Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[T]
MsC, professor of Operative Dentistry Area, Dental School, Pontifcia Universidade Catlica do Paran (PUCPR), Curitiba,
PR - Brasil.
[b]
Assistant professor, Operative Dentistry Area, Dental School, State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG), Ponta Grossa, PR - Brasil.
[c]
DDS, PhD student, Dental Graduate Program (Operative Dentistry Area), Dental School, Pontifcia Universidade Catlica do
Paran (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR - Brasil.
[d]
Assistant professor Operative Dentistry Area, Dental School, Federal University of Paran (UFPR), Curitiba, PR - Brasil.
[e]
PhD, professor of Operative Dentistry Area, Dental School, Pontifcia Universidade Catlica do Paran (PUCPR), Curitiba,
PR - Brasil, e-mail: rui.mazur@pucpr.br
[a]
[R]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the degree of conversion of different shades of
a composite resin activated with two different light sources. Material and method: Composite resin
(Charisma), A2 and SL were photoactivated with a halogen lamp and a LED based system, at three
different light activation times (10, 20 and 40s). The degree of conversion was analyzed by ultraviolet
spectroscopy with variation in wavelength. The data were submitted to ANOVA and the Games Howell
test (5%). Results: The resin composite shade SL presented a higher degree of conversion in depth than
the resin composite shade A2. The three light activation times had no influence on the degree of conversion in the groups of resin composite SL light activated with halogen light and LED. Conclusion: It was
concluded that the resin composite SL presented the highest degree of conversion, irrespective of the
light polymerization time and the light source used.
[P]
Keywords: Degree of conversion. Composite resin. Light polymerization.
224
Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF.
[R]
Resumo
Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o grau de converso de uma resina composta com diferentes cores,
utilizando duas fontes ativadoras. Material e mtodo: Utilizou-se uma resina composta (Charisma) nas cores
A2 e SL, fotoativada com lmpada halgena e com sistema LED, em trs tempos de fotoativao (10, 20 e 40s).
O grau de converso foi analisado por meio da espectrometria ultravioleta, com variao no comprimento de onda.
Os dados obtidos foram submetidos ferramenta ANOVA e ao teste Games Howel (5%). Resultados: A resina
composta cor SL apresentou maior grau de converso que a resina composta cor A2. Os trs tempos de fotoativao
no influenciaram no grau de converso nos grupos de resina composta SL fotoativadas com luz halgena e LED.
Concluso: A resina composta SL apresentou maior grau de converso independente do tempo de fotopolimerizao
e da fonte de luz utilizada.
[K]
Introduction
One of the most critical aspects of a composite resin restoration is the polymerization stage.
Incomplete polymerization may result in a resin
with high porosity, less hardness, low polishing and
high staining capacity and even toxic effects on pulp
caused by the free monomers (1-4).
Adequate light activation transforms the
monomers into a complex polymer structure. Monomer
conversion into polymers does not attain 100%, but
results in monomers that remain unreacted (1). Resin
composites start the polymerization process by absorbing light in a specific range of wavelength around 400
to 500 nm; once activated, react with the reducer agent
(aliphatic amine) to produce free radicals.
The number of double carbon links (C=C)
present in the monomers, which are converted into
single links (C-C) to form the polymeric chain during
the polymerization process, is called degree of conversion
(3, 5). The extent to which monomers react to form
the polymer during the polymerization reaction has
an important effect on the physical and mechanical
properties of composites resins (6-9).
Among the methods to evaluate the degree
of conversion of composite resins found in the
literature are optic and electronic microscopy, differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTA), high
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the
vibratory methods, such as Fourier transformation
infrared spectrometry (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy
and ultraviolet-visible spectrometry (UV-Vis).
Ultraviolet-visible spectrometry presents
the important characteristic of making it easy to
Degree of conversion of resin composites light activated by halogen light and led analyzed by
ultraviolet spectrometry
225
Optilux 401
(Demetron)
Optilight LD III
(Gnatus)
Light source
Active tip
Light intensity
(mW/cm)
Wavelength (nm)
(According to
Manufacturer)
Halogen
6 mm
500
400-500
LED
6 mm
650
470-490
YA
B
absorbance absorbance (x = 0)
concentration (y = 0)
226
Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF.
Results
The Charisma in shades A2 and SL
presented heterogeneous distribution, with a higher
percentage of residual monomers in shade SL when
compared with shade A2. The mean values were
expressed in the form of degree of conversion of
the polymers (% in mass) and are shown in Table 2.
The groups of resin composite A2 light activated with
halogen light and LED, at different times of 10, 20 and
Source
Halogen
Time
Mean
Standard
Deviation
C.V.(%)
10 s
78,39
A,B,C
2.56
3.27
20 s
81,15
A,B,C,D,E
6.22
7.66
40 s
81,29
A,B,C,E
5.51
6.78
10 s
75,95
A,B,C
3.51
4.63
20 s
77,43
A,B,C
3.54
4.57
40 s
78,79
A,B,C
3.82
4.85
10 s
89,12
B,D,E,F
2.34
2.62
20 s
88,64
B,C,D,E,F
5.40
6.09
40 s
90,37
D,E,F
3.27
3.62
10 s
87,01
B,C,D,E,F
0.92
1.06
20 s
88,25
B,C,D,E,F
1.40
1.59
40 s
87,59
B,C,D,E,F
1.68
1.92
A2
LED
Halogen
SL
LED
Discussion
The quantity of monomers still present in
resin composite samples submitted to various light
polymerization conditions was determined. The
degree of conversion of monomers into polymers,
expressed in percentage mass, was evaluated. This
was done by studying two shades of a resin composite, activated with a halogen lamp and a LED
Degree of conversion of resin composites light activated by halogen light and led analyzed by
ultraviolet spectrometry
227
228
Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF.
Conclusion
Based on the results obtained in this study,
it may be concluded that:
1) Resin composite SL presented the highest degree of conversion, irrespective
of the light polymerization time and
the light source used.
2) Resin composite A2 required a light
polymerization time of 20 and 40s
with halogen light to obtain the same
degree of conversion as that obtained
by resin SL.
References
1.
2.
3.
Degree of conversion of resin composites light activated by halogen light and led analyzed by
ultraviolet spectrometry
229
4.
Yap AU, Lee HK, Sabapathy R. Release of methacrylic acid from dental composites. Dent Mater.
2000;16(3):172-9.
5.
6.
7.
Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed
Mater Res. 1986;20(1):121-31.
8.
9.
18. Soh MS, Yap AU, Siow KS. The effectiveness of cure
of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity
depths. Oper Dent. 2003;28(6):707-15.
19. Uhl A, Sigusch BW, Jandt KD. Second generation
LEDs for the polymerization of oral biomaterials.
Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):80-7.
20. Musanje L, Ferracane JL. Effects of resin formulation
and nanofiller surface treatment on the properties of
experimental hybrid resin composite. Biomaterials.
2004;25(18):4065-71.
21. Witzel MF, Calheiros FC, Gonalves F, Kawano Y,
Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method
on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation
in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based
materials. J Dent. 2005;33(9):773-9.
22. Silverstein RM, Werster FX. Espectrometria no ultravioleta e infravermelho. In: Silverstein RM, Werster
FX. Identificao espectromtrica de compostos
orgnicos. 6a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Livro Tcnico e
Cientfico; 2000. p. 67-135
23. Yoshida K, Greener EH. Effect of photoinitiator on
degree of conversion of unfilled light-cured resin. J
Dent. 1994;22(5):296-9.
24. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite
depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting
diode technology. Br Dent J. 1999;24;186(8):388-91.
25. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and
their effects on wear and degree of conversion of
particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials.
2005;26(24):4932-7.
26. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of
water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity
of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins.
Biomaterials. 2003;24(4):655-65.
27. Tarumi H, Imazato S, Ehara A, Kato S, Ebi N, Ebisu
S. Post-irradiation polymerization of composites
containing Bis-GMA and TEGDMA. Dent Mater.
1999;15(4):238-42.
230
Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF.
Received: 02/02/2010
Recebido: 02/02/2010
Approved: 03/05/2010
Aprovado: 05/03/2010