Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tacts, microcavitation with mass conser- tween the asperity contacts yields the 4.1 Test Specimen Run-in
vation and elastic-plastic deformations boundary friction. The adhesion compo- Every test combination was run in for
of the rough surfaces [8]. The integral nent is determined with a model based 15 min at 2000 N, 10 Hz and the test-spe-
solid body contact pressure curve is de- on [2]. Both components are calculated cific fuel temperature. Figure 5 contains
termined at the same time. on the microscopic level at measured the run-in characteristics of the test com-
surfaces of the run-in test specimens and, bination with the different fuels. Fig-
3.3 Friction Simulation like the flow factors and the integral sol- ure 5, left, individually presents the char-
The friction in the boundary and mixed id body contact pressure curve, this is acteristics of the maximum friction forc-
lubrication region results from a super- integrated in the equation as a function es for both directions of oscillation. The
imposition of fluid and boundary fric- of the gap height. GDK does not contain any additives that
tion, the percentage of fluid friction in facilitate formation of a boundary layer.
the boundary lubrication region ap- The friction slowly decreases and the tem-
proaching zero. The friction force is cal- 4 Test Program and Results perature increase in the pad is the high-
culated according to Eq. (2). The hydrody- est of all the fuels.
namic friction force Ffh results from the The boundary lubrication tests were in- The diesel compliant with DIN EN 590
lubricant shear. The friction force of the tended to reproduce the conditions in without RME exhibited similarly high
boundary lubrication Ffs is calculated the injection pump as precisely as possi- friction at the start. However, additizing
with a friction model as described in [6]. ble. Therefore, in addition to original the fuel enables a boundary layer to form
In this model, the total of the friction pump components, three representative faster. Lubrication with GDK and 5 %
forces caused by elastic-plastic deforma- fuel pump operating points were select- RME had the best effect on run-in, since
tions of the asperities and adhesion be- ed for load, stroke and velocity. Figure 4 fatty acid ester are able to bond to metal-
lic surfaces very well [9].
Figure 5: Run-in
characteristics
of the material
combination
100Cr6/16MnCrS5
at 2000 N, 10 Hz
and 80 °C
The fuel’s characteristics at high tempera fuel temperature. Additizing the GDK run-in friction bodies. Since, the friction
tures explain why the friction forces are with 5 % RME does not automatically bodies have convexities in a certain
higher for the tests at 120 °C than the lead to a more significant decrease of range, Table, the convexities of the speci-
tests for 80 °C. In addition to the already friction than the test with GDK without mens employed were determined pre-
high inlet temperature of the fuel of RME. However, there is substantially less cisely and incorporated in the model.
120 °C, the fuel in the contact is heated wear. This indicates that higher friction The circular pad was calculated with cen-
further by frictional heat. The tempera- does not automatically cause higher tric pivoting.
ture level produced likely interferes with wear, because wear only occurs if the
the development of the boundary layer. boundary layers are destroyed locally 5.1 Results of Simulation
The decrease in friction as the test time during the friction process. Figure 8 presents the integral results of the
advances can be explained with the ag- calculation for one oscillation cycle. As ex-
ing of the fuel, since it produces aging pected, the characteristic of the maximum
products that consequently enhance the 5 Thrust Bearing Simulation pressure follows the predetermined char-
lubricating effect. Figure 6, right, acteristic of the load. The solid contact ar-
presents the characteristic of the coeffi- The exact quantities of a test run on the ea ratio reveals that the contact pair oper-
cients of friction. oscillation test bench were utilized in ates in the boundary and mixed lubrica-
Figure 7 presents the results for the dif- the simulation to facilitate a comparison tion region all the time. The ramped load
ferent fuels at 6000 N and 17 Hz for 80 °C of measurement and calculation. The increase at the start of the cycle causes a
(left) and 120 °C (right). At an identical data of an operating point with 6000 N, hydrodynamic pressure buildup, which
inlet temperature, similar characteristics 17 Hz and 80 °C was employed as the can be attributed to the effects of hydrody-
and levels manifest themselves in each load and motion characteristic. The con- namic squeeze. The solid contact area ra-
case. However, in contrast to the other tact pair is lubricated with diesel compli- tio briefly drops back to approximately
fuels, substantially higher wear was ant with DIN EN 590. The flow factors, 84 % before increasing again and slightly
measured with GDK in both cases. All the integral solid body contact pressure dropping again shortly before the end of
the tests exhibited higher friction and curve and the boundary friction were the high load phase because of the im-
substantially higher wear at the higher calculated for measured surfaces of the proved hydrodynamic conditions brought
Figure 6: Compar-
ison of friction
force and coeffi-
cient of friction
for different oper-
ating points and
fuel temperatures
when lubricated
with diesel EN 590
about by the tipping of the pad while the The lubricant film ruptures, thus produc- of the pad, exists at the contact end. As
velocity simultaneously increases. The ing a large-area cavitation region, which is expected, a much lower pressure appears
rapid decrease in load during the transi- indicated by the stark drop in the mean in the low load range at t2 = 0.042 s. The
tion from the high to low load range caus- gap fill factor to a value of 55 %. aforementioned large-area cavitation re-
es the hydrodynamic pressures to collapse. Figure 9 presents the total pressure and gion is distinctly recognizable here.
The rebound of the friction bodies caused gap fill factor recorded instantaneously
by the high solid body contact pressure is for two times. The pressure distribution 5.2 Comparison of
a reason for this. This causes the height of in the high load range at t1 = 0.006 s is Measurement and Calculation
the lubricating gap to enlarge rapidly. The primarily shaped by the solid body con- Calculation and measurement may be
lubricant is unable to flow back into the tact pressure. A smaller cavitation region, compared by comparing the measured
freed up space fast enough from outside. which primarily results from the tipping and simulated friction force characteris-
Figure 8: Integral
results of the simula-
tion at 6000 N, 17 Hz
and 80 °C
Figure 9: Instantaneous total pressure and gap fill factor recorded for the two times t1 and t2
tics. The comparison of the friction force en knowledge about the tribological gated in tests with different materials
characteristics for one duty cycle in processes occurring in a diesel injec- and fuels. It was possible to identify the
Figure 10 yields a qualitatively and quan- tion pump’s thrust bearing under operating conditions under which a sta-
titatively good correspondence. An in- mixed and boundary lubrication condi- ble boundary layer develops and the
crease of the friction force at the start of tions and make it possible to simulate time at which the boundary layer can
the oscillation cycle, which results from this tribosystem. A test bench was devel- be expected to fail in conjunction with
the ramped increase in load, is easily oped which can be used to test the oscil- increased friction and increased wear.
recognizable in the characteristics. The lating self-aligning thrust bearing un- In parallel, a simulation model for the
hydrodynamic pressures from the der realistic conditions. transiently loaded thrust bearing was de-
squeeze, which are effective in this The influence of load, sliding veloci- veloped. While conserving the mass bal-
range, produce a sinusoidal characteris- ty, temperature and lubricant on the ance, it incorporates the formation of
tic of the increase in the friction force development of a boundary layer that cavitation regions as well as the depend-
and are reproduced equally by simula- reduces friction and wear were investi- ence of the lubricant’s viscosity on pres-
tion and measurement.
The maximum friction forces also dis-
play a good correspondence. Deviations
exist at the reversal points where the de- Figure 10: Com-
formations of the test specimen holder parison of calcu-
and its inertia cause a delayed friction lated and meas-
force reversal in the measurement sig- ured friction
nal. Other differences appear in the low force at 6000 N,
load range. Among other things, they 17 Hz and 80 °C
can be attributed to the load cell having
reached its lower measurement limit.
6 Summary