Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fall 2005
Office: JO 4.118
Phone: 972-883-2018
Email: slb026000@utdallas.edu
The overall structure of this section of Rhetoric 1302 will involve arguments between
proponents of nature and nurture in order to explore the intricacies of human
behavior. This course focuses on critical thinking by using an integrated approach to
writing that teaches various rhetorical strategies for reading and constructing
arguments, both written and visual. You will learn to read texts critically according
to key components in argumentative discourse (i.e., claims, grounds, explicit and
implicit assumptions, fallacies, etc.) and to recognize the different purposes of
argument. You will write and revise three to four papers based on issues and
controversies raised in the various texts read during the semester. The assignments
will give you extensive practice in reading critically and writing according to the
rhetorical conventions of an argumentative essay.
Student work will be collected in an electronic portfolio called the “Learning Record
Online” (LRO) throughout the semester. Use of online technology will enhance the
level of feedback you receive, as well as give you experience in the kinds of
collaborative work that many organizations use routinely. Online interaction and
argumentative writing will comprise a large part of the evaluation in the course.
Other assignments will include interviews, observations, and notes, all of which will
be entered into your LRO. The LRO portfolio is your most important argument in the
course as it shows the sum evidence of your learning, including your own
observations and analysis of your learning. You will belong to a “work group” for
various collaborative activities (i.e., discussion of readings, peer critiques), and you
will participate in mid-term and semester-end moderation readings of your LRO
portfolio for feedback from your peers. Because learning to read critically and write
responsively entails mastery of a process, your work will undergo extensive revisions
in response to peer readings and collaboration as well as conferencing with your
instructor.
Also bring a floppy disk (PC-formatted if you use a PC, Mac-formatted if you use a
Mac) or CD/RW. The Rhetoric classroom uses Macintosh computers that can read
either format. Most documents will be produced in Microsoft Word. Whether you use
MS Word outside of the classroom or not, it is best to save your files as rich text
format (RTF) to insure compatibility between the word processing program you use
and the one in your classroom.
Attendance Policy
Office Hours
Please note my regular office hours above. You also can arrange to see me at other
times that are mutually convenient. Office hours belong to you just as much as our
class time. Don’t hesitate to take advantage of my availability and the help I am
ready to offer. If you need to contact me outside of class time or office hours, it is
best to communicate with me by email rather than the office phone.
Email Policy
Grading Policy
This class offers you an approach to learning that may be different from your past
experiences. Because the course is concerned with your development as a critical
reader and writer, the grading strategy will track and monitor that development.
Your work will be collected in an electronic portfolio called the Learning Record
Online (LRO). Your assignments will not receive individual grades, but will receive
individual attention from your classmates and me. Your mid-term and final grades
will be based on your portfolio of written observations and your work samples,
including collaborative work and your three major essays, as well as completion of
each component of your LRO. In the final step to completing your LRO, you will
argue for your grade by summarizing your learning and estimating the grade that
the evidence of your learning supports. In other words, you will directly apply what
you learn in this course, argumentative writing, by arguing for your own grade.
However, each component of the LRO is vital to a quality body of work: your
attendance, participation, promptness, level of writing. effective arguments,
creativity, collaboration, sound rhetorical skills, competent use of technology—all of
these things and more contribute to an outstanding portfolio.
The following grade criteria describe very general indicators that both you and
your instructor may take into consideration when assessing your work and
progress in the course. Your estimation of your mid-term and final grades should
be more detailed and specific and may include a ‘+’ or ‘–‘ if your work tilts above
or below the central grade for which you argue. But the final interpretation and
assessment of your grade remains the responsibility of your teacher.
Plagiarism Policy
Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s work as your own, whether you
mean to or not. For example, copying or paraphrasing passages from another
writer’s work without acknowledging that you’ve done so is plagiarism. Allowing
another writer to write any part of your essay is plagiarism. Copying or purchasing a
paper from any source is plagiarism.
Plagiarism is a serious offense. The possible consequences range from failing the
assignment to failing the course, or worse. Each incident of plagiarism at UTD must
be reported to the administration. If you are not sure how to properly cite a quoted
or paraphrased source, or if you need help with the format of a citation, check with
the New Century Handbook and/or with your teacher. Although you can (and, in
fact, should) seek help and advice from friends, classmates, tutors, and others, be
sure that your written work is your own.
http://www.utdallas.edu/student/slife/dishonesty.html.
Major Assignments
Second Essay: An integrated textual and visual essay that examines and analyzes
the argument of a visual image (or images) using the criteria in Chapter 14 of
Everything’s an Argument. This essay may be created and archived in Lingua MOO
or the WWW, or it may be a traditional Word document that simply displays the
image(s) in the body of your essay. Your image may come from the visuals in
Everything’s an Argument, other publications, Internet, or other media.
First draft due: July 6
Final draft due: July 11
Third Essay: An essay that presents a causal or proposal argument using the
principles and criteria in Everything’s an Argument (Chapter 11 or 12).
Remember: all drafts and final drafts must be recorded online in your LRO
and turned in to me in hard copy (using MLA format and citation and
including a Works Cited page) on the dates they are due.
[Assignments are due by the next class period unless noted otherwise].
[Assignments from Everything’s an Argument textbook will be denoted by EA;
assignments from Quick Access Handbook will be denoted by QA].
Thurs 8/18: IN-CLASS: Intro to course, LRO, and Rhetoric Program website.
Lecture on Rhetoric, freestyle debate.
A ssignment: Record an observation in your LRO. Read EA Ch. 1-5 and QA Ch. 1-
3. Find Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” on google.com and
do a Toulmin Analysis. Record the analysis in your Work Samples.
Tues 8/23: IN-CLASS: Lecture on Toulmin Method and Quick Access and its
resources. Group workshop on Toulmin Analysis project.
Assignment: Read Peach’s “Types of Feminism” and Lorber’s “Night to His Day.”
Record an observation in your LRO containing a brief summary of the main
arguments of the articles and your response to them. Read EA Ch. 5-8.
Complete LRO parts A.1 and A.2 by Tues 8/30.
Tues 8/30: IN-CLASS: Due: LRO A.1 and A.2. Mock panel on gender theory.
Assignment: Read bell hook’s “The Oppositional Gaze” and record an observation
in your LRO containing a brief summary of the main arguments of the article and
your response. Write first draft of essay. Read Ch. 15 in EA.
Thurs 9/8: IN-CLASS: Lecture on grammar, format, and mechanics (bring Quick
Access book). First draft of essay #1 due today. Teacher/student conferences,
in-class writing, and peer reviews.
Assignment: Record an observation in the LRO. Finish your MOO characters and
rooms.
Assignment: Record an observation in the LRO. Finish Essay #2, due 10/3.
Tues 10/3: Final draft of Essay #2 due in class and on the MOO. Lecture
on motivational psychology.
Assignment: Research Erik Erikson, Jean Piaget, and John Bowlby’s stage
theories on the Internet. Record an observation in your LRO stating what
questions you think these theorists were attempting to answer and your own
response. Record notes in Work Samples on each theorist for class on Mon
10/11. Finish B1/C1 by Sun 10/9.
Tues 10/11: IN-CLASS: Group work on stage theory.
Assignment: Read Joseph Campbell’s “The Impact of Science on Myth” and “The
Emergence of Mankind.” Record an observation in your LRO containing a brief
summary of the main arguments of the articles and your response.
Assignment: Decide on paper topic for Essay #3; suggestions are located under
Divine Instructions in Carthage on the MOO. Create outline/prospectus for Paper
#3 for class on 11/1.
Tues 11/1: Class presentations of prospectuses for Essay #3. Group work on
comparative religion.
Tues 11/8: First draft of Essay #3 due. Finish screening of The Blue
Lagoon. Teacher/student conferences, in-class writing, and peer reviews.
Assignment: Record an observation in the LRO. Outline the two (or more)
theories you’ll use in your paper and bring to class on Tues 11/10.
Assignment: Record an observation in the LRO. Work on third draft of Essay #3.