Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PURP Demo
Thursday, 16-Apr-2015
Amman-Jordan
CO-PA will be used as Intercompany Sales datasource since Net Revenue and
Actual COGS are required to capture PURP
Page 1
Page 2
Product
code
Mapping
Page 4
Goods in Transit
-If Invoice is issued stock will be assumed as received by
Intercompany
Pros
-Do not need to reconcile Sender and Receiver
-If Good Received and Invoice is not is not an issue
Cons
Page 5
PURP
Master
Product
code
Mapping
Intercompany
Sales Transaction
PURP
Master
Page 7
Product
code
Mapping
PURP
Master
Page 8
PURP
Master
Page 9
RESULT
Issued to Production Data (MM)
PURP
Output from Production Data (MM)
Page 11
Material
Jazeera
Pharmaceutical
7LEXT106J-ALG
7LEXT106J-ALG
Production (MM)
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
Page 12
Scenario 1:
Company Code
Jazeera Pharmaceutical
Material
7LEXT106J-ALG
Page 13
7LEXT106J-ALG
Scenario 1:
Company Code
Material
Page 14
Scenario 1:
Company Code
Hikma Free Zone Jordan
Material
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
Scenario 1:
Company Code
Material
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
Material
Hikma Pharmaceuticals
3NOPFDSB1-ALG
Production (MM)
3LEXF1G12-ALGREG
Production (MM)
9NPFDSCR
Production (MM)
9NOPFDS
Production (MM)
3NOPF5510
Scenario 2:
Planned vs Developped
Corrections in Prototype 1
Work in Process
Reporting
WIP Solution
Release PURP with Production Quantity Issue
Pros
Similar to WIP in ECC
Cons
Production WIP
First month all the good issues will be done and only Partial Production
happens Therefore 400 PURP contribution goes to WIP
Second month only portion of the production goes from WIP to target product as
unit and PURP contribution
In the third month there is no production but TECO marked therefore the amount
in the WIP as PURP contribution goes to target product w/o quantity
Thank You!
Page 23