Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Three-Dimensional
Effects of Adiustment
and Cementation
on Crown Seating
Reprint requests: Or Shane N. White, Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, use School of Dentistry, 925 West
Thirty-fourth Street #4367, tos Angeles, California 90089-0I41.
Fig 1 Diagram ot cemented crown.
lournal of Prosthodonlics
248
Volume 6,
249
White/KipniE
Den-Mat, Santa Maria, CA); and microfilled bisphenol giycidyl methacrylafe/phosphate ester resin
(GMA/PF) (Panavia Fx, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan),
Thecastingswerelufed to their teeth and placed in
a custom paralleling jig. The samples were supported in a vertically upright position and a flat
plunger applied a vertical force of 49N'^' against the
domed occiusai surfaces,-After 7 minutes fhe specimens were removed from the jig, and the excess
luting agent was removed. The marginal openings
were remeasured after the specimens were stored
at37Cim0O% humidity for 24 hours,
A relative term to describe tilting was defined in
the following way. Each of the four individual measurements on a single specimen were subtracted
from its mean, giving four individual deviations
from the mean. These deviations were squared,
added together, divided by fhe number of degrees
of freedom (3), and the square root derived. This
relative term describes the relationship of the individual measurements to their mean. If there is no
tilting the relative term will be zero, and as tilting
increases the differences between the four individual measurements will increase, as will the relative
term. This procedure is the same as that for determining standard deviation, which is used to measure how much individual terms differ from their
mean.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to evaluate fhe differences in tilting resulting from the
initial fitting, adjusted, and cemented status of the
castings, ANOVA was based on a split-plot factorial
design with individual crowns as blocks because
measurements of tilting in the initial, adjusted, and
cemented conditions were from the same crowns
and the five groups with different cement types
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
ZP
Gl
PC
GMA-I-NPG:
GMA/PE
.994
.998
.997
.984
.983
,997
ID ID ID
ID ID ID
CD CO Ul
Luting agent
Casting status
.989
997
.999
,990
,995
,998
Table 2 The Means, Standard Errors, and Relative Coefficients of Variation (RCV)
of the Relative Tilting Terms of Different Crowns (n - 7)
-uting agent
ZP
Gl
PC
GMAflMPG
GMA/PE
Casting status
Mean
Standard error
RCV %
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
50.40
44.32
57,27
36,43
t9.70
57.54
50,84
4t,84
67,38
50,40
45.S0
160,4t
35.79
21.77
203.21
8,86
8,54
14.60
8.87
6.22
14 41
15.78
12.44
30,50
12,48
9.73
30,06
8.78
5,76
68.07
17.58
19,26
25,49
24.35
31.58
25,04
31,03
29.74
45.27
24.76
21.26
1B,74
24.54
26,47
33.50
250
While/Kipni
Results
Luting agent
Casting status
Interaction between iuting agent
and casting status
P
.0812
< .0001
-0018
Source of variation
ZP
Gl
PC
GMA+NPG
GMA'PE
Casting status'
> .5
.25 < P < ,50
> 5
.0007
< .0001
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
Cement group"
>.5
> .5
< .0001
N = 7.
" N = 35.
2nc
Ptiospbate
Glass
lonomer
. Mumber3,t993
251
GMA/PE
resin
The Tukey's multiple comparisons test for different status of castings (Tabie 5) showed that the
difference between GMA-fNPG and MA/Pli resulted trom the significantly less upright positions
of the castings after cementation, while tilting after
adjustment was not significantly iess than for the
initiai condition. The same test applied lo different
cement groups (Table 6) demonstrated that the
choice of cement influenced the tilting of cemented castings. Tilting was the least for ZP, followed by Gl and PC, although these three groups
were not significantly different from each otber.
The GMA+ NPG and GMA/PE groups tilted crowns
signiticantiy more than ZP, Gl, or PC, but were not
significantly different from each other.
Casting status
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
45.80
50,40
160,41
GMA,'PE
Initial
Adjusted
Cemented
21,77
35.79
203,21
Discussion
Luting agent
The extremely high interoperator reliability coefficients show that interoperator differences, and
hence intraoperator differences, had no effect on
this study. The high interoperator reliability coefficients suggest that the digital travelling micrometer
may be more accurate than its manufacturer states
and that the individual examiners were in good
agreement with one another.
The condition of the casting, ie, initial vs adjusted
vs cemented fit, significantly affected tilting (Tables
4 and 51- The same trends were found in all luting
agents (Table 2, Fig 2), Adjustment using a silicone
disclosing medium significantly decreased overall
tilting and cementation increased overall tilting
(n = 35); however, the sample sizes were too small
to demonstrate statistically significant changes for
all the luting agents separately (n ^ 7) (Table 4|,
Significant changes were demonstrated for the
resin groups GMA-i-NPG and GMA/PE which
caused more tilting of the castings (n = 7) (Table 5).
Retrospective calculations suggested that significant changes might have been demonstrated for
luting agent groups ZP, Gl, and PC if a sample size
of 20 had been used for each.
The value of the relative tilting term of an individual specimen is dependent on the orientation of
the four measurements to the maximum and minimum opening. However, the entire population of
specimens was treated equally and assigned randomly to treatment groups, ANOVA compares Ihe
means of groups, not their individual members, so
differences in orientation are averaged out within
each group and do not affect the analysis. The
absence of bias among groups was confirmed by
simple main effect ANOVA (Table 4], Not only did
the directions o the original tiltings occur at random, but changes in direction resulting from the
Luting agent
GMA-i-NPG
ZP
Gl
PC
GMA-FNPG
GMA,'PE
252
Whit/Kipnis
The initial castings were tilted. This misorientation could be partly accounted for by differences in
marginal configuration of castings caused by laboratory procedure variables. As the castings were
unable to rotate independently of the teeth on
which they were placed, these differences in marginal configuration remained constant throughout
the study and did not affect the "paired" split plot
analysis. The interexaminer variability was so small
as to be insignificant (Table 1).
The exact clinical significance of tilting is not
known. However, it is reasonable to assume that
tilting is undesirable, and that clinicians should
attempt to minimize it through choice ot technique
or luting agent. Greatly tilted cemented castings
will have some margin areas much more open than
others. These widely open areas are more prone to
cement failure and subsequent disease. Internal
thicknesses of cement also vary, exposing some
areas to greater stresses.
The tilting of the castings luted with resin cements was so great that occlusal contacts could be
significantly deranged horizontally. Resin cements
also have greaterfilm thicknesses and much poorer
marginal seating than other cements, causing significant vertical changes.'-'^ Therefore, castings
luted using resin cements will require careful occlusal examination and adjustment following cementation.
Different methods of applying seating force
might produce different amounts of tilting. Most
current knowledge of casting seating and cementation is derived from quasi-static axial loading situations,'" " so the quasi-static axial method was used
in this study. When the simplest situations have
been fully understood more complex variations
should be investigated. The dynamic loading
method might increase seating and decrease
tilting." This method should be further investigated
with reference to tilting and a wide variety of luting
agents.
Siiicone disclosing media improve the marginal
adaptation of castings."" They also have the additional advantage of decreasing the tilt of full coverage castings.
The results of this study are in agreement with
the observations of Lange' and orgensen-, who
noted that cementation with zinc phosphate
caused castings to become tilted, and with those of
White et al", who noted that adjustment using a
siiicone disclosing medium resulted in a partial
uprighting of tilted castings.
Prior studies on film thickness and on marginal
seating showed that resin cements, CMA/PE and
GMA-i-NPC, had significantly greater film thick-
f 6, Number 3,1993
Conclusions
Complete crown restorations were adjusted using a siiicone disclosing material and subsequently
luted to natural teeth using one of five different
luting materials. Within the design of this study and
the limitation of the number of castings evaluated,
the following conclusions may be made:
1. A relative term capable of describing threedimensional tilting of castings was defined.
2. The three-dimensional tilt of a routinely made
crown was affected by its initial fit, internal adjustment, and luting.
3. Adjustment with a siiicone disclosing medium
tended to upright crowns.
4. Luting tended to tilt crowns.
5. Resin cements tilted crowns significantly more
than glass-ionomer, zinc phosphate, or polycarboxylate luting agent5.
References
1. Lange F. Forsog over cementering af finerkroner (Experiments on cementing of crowns). Tandlaegebladet 1955;59:
181-186.
2. lorgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc
phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1960;18:479-490.
3. Fusayama T, Ide K, Hosada H, Relief of resistance of cement
of full cast crowns. | Prosthet Dent 1964; 14:95-105.
4. Iones MD, Dykema RVV, Klein Al. Television micromeasurement ot vents and non vented cast crown margin adaption.
Dent Clin North Am 197l;15:663-678.
5. Beiser UC, Mactntee Ml, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain
fused to metal marginal designs in vivo: A scanning electron
microscope study. | Proslhet Dent 1985; 53:24-29.
S. Cooney |P, Richter WA, MacEntee Ml. Evaluation of ceramic
margins for metal-ceramic restorations. | Prosthet Dent
1985; 54:1-5.
7. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick |D, Chappeli RP. Marginal fit of
poicelain fused to metal and two lypes ol ceramic crown. |
Prosthet Dent 199n;63:26-31.
8. Byrne C. Influence of finish-line form on crown cementation, Intl Prosthodont1992;5.137-144,
9. McLean |W, Von Fraunhofer |A. The estimation of cement
film thickness hy an in vivo technique. Br Dent ] 1971;
131:107-111.
10. Kelly |R, Davis SH, Campbeii SD. Non destructive three
dimensional internal fil mapping of fixed prostheses. | Prosthel Dent 1989;61:368-373,
253
Wliite/Kipris
11. While SN, Sorensen |A, Kang SK. Improved marginal sealing
o cast restorations using a silicone disclosing medium. Int J
Prosthodonl 1991 ;4:333-326.
12. While SN, Yu Z. Fiim Ihiciiness of new adhesive luting
agenls. | Proslhet Deni 1992;67:782-785.
13. While SN.YuZ, KipnisV.Theelfect o adhesive lLlingagenl5
on (he marginal seating ol casi restorations. J Prasthet Deni
1993;69:28-l.
Ulerature Abstracts
254