Tugas MPPI ke 9

Ahmed Ibrahim alrashid yousif

(p050148011)

Discussion :
when we look at the result whose are mentioned on the table
above it is clear that according to the front yields for different
treatment by different fungicide ,but there are many different fungicide
have same influence such as treatment have similar letters , and
according the result of treatment by different fungicide to control for
Colletotrichum spp on chile plants on the field , and the plant whose
were treated by Fungicide A has a high production of fruits
(16.2c)ton/ha , but the plants whose treated by usual Fungicide whose
used to control for colletotrichum spp in chili plants has get a second
percentage of production (15.9c)ton/ha but have a same influence for
colletotrichum spp , while Fungicide C , B and control although have
different influence for fruits production but the statistical result is the
same no different significance , so comparing the result of treatments
with control the Fungicide A and usual fungicide have high influence for
protection the chili plant from colletotrichum spp under the field
conditions .

A
06
05

nofis niaK

04 namanaT
koro-koro
gnugaj namanaT
03
satabmep apnaT

(%) tikaynep isnedesni

02
01
51 01

0
0

B
21
01
8 nofis niaK
koro-koro namanaT
6
gnugaj namanat
4
satabmep
apnat

(%) tikaynep naidajek

2
51 01
manat haletes I ek u ggnem

0
0

Figure 1 The incidence of yellow leaf curl of red chili peppers on a

plantation. (A) with PGPR, (B) without PGPR.
Observations show that the severity of jaundice increased at week 2
until week 12 ,while the plants that has treated with PGPR has resistance to
infection than plants whose are not treated with PGRP , that indicates the
PGRP have ability to increase plant resistance for infection by leaf curl
disease whose transmitted by white fly for plants, from other side the
limiting edge also has shown ability to protection the plant from infection by
insect and when we use corn like limiting edge ( pembatas pinggir ) the
plants of chili has shown a low average of infection comparing with control
and other limiting edge ( pembatas pinggir ) , even the plants are treated
by PGPR without to use limiting edge has resistance to infection more than
plants are not treated by PGPR without limiting edge ( pembatas pinggi ) .

Pimetrozin
Tiametoksam
Diafentiuron
Metidation
kontrol

Jumlah imago B. Tabaci/perangkap

Magelang
Tegal Lembang
13.5
12.3
11.5
15.7
13.5
14.5
17.5
16.5
17
40
22.5
25.5
35.5
24
22.5

Jumlah imago B.tabaci (individu)

45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

pimetrozin
tiametoksam
diafentiuron
metodation
kontrol

Lokasi penelitian
Image 2 Number of imago B.tabaci trapped with various insecticide
treatments in three regions .
according to the table above can observe that Insecticides meditation
is able to catch B.tabaci in trap higher than other insecticides in Magelang
and Lembang. followed by insecticides diafenthiuron, tiametoksam, and

pymetrozine. Therefore, we can observe that the plants on control in tegal

regions has high average to catch that B.tabaci in trap , so we can
conclude that the pesticide meditation has a high ability to catch the
B.tabaci in traps in different three regions ,followed by diafenthiuron ,
tiametoksam and pymetrozine .