Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facts: On 21 October 1993, the Office of the President announced that it had given
the respondent PGMC the go-signal to operate the country's on-line lottery system
and that the corresponding implementing contract would be submitted not later
than 8 November 1993 "for final clearance and approval by the Chief Executive."
The petitioners raise the following points of law to wit:
a) Under Section 1 of the Charter of the PCSO, the PCSO is prohibited from
holding and conducting Lotteries 'in collaboration, association or joint venture with
any person, association, company or entity';
b) Under Act No. 3846 and established jurisprudence, a Congressional
franchise is required before any person may be allowed to establish and operate
said telecommunications system;
c) Under Section 11, Article XII of the Constitution, a less than 60% Filipinoowned and/or controlled corporation, like the PGMC, is disqualified from operating a
public service, like the said telecommunications system; and
d) Respondent PGMC is not authorized by its charter and under the Foreign
Investment Act (R.A. No. 7042) to install, establish and operate the on-line Lotto and
telecommunications systems."
Considering the above citizenship requirement, the PGMC claims that the Berjaya
Group "undertook to reduce its equity stakes in PGMC to 40%," by selling 35% out of
the original 75% foreign stockholdings to local investors.
Issue: In the deliberation on this case on 26 April 1994, the issues are regarding:
(a) the locus standi of the petitioners, and
(b) the legality and validity of the Contract of Lease in the light of Section 1 of
R.A. No. 1169, as amended by B.P. Blg. 42, which prohibits the PCSO from holding
and conducting lotteries "in collaboration, association or joint venture with any
person, association, company or entity, whether domestic or foreign."