Cravatts: Israel: history vs.

ideology
By Richard L. Cravatts/Guest columnist
The MetroWest Daily News
Posted Oct 30, 2011 @ 12:25 AM

The news that a Newton South High School student was alarmed when she received what
appeared to her to be blatant anti-Israel propaganda from her World History teacher brings
to the forefront once again the reality that, even at the pre-college level, the narrative of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict is frequently contorted to reflect ideology rather than history,
scholarship, and fact.
The high school's world history teacher, Jessica Engel, had given a student a section on
Palestinian women from the Arab World Notebook, which described the fact that "Over the
past four decades, women have been active in the Palestinian resistance movement." What
was their treatment at the hands of the brutal Jewish state, for doing nothing more than
"resisting?" "Several hundred have been imprisoned, tortured, and killed by Israeli
occupation forces since the latest uprising, 'Intifada,' in the Israeli occupied territories."
The problem with this type of simplistic analysis as part of a history curriculum, of course, is
that it presents a one-sided, highly-biased view of the facts on the ground in Israel and the
West Bank and Gaza, completing ignoring some critical aspects of the conflict, namely, that
"resistance" is a euphemism for terrorism, and that when Palestinian women are detained
and arrested by Israeli defense forces it is a result of their actions as part of a campaign to
murder Jews and extirpate Israel.
In fact, the Arab World Notebook, the teaching tool used by Ms. Engel for this class, has
already been discredited as a legitimate part of any history curriculum, precisely because it
has it its primary purpose to whitewash the negative aspects of Arab and Muslim history
while simultaneously assigning blame for the region's pathologies on the colonialism,
imperialism, the West, and Israel specifically. A 2005 report on the Arab World Studies
Notebook written by the American Jewish Committee, for example, "Propaganda,
Proselytizing, and Public Education," found that while the purported intent of the publication
was to create "sympathetic views of the Arabs and Muslim religion in the American
classroom," the end product of the guide was to present "historical distortion as well as
uncritical praise, whitewashing, and practically proselytizing." More relevant to the recent
incident in Newton, the skewed view of the history and present-day politics of the Middle East
as outlined in the guide "appears largely designed to advance the anti-Israel and
propagandistic views of the Notebook's sponsors, the Middle East Policy Council ... and Arab
World and Islamic Resources...."
Wile the Notebook pays lip service to presenting "different points of view," the report
concluded, "it provides only an Arab perspective...on Jerusalem, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and
the conflict between Western and traditional Muslim values."

Teaching history with a political or ideological agenda, of course, does not make for true
education, precisely because it does not put issues into context, distorts movements and
ideologies, and uses events and facts selectively to insure that one interpretation of history,
and only one, is taught to impressionable students.
For instance, one of those "women active in the Palestinian resistance movement" that the
Notebook so adoringly refers to, Ahlam Tamimi, is actually about to be released from prison
as part of the grotesque exchange of some 900 terrorists for kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad
Shalit. The Hamas-recruited, unrepentant, psychopathic Tamimi, who was responsible for the
2001 bombing of the Sbarrro pizzeria in Jerusalem in which 15 Israeli men, women, and
children were killed and 107 wounded, recently appeared on TV and was asked whether she
felt regret for having murdered innocent civilians while they ate pizza. "No," she boasted.
"Why should I feel sorry?" Asked in the interview if she would repeat her murderous actions
again she unhesitatingly asserted, "Yes." "I do not regret what I did," Tamimi had also
ghoulishly proclaimed in a 2006 interview.
The AJC report also found that the Notebook "consistently distorts facts, applies the
inappropriate and invidious paradigm of 'colonialism,' and brings emotion-laden poetry and
short stories of victimization as the predominant voice of Palestinian culture. One of the
writers critiqued in the report, for example, is the late Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish,
whose poem, "Identity Card," is included in the Notebook, and ends with the genocidal lines,
"The usurper's flesh will be my food/Beware - beware - of my hunger/and my anger."
Whether Darwish's cannibalistic references to consuming Israeli flesh - that is, murdering
Jews as a necessary and inevitable byproduct of the so-called occupation of Muslim lands - is
appropriate, or even relevant, content for a history class may be debated; but it certainly
suggests how history can be inverted to suit the ambitions of ideologues promoting one point
of view in which Israelis are oppressive, brutal, inhuman, murderous occupiers and thieves,
and Palestinians are guiltless victims who passively 'resist' an unjust occupation by an
insidious Zionist regime eager to spill Arab blood.
North American college campuses are also currently infected with this same radical antiSemitism and anti-Israelism, promulgated by the identical strain of politicized history and
propaganda that animates the Arab Studies Notebook. One would hope that a new generation
of high school and college graduates - who enter the world as journalists, politicians,
diplomats, professors, even parents - would not have been poisoned during their education
with distortions about Israel and its history, that young people do not learn about the Middle
East by seeing only one side of history and leave school despising, distrusting, and vilifying a
nation for no other reason than it happens to be lived in by Jews.
Richard L. Cravatts, PhD, of Framingham, is director of the Communications Management Program
at Simmons College.
Read more: http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinion/x366632504/Cravatts-Israel-history-vs-ideology#ixzz217ewhYvb