic clinical entities characterized by
disease processes that produce necrosis of subcutaneous tissue, muscle,
or both that progress rapidly and require a combined emergent surgical
and medical approach for optimum outcomes. These entities include
necrotizing fasciitis, streptococcal necrotizing myositis, clostridial myo-
necrosis (gas gangrene), and nonclostridial crepitant myositis.
Type I necrotizing fasciitis is a mixed infection caused by an
anaerobic bacterium (usually Bacteroides or Propionibacterium) in
association with a facultative anaerobic microorganism, such as a
streptococcus or a member of the Enterobacteriaceae. Type II necro-
tizing fasciitis, hemolytic streptococcal gangrene, is caused by group
A streptococci. Other microorganisms may be present in the mix.
Community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA)
has recently been described as a cause of necrotizing fasciitis.
27
Clostridial myonecrosis, also commonly known as gas gangrene,
and streptococcal necrotizing myositis, as their names imply, are
caused by Clostridium spp. and by group A streptococci, respectively.
The latter can rarely be caused by groups B, C, or G streptococci.
Nonclostridial crepitant myositis encompasses several clinical
entities that may result from mixed infection caused by anaerobic
streptococci, along with the following: group A streptococci or S.
aureus (anaerobic streptococcal myonecrosis); a mixture of anaerobic
and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms (synergistic nonclos-
tridial anaerobic myonecrosis, or Meleneys bacterial synergistic gan-
grene); Proteus spp., Bacteroides spp., and anaerobic streptococci in
devitalized limbs (infected vascular gangrene); Vibrio vulnicus; and
Aeromonas hydrophila.
As a group, these illnesses are uncommon but not rare, and
prompt recognition and appropriate management will signicantly
affect outcomes.
Pathophysiology
Necrotizing fasciitis usually begins with the introduction of the
offending microorganism to the subcutaneous structures, usually as
a result of minor trauma. Gas gangrene occurs in situations in which
muscle injury is compounded by wound contamination with soil or
other foreign material harboring spores of a tissue-invasive Clos-
tridium, such as C. perfringens, C. novyi, and C. septicum. Such injuries
include war injuries, compound fractures, and septic abortion. Most
cases of streptococcal myositis appear to begin spontaneously. The
different forms of nonclostridial myonecrosis usually begin with the
introduction of the offending microorganisms at the time of usually
minor trauma. Aeromonas hydrophila myonecrosis occurs as a result
of inoculation of the microorganism at the time of penetrating injury
in a freshwater setting or in association with sh or other aquatic
animals. In all these conditions, there is rapid progression of disease,
often with gas formation in the muscles and subcutaneous tissues,
and in many cases associated with the development of gangrene.
Diabetes mellitus is the most important risk factor for the devel-
opment of necrotizing soft tissue infections.
28
Other risk factors
include alcoholism, corticosteroid use, and parenteral drug use.
Clinical Presentation
Necrotizing fasciitis is usually an acute process, with severe infection
of the supercial and deep fascia. It most commonly occurs in the
extremities. The affected area becomes erythematous, swollen, warm,
and painful. It typically progresses rapidly, with the skin becoming
darker, and over a few days bullae and skin breakdown develop. In
the polymicrobial form, crepitations may be felt subcutaneously,
indicating the presence of gas. Development of anesthesia over an
erythematous area may precede development of skin breakdown and
may serve as a warning sign that the disease process is more serious
l A high index of suspicion will facilitate the early diagnosis
of necrotizing soft tissue infections.
l Skin surface ndings may be minimal.
l Prompt and aggressive surgical dbridement is the most
important aspect of treatment.
l Empirical antibiotic therapy should consist of clindamycin
plus ampicillin-sulbactam plus ciprooxacin.
l Antibiotical therapy should be modied once culture data
become available.
Summary
E
Infectious Disease Emergencies 709
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
8
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
U
S
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
www.expertconsult.com
Diagnosis
The diagnostic criteria for TSS are outlined in Boxes 2 and 3.
34,35
In
streptococcal TSS, streptococci can usually be detected in culture at
the affected site or in blood culture. In staphylococcal TSS, it is rare
to detect staphylococci, except if vaginal cultures are obtained from
patients with menstruation-associated TSS. Prompt diagnosis
requires recognition of the constellation of symptoms and signs, with
conrmation by additional laboratory testing to look for abnor-
malities that indicate damage to the organ systems expected to be
involved by the process. CT or MRI helps in dening the presence of
deep soft tissue infection in patients with streptococcal TSS. Gas is
not produced, but the diagnosis should not be excluded if imaging
ndings do not appear impressive when clinical features are sugges-
tive of the disease.
TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME
Denition, Etiology, and Incidence
Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a severe toxin-mediated bacterial
disease characterized by shock resulting from an excess of inamma-
tory cytokines. Two important syndromes, staphylococcal TSS and
streptococcal TSS, are recognized, caused by S. aureus and Streptococ-
cus pyogenes, respectively. Both are uncommon diseases. The inci-
dence of streptococcal TSS in the United States is 3.5 per 100,000
population per year. Staphylococcal TSS has an overall incidence of
about 1 per 100,000, with menstrual TSS about twice as common as
nonmenstrual TSS.
30
At the peak of the epidemic of menstrual TSS,
before the recognition of the association between the use of certain
tampons and TSS, the incidence of menstrual TSS was as high as 10
per 100,000 population per year, and accounted for over 90% of all
cases of staphylococcal TSS.
Pathophysiology
Toxic shock syndrome is a toxin-mediated disease.
31
Several exotox-
ins of S. aureus and S. pyogenes are capable of stimulating excessive
T cell responses, and are thus known as superantigens. These toxins
include toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) and staphylococcal
exotoxins A, B, and C (SEA, SEB, SEC) of S. aureus, and strepto coccal
pyrogenic exotoxins A, B, and C (SPEA, SPEB, SPEC) of S. pyogenes.
These toxins are capable of binding both major histocompatibiliy
complex (MHC) class II molecules of antigen-presenting cells and
the V