Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Pnta 9, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Museum fur Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
Received 21 March 2006; received in revised form 14 June 2006; accepted 21 June 2006
Corresponding editor: M.V. Srensen
Abstract
The epibiont protozoan communities living on the freshwater shrimp Caridina lanceolata Woltereck, 1937a from the
three major lakes (Towuti, Matano and Mahalona) of the Malili lake system (Sulawesi, Indonesia) were studied. The
number of epibionts varied between 2 and 971 per shrimp. Seven protozoan ciliate species were found: Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp., Cothurnia sp., Zoothamnium sp. (in all three lakes), Vorticella sp. (Lake Mahalona and Lake
Matano), Opercularia sp. (Lake Mahalona), Epistylis sp. (Lake Mahalona and Lake Matano), and Podophrya sp.
(Lake Mahalona). Although these ciliates had been found previously on other crustaceans, they have not been
observed as epibionts on Caridina H. Milne Edwards, 1837. The distribution of the different epibiont species on the
anatomical units of the shrimp was analyzed in each lake. There is a statistical signicant difference between the three
lakes in respect to the number of epibionts on each anatomical unit of all analyzed shrimps. The total and mean
densities of each epibiont species on the different analyzed shrimps showed a signicant difference between the three
lakes; i.e., the presence of each epibiont species on the population of C. lanceolata varied from one lake to another. In
Lake Towuti the highest density of epibionts was found on the anterior part of the shrimp body (rostrum, antennae,
antennulae and eyes) (32.41%), while in the other two lakes, the highest colonization corresponded to the maxillipeds
(31.56% Lake Matano, 40.89% Lake Mahalona). In Lake Towuti the rest of epibionts colonized mainly maxillipeds
and pleopods (both 45.76% of epibionts). In Lake Matano, other epibionts were distributed principally on the anterior
part of the body and pleopods (in total 57.18% of epibionts). In Lake Mahalona, other epibionts were divided among
the anterior part of the body, pereiopods and pleopods (in total 57.39% of the epibionts). Uropods and telson were the
units less colonized in Lake Matano (3.64%) and Lake Mahalona (1.72%), while in Lake Towuti, they presented a
moderate density (13.18% of the epibionts). Taking into account the distribution of epibionts along the anteroposterior axis of the shrimp, considering the different anatomical units, there was a signicant correlation between the
three lakes. This fact indicates that, in the three lakes, the colonization on C. lanceolata followed a similar distribution
pattern, independently of the epibiont species present. The comparison between the distributions of the same epibiont
species along the longitudinal axis of the shrimp on the diverse lakes showed that they correlated respect to their
density values on the anatomical units of the shrimp. Diverse aspects of the colonization patterns are discussed.
Corresponding author.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
168
Morphological features, taxonomic identication, and particular distribution of the epibiont species in each lake are
also included.
r 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Protozoan epibionts; Caridina lanceolata; Malili lakes; Sulawesi; Indonesia
1. Introduction
Epibiosis is an association between two organisms:
the epibiont and the basibiont. The term epibiont
includes organisms that, during the sessile phase of their
life cycle, are attached to the surface of a living
substratum, while the basibiont lodges and constitutes
a support for the epibiont (Wahl 1989; Wahl et al. 1997).
A number of protozoan ciliate species has been
described as epibiont on crustaceans. The biology and
ecology of basibiont crustacean species can be explained
from epibiosis (Bottom and Ropes 1988; Abello et al.
1990; Abello and Macpherson 1992). Crustacean groups
such as cladocerans, copepods, cirripeds, isopods,
amphipods and decapods, include species which have
been found as basibionts for protozoan and invertebrate
epibionts (Ross 1983). Protozoan epibionts are represented by members of the groups: apostomatids,
chonotrichids, suctorians, peritrichs and heterotrichs
(Corliss 1979; Lynn and Small 2000).
The ancient Malili lake system in the central highlands of the Indonesian island Sulawesi (Fig. 1)
comprises ve connected lakes that harbor, like many
other ancient lakes, endemic species ocks, among these
the radiation of atyid shrimps (Crustacea, Caridina).
The basibiont Caridina lanceolata, which is widely
distributed in the three major lakes (Zitzler, von
Rintelen and Glaubrecht, unpublished data) of the
system, is part of this shrimp radiation (Brooks 1950;
Woltereck 1937a, b).
The protozoan epibiont communities on C. lanceolata
from the three major lakes of the Malili lake system of
Sulawesi (Indonesia) were analyzed considering the
biological and taxonomical characteristics of the epibionts, and the distribution of the different epibiont
species on the surface of the shrimp, in order to
contribute to the description and explanation of the
relationships and patterns of distribution of the protozoan epibiont communities in the C. lanceolata populations from the three lakes. Detailed data and results of
this study are described below.
3. Results
A total of seven ciliate protozoan genera were found:
Acineta, Cothurnia, Zoothamnium (on the three lakes),
Vorticella (Lake Mahalona and Lake Matano), Opercularia (Lake Mahalona), Epistylis (Lake Mahalona and
Lake Matano), and Podophrya (Lake Mahalona).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
169
Fig. 1. The Malili lake system on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi. Distribution of Caridina lanceolata in the three major lakes:
Lake Towuti, Lake Mahalona and Lake Matano.
3.1.1. Diagnosis
Ciliates triangular in outline or bell-shaped, loricated
and pedunculate. Lorica surrounding completely the
cellular body (21.163.4 mm long, 21.151.8 mm wide).
Lorica with a free anterior part over the body
enveloping the tentacles (12.012.7 mm long). Body
(17.357.6 mm long, 11.546.1 mm wide), with two
anterior lobular actinophores protruding on the corners,
each with 2756 capitate tentacles. Central area in the
apical surface of the body depressed. Macronucleus
rounded in shape, centrally located (7.715.4 mm long,
5.817.3 mm wide). A spherical micronucleus near the
macronucleus. Stalk (3.817.3 mm long, 3.87.7 mm
wide), joined the lorica via a cup-like expansion. Stalk
with 1218 longitudinal striations which spread out in
the base of the stalk. Basal disk of stalk circular and thin
(5.78.9 mm diameter).
3.1.2. Etymology
The name makes reference to the geographical area
where they were collected (Sulawesi, Indonesia).
3.1.3. Type material
All type material was obtained from the freshwater
shrimp C. lanceolata, collected on: (1) 28 September
2003 in Lake Towuti, Position: 2154.130 S, 121123.780 E.
(2) 1 October 2003 in Lake Matano, Position: 2128.50 S,
121115.550 E. (3) 23 September 2003 in Lake Mahalona,
Position: 2134.720 S, 121129.120 E Holotypes: Accession
No. ZMB 34, mounted as permanent slide with silver
carbonate impregnated individuals. Paratypes: Accession Nos. ZMB 3536, mounted as holotypes. All
ARTICLE IN PRESS
170
Fig. 2. (a) Acineta sulawesiensis. (b) Cothurnia sp. (c) Zoothamnium sp. (d) Vorticella sp. (e) Opercularia sp. (f) Epistylis sp. (g)
Podophrya sp. (cv, contractile vacuole; ma, macronucleus; mi, micronucleus; my, myoneme; l, lorica; s, stalk; sa, suprastylar area; t,
tentacles).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
171
Figs. 37. (3) Acineta sulawesiensis n. sp. Two individuals with the tentacles and the extension of the lorica (SEM). (4) Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp. A specimen showing the stalk and the basal disk. (SEM). (5) Acineta sulawesiensis n. sp. Some ciliates with
the extension of the lorica, tentacles and nuclei. (6) Cothurnia sp. Individual with the lorica and the body. (7) Zoothamnium sp. A
colony (SEM).
Table 1.
Body length
Body width
Lorica length
Lorica width
Macronucleus length
Macronucleus width
Number of tentacles per actinophore
Length of the stalk
Width of the stalk
Diameter of the basal disc
Striations of the stalk
Cyst body length
Cyst body width
Cyst lorica length
Cyst lorica width
Cyst macronucleus length
Cyst macronucleus width
Length of free anterior part of lorica
SD, standard deviation (n 80).
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
29.5
29.3
40.3
38.1
9.6
9.3
38.0
9.1
5.6
7.8
14.3
32.6
19.0
32.6
22.5
20.6
6.7
11.7
11.5
8.6
13.8
9.0
1.9
2.6
12.0
3.5
1.5
4.2
3.4
3.1
3.8
10.7
1.8
5.5
1.1
1.4
17.2
11.5
21.1
21.1
7.6
5.7
27.0
3.8
3.8
5.6
12.0
26.8
13.4
23.0
21.1
17.2
5.7
10.0
57.6
46.0
63.3
51.8
15.3
17.2
56.0
17.2
7.6
8.9
18.0
36.4
28.8
48.0
24.9
28.8
7.6
14.0
ARTICLE IN PRESS
172
Table 2. Comparison of biometric features of Acineta sulawesiensis n. sp., A. baikalica and A. brevistyla (measures in mm)
(Swarczewsky, 1928; Curds, 1985)
A. baikalica
A. brevistyla
A. sulawesiensis n. sp.
Body length
Body width
Lorica length
Lorica width
Length of free anterior part of lorica
7597
65
1016
110
4550
1012
1758
1146
2163
2152
1214
Convex
Convex
Concave
Actinophores
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleus length
Macronucleus width
In two depressions
4550
2
20
11
In two depressions
16
35
1316
1316
In two protrusions
417
48
815
617
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
173
Table 3. Biometric features of Cothurnia sp., Zoothamnium sp., Vorticella sp., Opercularia sp., Epistylis sp. and Podophrya sp.
(measures in mm)
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
Cothurnia sp.
Body length
Body width
Lorica length
Lorica width
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleus length
Macronucleus width
Mouth aperture
Lip diameter
38.8
18.1
81.7
21.1
6.7
2.5
16.3
6.2
5.7
11.5
7.4
1.3
12.0
2.5
9.5
2.2
5.0
3.6
0.0
2.7
24.9
15.3
57.6
19.2
0.0
0.0
11.5
3.8
5.7
9.6
49.9
19.2
96.0
24.9
13.4
3.8
23.0
11.5
5.7
13.4
Zoothamnium sp.
Body length
Body width
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleus length
Macronucleus width
Number of individuals per colony
Contractile vacuole diameter
Length of suprastylar area
Width of suprastylar area
30.4
24.2
75.4
9.2
9.6
17.4
5.2
6.7
4.5
17.2
3.3
4.0
40.4
2.0
4.8
5.2
3.9
1.0
0,8
1.1
24.9
15.3
13.4
5.7
5.7
9.6
1.0
5.7
3.8
15.9
38.4
30.7
144.0
13.4
23.0
28.8
15.0
7.6
5.8
19.2
Vorticella sp.
Body length
Body width
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleous length
Macronucleous width
Cilia length
Number of individuals per colony
Number of bends per stalk
28.4
22.7
34.9
5.5
12.3
11.3
6.1
1.0
2.9
9.1
5.4
15.2
1.3
8.4
4.5
4.3
0.0
1.1
13.4
13.4
13.4
3.8
3.8
5.7
1.9
1.0
2.0
46.0
32.6
69.1
7.6
32.6
21.1
13.4
1.0
5.0
Opercularia sp.
Body length
Body width
Lorica length
Lorica width
Stalk width
Length of the peristomial disc
Width of the peristomial disc
Length of the macronucleus
Width of the macronucleus
Number of zooids in a colony
28.1
15.5
34.0
19.8
4.8
3.4
5.1
3.8
7.2
3.2
1.5
2.6
0.9
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.8
1.3
1.4
3.4
26.8
14.8
32.
15.3
3.9
3.0
4.7
3.1
6.8
1.0
30.72c
16.9
37.9
23.0
5.6
4.7
6.8
4.7
8.9
8.0
Epistylis sp.
Body length
Body width
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleus length
Macronucleus width
Contractile vacuole diametre
Cilia length
Number of individuals per colony
29.7
21.9
30.8
6.6
11.1
11.5
5.4
9.3
1.5
5.0
3.4
12.8
2.1
4.9
3.4
1.8
1.6
1.3
17.2
15.3
5.7
3.8
5.7
5.7
3.8
7.6
1.0
36.4
28.8
61.4
11.5
23.0
19.2
9.6
11.5
6.0
ARTICLE IN PRESS
174
Table 3. (continued )
Mean
Podophrya sp.
Body length
Body width
External layer length
External layer width
Stalk length
Stalk width
Macronucleous length
Macronucleous width
Number of bends per stalk
Number of individuals per colony
Number of tentacles
20.3
16.5
26.8
19.2
69.7
5.1
10.5
7.4
4.3
3.0
12.
SD
4.2
4.4
6.6
1.9
6.1
1.1
1.9
1.2
0.5
1.0
1.6
Minimum
15.3
11.5
23.0
17.2
65.2
3.8
7.6
5.7
4.0
2.0
10.0
Maximum
26.8
23.0
34.5
21.1
76.8
5.7
11.5
8.6
5.0
4.0
15.0
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
175
Figs. 812. (8) Zoothamnium sp. A colony showing the broad stalk and the wide suprastylar area. (9) Vorticella sp. (10) Opercularia
sp. Two individuals. (11) Epistylis sp. (12) Podophrya sp.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
176
Table 4. Length and width of the specimens of Caridina lanceolata analysed and density of the epibionts on the crustacean
(Lake Towuti) (n 40)
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
21.26
2.96
250.90
40.75
193.08
16.43
2.97
0.65
205.40
59.71
168.49
15.05
14.00
2.00
27.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
27.00
4.50
971.00
357.00
730.00
59.00
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
Table 5.
177
Distribution of the ciliate protozoans on the different anatomical units of Caridina lanceolata in the three lakes
Anatomical unit
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
Lake Towuti
Rostrum
Left ocular orbit
Right ocular orbit
Left antennule
Right antennule
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
Right rst pereiopod
Left second pereiopod
Right second pereiopod
Left third pereiopod
Right third pereiopod
Left fourth pereiopod
Right fourth pereiopod
Left fth pereiopod
Right fth pereiopod
Left rst pleopod
Right rst pleopod
Left second pleopod
Right second pleopod
Left third pleopod
Right third pleopod
Left fourth pleopod
Right fourth pleopod
Left fth pleopod
Right fth pleopod
Telson
Left uropod
Right uropod
9.90
0.38
1.40
13.63
13.40
25.10
22.25
58.40
6.50
3.43
1.00
1.10
2.65
1.43
2.13
1.08
0.90
1.00
5.00
5.88
6.28
6.33
7.83
7.78
4.58
4.88
2.13
2.50
10.35
11.68
10.08
14.68
1.00
2.85
20.51
17.22
34.87
30.50
54.59
13.60
7.95
2.43
2.15
7.17
2.97
6.50
2.42
1.89
2.47
7.39
7.57
10.11
9.54
11.44
15.87
5.76
7.23
3.74
3.86
19.68
14.99
11.89
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
5
12
87
71
160
121
283
76
41
12
11
42
11
39
12
10
14
31
32
42
52
43
96
20
29
19
17
86
86
52
Lake Matano
Rostrum
Left ocular orbit
Left antennule
Right antennule
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
Right rst pereiopod
Left second pereiopod
Right second pereiopod
Left third pereiopod
Right third pereiopod
Left fourth pereiopod
Right fourth pereiopod
Left fth pereiopod
Right fth pereiopod
Left rst pleopod
Right rst pleopod
Left second pleopod
Right second pleopod
Left third pleopod
Right third pleopod
26.40
0.65
1.90
2.70
2.75
2.60
41.65
1.05
1.95
0.30
0.55
1.15
2.90
0.10
0.05
0.35
0.80
8.30
7.10
3.10
3.40
6.25
4.30
26.84
2.03
2.55
4.21
4.56
4.59
56.41
3.47
4.35
0.66
2.04
3.72
7.35
0.45
0.22
1.57
3.35
12.50
15.59
6.69
6.98
15.49
9.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
93
9
8
13
17
17
189
15
15
2
9
15
30
2
1
7
15
50
70
30
30
60
31
ARTICLE IN PRESS
178
Table 5. (continued )
Anatomical unit
Left fourth pleopod
Right fourth pleopod
Left fth pleopod
Right fth pleopod
Telson
Left uropod
Right uropod
Lake Mahalona
Rostrum
Left ocular orbit
Right ocular orbit
Left antennule
Right antennule
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
Right rst pereiopod
Left second pereiopod
Right second pereiopod
Left third pereiopod
Right third pereiopod
Left fourth pereiopod
Right fourth pereiopod
Left fth pereiopod
Right fth pereiopod
Left rst pleopod
Right rst pleopod
Left second pleopod
Right second pleopod
Left third pleopod
Right third pleopod
Left fourth pleopod
Right fourth pleopod
Left fth pleopod
Right fth pleopod
Telson
Left uropod
Right uropod
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
2.00
1.90
1.55
0.65
0.10
2.55
2.20
4.58
5.82
5.61
1.57
0.31
3.14
2.98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
26
25
5
1
13
11
5.50
0.90
0.95
7.95
8.30
10.15
7.10
52.75
4.15
0.70
2.00
1.45
2.90
2.45
2.30
1.05
2.60
0.95
3.95
1.90
1.95
1.80
1.70
2.25
0.95
2.85
1.45
0.55
0.30
1.40
0.55
13.45
2.79
2.16
10.30
10.55
21.70
12.22
60.13
10.24
2.25
6.68
4.65
6.12
8.03
7.03
4.70
9.54
4.25
5.05
3.48
3.87
3.07
5.56
6.64
1.39
5.98
3.68
1.43
0.66
2.82
1.47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
12
8
35
42
92
35
226
40
10
30
20
26
33
28
21
42
19
18
12
16
11
25
30
4
22
16
6
2
9
6
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
179
Table 6. Number of each epibiont species on the different anatomical units of Caridina lanceolata (mean7standard deviation;
minimummaximum) in the three lakes
Anatomical unit
Lake Towuti
Rostrum
Left ocular orbit
Right ocular orbit
Left antennule
Right antennule
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
Right rst pereiopod
Left second pereiopod
Right second pereiopod
Left third pereiopod
Right third pereiopod
Left fourth pereiopod
Right fourth pereiopod
Left fth pereiopod
Right fth pereiopod
Left rst pleopod
Right rst pleopod
Left second pleopod
Right second pleopod
Left third pleopod
Right third pleopod
Left fourth pleopod
Right fourth pleopod
Left fth pleopod
Right fth pleopod
Zoothamnium sp.
Cothurnia sp.
8.05714.13
(0.0071.00)
0.0870.35
(0.002.00)
0.1070.44
(0.002.00)
0.6572.21
(0.0013.00)
0.9072.56
(0.0015.00)
0.3070.85
(0.004.00)
0.4370.90
(0.004.00)
3.3578.26
(0.0043.00)
1.0374.01
(0.0025.00)
0.2070.56
(0.002.00)
0.0570.32
(0.002.00)
0.0870.35
(0.002.00)
0.8573.85
(0.0024.00)
0.5071.84
(0.009.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0870.35
(0.002.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
3.1376.76
(0.0028.00)
2.3075.11
(0.0021.00)
1.9075.89
(0.0034.00)
2.4878.50
(0.0052.00)
5.73711.13
(0.0043.00)
3.53715.21
(0.0096.00)
1.6874.45
(0.0020.00)
2.1076.15
(0.0029.00)
0.4871.62
(0.009.00)
0.4871.40
0.8071.98
(0.009.00)
0.1370.46
(0.002.00)
0.9872.56
(0.0011.00)
12.45719.51
(0.0087.00)
11.90716.29
(0.0069.00)
22.80734.77
(0.00160.00)
19.88729.47
(0.00121.00)
55.13750.69
(0.00239.00)
5.23713.19
(0.0076.00)
3.1877.97
(0.0041.00)
0.9372.28
(0.0012.00)
1.1372.19
(0.0011.00)
1.8374.02
(0.0018.00)
0.8072.10
(0.0010.00)
2.1076.50
(0.0039.00)
1.0372.35
(0.0012.00)
0.7871.89
(0.0010.00)
0.9372.45
(0.0014.00)
1.4572.11
(0.008.00)
3.7377.10
(0.0032.00)
3.4076.62
(0.0038.00)
3.5375.36
(0.0024.00)
2.7874.52
(0.0021.00)
4.2376.95
(0.0029.00)
2.9574.57
(0.0019.00)
2.8375.08
(0.0023.00)
1.6573.55
(0.0019.00)
2.0073.78
1.2372.12
(0.0010.00)
0.1870.68
(0.003.00)
0.3370.80
(0.004.00)
0.6071.28
(0.006.00)
0.6071.34
(0.005.00)
1.9374.05
(0.0023.00)
1.9572.83
(0.0012.00)
0.0570.22
(0.001.00)
0.0570.32
(0.002.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0870.47
(0.003.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0570.32
(0.002.00)
0.0870.47
(0.003.00
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0570.32
(0.002.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
0.0370.16
ARTICLE IN PRESS
180
Table 6. (continued )
Anatomical unit
Telson
Left uropod
Right uropod
Anatomical unit
Lake Matano
Rostrum
Left ocular orbit
Left antennule
Right antennule
Zoothamnium sp.
Cothurnia sp.
(0.008.00)
0.0370.16
(0.001.00)
0.1570.66
(0.003.00)
0.1370.46
(0.002.00)
(0.0017.00)
10.33719.67
(0.0086.00)
7.08714.20
(0.0086.00)
5.2078.91
(0.0050.00)
(0.001.00)
0.0070.00
(0.000.00)
4.3574.71
(0.0019.00)
4.7576.83
(0.0033.00)
Zoothamnium
sp.
Cothurnia s
p.
Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp.
Epistylis
sp.
Vorticella
sp.
21.15727.62
(093)
0.5071.47
(06)
0.6072.04
(09)
0.1570.49
(02)
0.7572.67
(012)
2.5574.55
(017)
2.0073.32
(09)
0.7072.90
(013)
0.0570.22
(01)
1.1071.92
(08)
1.3572.91
(011)
0.1570.49
(02)
0.5572.04
(09)
5.7577.93
(023)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.6571.84
(08)
0.5571.76
(07)
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
Right rst pereiopod
Left second pereiopod
Right second pereiopod
Left third pereiopod
Right third pereiopod
Left fourth pereiopod
Right fourth pereiopod
Left fth pereiopod
Right fth pereiopod
Left rst pleopod
Right rst pleopod
Left second pleopod
Right second pleopod
Left third pleopod
Right third pleopod
13.40728.20
(081)
1.0073.48
(015)
1.2073.82
(015)
0.1570.49
(02)
0.4572.01
(09)
0.4071.79
(08)
0.2571.12
(05)
0.8573.80
(017)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.3071.34
(06)
0.8073.35
(015)
1.6574.31
(017)
0.7072.15
(09)
0.4070.94
(03)
0.4571.23
(05)
0.6572.25
(010)
0.6071.43
0.1070.45
(02)
0.1570.49
(02)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.5072.24
(010)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
22.40756.17
(0186)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.6572.48
(011)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.7073.13
(014)
2.1577.17
(030)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.5072.01
(09)
1.0074.47
(020)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.2571.12
(05)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.2570.79
(03)
0.5572.24
(010)
0.1070.45
6.05711.98
(050)
5.15711.64
(050)
2.4076.68
(030)
1.9076.69
(030)
3.10711.15
(050)
1.6076.69
0.1070.45
(02)
0.3071.34
(06)
0.8072.78
(012)
1.8577.58
(034)
2.0077.12
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
181
Table 6. (continued )
Anatomical unit
Zoothamnium
sp.
Cothurnia s
p.
(05)
0.3070.73
(03)
0.1570.37
(01)
0.8573.80
(017)
0.2070.62
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
(02)
0.2070.52
(02)
0.3571.18
(05)
0.6071.85
(08)
0.3570.93
(03)
0.0570.22
(01)
2.2573.06
(013)
1.8072.88
(010)
0.0570.22
(01)
Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp.
Epistylis
sp.
Vorticella
sp.
(031)
0.3571.35
(06)
0.3071.13
(05)
(030)
1.1074.47
(020)
1.0074.47
(020)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.2070.70
(03)
0.3070.66
(02)
0.1070.31
(01)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.1070.45
(02)
Zoothamnium
sp.
Opercularia
sp.
Podophrya
sp.
Cothurnia
sp.
Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp.
Epistylis
sp.
Vorticella
sp.
0.2070.89
(04)
Left antennule
Right antennule
0.2570.79
(03)
Left antenna
Right antenna
Maxillipeds
Left rst pereiopod
0.1070.45
(02)
0.5071.82
(08)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.8072.78
(012)
0.1570.67
(03)
2.2579.38
(042)
0.6072.68
(012)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.6072.68
(012)
0.5072.24
(010)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.2570.79
(03)
0.9072.79
(012)
0.9572.16
(08)
7.5579.61
(033)
10.00716.33
(072)
9.45720.79
(089)
6.05710.47
(033)
39.80743.92
(0176)
1.8575.30
(023)
0.6572.25
(010)
0.9072.79
(012)
1.1573.42
(014)
2.3576.05
(026)
1.6577.38
(033)
0.8573.57
(016)
0.7573.35
(015)
2.1079.39
(042)
Anatomical unit
Lake Mahalona
Rostrum
0.2070.89
(04)
2.18711.19
(050)
0.7073.13
(014)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.9074.02
(018)
0.3071.34
(06)
0.4071.79
(08)
0.8073.58
(016)
1.4076.26
(028)
0.4572.01
(09)
1.9078.50
(038)
0.9574.25
(019)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
182
Table 6. (continued )
Anatomical unit
Zoothamnium
sp.
Opercularia
sp.
Podophrya
sp.
Cothurnia
sp.
Acineta
sulawesiensis n. sp.
Epistylis
sp.
Vorticella
sp.
0.1070.45
(02)
0.3570.88
(03)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.4071.27
(05)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.2070.89
(04)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.7072.36
(010)
0.2070.89
(04)
0.1570.67
(03)
0.6071.60
(06)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.1070.45
(02)
0.3571.57
(07)
0.0570.22
(01)
1.0572.39
(09)
1.0072.03
(07)
0.2570.72
(03)
0.2070.70
(03)
1.2074.71
(021)
1.5074.67
(021)
0.7571.37
(04)
1.4572.76
(08)
0.9571.79
(06)
0.3570.99
(04)
0.1570.49
(02)
0.8572.06
(07)
0.5571.47
(06)
0.1070.45
(02)
1.2073.71
(015)
0.6072.68
(012)
1.2573.82
(016)
0.1570.67
(03)
0.5572.04
(09)
0.2070.70
(03)
0.3571.57
(07)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.2070.89
(04)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.1570.67
(03)
0.0570.22
(01)
0.1070.45
(02)
Telson
0.7572.31
(08)
0.3071.34
(06)
0.1070.45
(02)
Left uropod
0.0570.22
(01)
Right uropod
0.1070.45
(02)
0.3071.34
(06)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
183
Table 7. Length and width of the specimens of Caridina lanceolata analysed and density of the epibionts on the crustaceans (Lake
Matano) (n 40)
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
16.10
2.65
131.25
3.06
0.61
143.56
11
2
6
21
4
670
51.25
14.55
11.75
48.65
5.80
51.49
23.35
12.04
120.73
21.38
0
0
0
0
0
177
98
31
523
96
ARTICLE IN PRESS
184
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
185
Table 8. Length and width of the specimens of Caridina lanceolata analysed and density of the epibionts on the crustacean (Lake
Mahalona) (n 40)
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum
15.90
3.12
135.75
2.45
4.00
1.30
1.35
94.80
5.90
15.15
2.62
0.81
137.78
9.35
8.09
4.90
5.17
87.94
16.10
37.08
11.00
2.00
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19.70
4.60
523
42
30
22
23
318
68
141
ARTICLE IN PRESS
186
4. Discussion
The correlation between the three lakes in respect to
the distribution of epibionts along the antero-posterior
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
187
Fig. 24. Distribution of the epibionts (total mean densities) along the longitudinal axis of C. lanceolata in the three lakes.
Anatomical units are considered in ve groups.
Fig. 25. Distribution of the epibionts (total mean densities) along the longitudinal axis of C. lanceolata in the three lakes.
Anatomical units are considered individually.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
188
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
189
5. Conclusions
(1) The protozoan ciliate epibionts observed in
C. lanceolata from three lakes of Sulawesi (Indonesia), were found by rst time in this basibiont
species. Morphological and taxonomical aspects of
these ciliates were described.
(2) Among these epibiont species, one was described as
a new species called A. sulawesiensis.
(3) Some morphological features of the epibiont species
may represent an adaptation to the epibiotic life,
which have possibly evolved in an independent way
in these particular environments like the lakes of the
Malili system.
(4) The statistical analysis of the distribution of the
ciliate epibionts on the surface of C. lanceolata,
considering the epibiont density in the different
anatomical units of each shrimp examined, showed
that there was a signicant difference between the
three lakes considered.
(5) In Lake Towuti the highest density of epibionts was
present on the anterior part of the shrimp (rostrum,
antennae, antennulae and eyes), followed by the
maxillipeds and pleopods.
(6) In Lake Matano epibionts were located mainly on
the maxillipeds, followed by the anterior part of the
body and pleopods.
(7) In Lake Mahalona epibionts were more abundant
on the maxillipeds, followed by the anterior part of
the body, pereiopods and pleopods.
(8) In each lake there was an epibiont community on
C. lanceolata characterized by the present epibiont
species, their distribution and density on the
anatomical units of the basibiont, and the variation
of the distribution on the different colonized
shrimps.
(9) The colonization on C. lanceolata offered a similar
pattern in the three lakes, with a gradient along the
antero-posterior axis of the basibiont body.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
190
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Daisy Wowor and Ristiyanti
Marwoto (MZB) for their logistic support in Indonesia
and to PT Inco in Soroako. LIPI (Indonesian Institute
of Sciences) provided research permits. We also thank
Matthias Glaubrecht and Thomas von Rintelen for their
support of the Malili lake shrimp project.
References
Abello, P., Macpherson, E., 1992. Epibiosis and rhizocephalan
infestation patterns in relation to the reproductive biology
of Lithodes ferox Filhol, 1885 (Anomura: Lithodidae).
J. Crust. Biol. 12, 561570.
Abello, P., Villanueva, R., Gili, J.M., 1990. Epibiosis in deepsea crab populations as indicator of biological and
behavioural characteristics of the host. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc.
UK 70, 687695.
Arndt, C.E., Fernandez-Leborans, G., Seuthe, L., Berge, J.,
Gulliksen, B., 2005. Ciliated epibionts on the Arctic
sympagic amphipod Gammarus wilkitzkii as indicators for
sympagobenthic coupling. Mar. Biol. 147, 643652.
Beaver, J.R., Crisman, T.L., 1989. The role of ciliated
protozoa in pelagic freshwater ecosystems. Microb. Ecol.
17, 111136.
Bottom, M.L., Ropes, J.W., 1988. An indirect method for
estimating longevity of the horseshoecrab (Limulus polyphemus) based on epifaunal slipper shells (Crepidula
fornicata). J. Shellsh Res. 7, 407412.
Brooks, J.L., 1950. Speciation in ancient lakes. Quart. Rev.
Biol. 25, 131176.
Cairns Jr., J., McCormick, P.V., 1993. Protists as Indicators of
Water Quality in Marine Environments. In: Handbook of
Hazardous Materials. Academic Press, New York, pp.
627638.
Carrick, H.J., Fahnenstiel, G.L., 1992. Growth and production of planktonic protozoa in Lake Michigan. In situ
versus in vitro comparison and importance to food web
dynamics. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37, 12211235.
Corliss, J.O., 1979. The Ciliated Protozoa: Characterization
Classication and Guide to the Literature, second ed.
Pergamon Press, New York.
Curds, C.R., 1985. A revision of the Suctoria (Ciliophora,
Kinetofragminophora) 1 Acineta and its morphological relatives. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. Ser. 48,
75129.
Curds, C.R., 1986. A revision of the Suctoria (Ciliophora,
Kinetofragminophora) 4 Podophrya and its morphological relatives. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. Ser. 50,
5991.
Fenchel, T., 1990. The role of protozoa in nature in
terms of functional properties related to size. Zool. Sci. 7,
5158.
Fernandez-Leborans, G., 2001. A review of the species of
protozoan apibionts on crustaceans III Chonotrich ciliates.
Crustaceana 74, 581607.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Fernandez-Leborans et al. / Zoologischer Anzeiger 245 (2006) 167191
191