Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Changes in the inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching characteristics of TiO2 thin lms in response to
the addition of HBr, Cl2 and C2F6 to Ar gas were investigated. As the HBr, Cl2 and C2F6 concentration increased,
the etch rate increased; however, the etch prole degree of anisotropy followed a different trend. As HBr
concentration increased, the greatest anisotropic etch prole was obtained at 100% HBr, while the greatest
anisotropic etch prole was obtained at concentrations of 25% when etching was conducted under C2F6 and
Cl2. Field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed that 25% C2F6 generated the greatest vertical etch
prole; hence, etch parameters were varied at this concentration. The effects of rf power, dc-bias voltage and
gas pressure on the etch rate and etch prole were also investigated. The etch rate and degree of anisotropy in
the etch prole increased with increasing rf power and dc-bias voltage and decreasing gas pressure. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the lms etched under a C2F6/Ar gas mixture revealed the existence of
etch byproducts containing F (i.e. TiFx) over the lm. CxFy compounds were not detected on the lm surface,
probably due to contamination with atmospheric carbon.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The etching of electronic materials is a crucial step in the fabrication
of semiconductor devices because improper conditions can lead to
defects such as faceting, trenching, redeposition, and plasma damage
to the lm. There has been a continuous and rapid implementation of
new techniques and materials that could improve the scalability and
performance of these devices owing to a rapid density growth and
physical limitations of semiconductor storage devices [1].
Conventional inorganic hard masks such as SiO2 and SiC cannot be
employed in the next generation of electronic devices owing to their
low selectivity and severe faceting during etching. Metallic and organic
hard mask materials have been proposed as possible replacements for
previously conventional inorganic hard masks owing to their better
hard mask capabilities [2].
The etching of hard mask materials such as Ta, Ti, TiN and TiO2 under
several etch chemistries has recently been widely investigated [3,4].
TiO2 has received a great deal of attention due to its numerous applications in solar cells, light-emitting diodes, photo catalysts, photosplitting of water and gas sensors [5,6]. In the semiconductor industry,
TiO2 has been proposed as a replacement for SiO2 dielectrics of capacitors owing to its high dielectric constant and low leakage current [7,8],
Corresponding author at: 244E, 2nd building, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu,
Incheon, 402-751, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82 32 860 7473; fax: +82 32 872 0959.
E-mail address: cwchung@inha.ac.kr (C.W. Chung).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.055
0040-6090/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
and as a hard mask material owing to its high selectivity and strong
adhesion.
The etch properties of TiO2 thin lms under an inductively coupled
plasma (ICP) were previously investigated under Cl2, HBr, BCl3, CF4
and non-corrosive gases such as CH4/H2/Ar. The results of these studies
indicated that, as the concentration of halogen gas in the gas mixture
increases, the etch rate increases and aggressive etch parameters appear to produce further improvement of the etch rate and etch prole
[912].
The etch rates, etch selectivity, plasma modeling, etch mechanisms
and surface analysis of TiO2 thin lms have previously been discussed
[913], but physical evidence of redeposition-free etch proles with a
high degree of anisotropy is scarce. Development of nanoscale anisotropic etching processes for TiO2 thin lms and their characterization
is necessary for their future applications in semiconductor devices and
as a hard mask material.
In this study, we investigated the inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICPRIE) of TiO2 thin lms. The etch rate and etch prole
of a variety of gases (Cl2, HBr, C2F6, Ar) were examined, and the effects of
etch parameters including coil rf power, dc-bias voltage, gas pressure
and gas concentration on the etch prole and etch mechanism were investigated. The etch rates were obtained using a surface prolometer
and etch proles were observed by eld emission scanning electron
microscopy (FESEM). Additionally, the surface chemistry of TiO2 lms
under the proper etch gas was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS).
200
2. Experimental details
2
TiO2
PR
TiO2/PR
150
100
Selectivity
ICPRIE of TiO2 thin lms was conducted using HBr/Ar, Cl2/Ar and
C2F6/Ar gas mixtures. Additionally, 100 nm TiO2 thin lms were prepared on a SiO2/Si substrate by rf magnetron reactive sputtering using
a Ti target in a Ar (35 sccm)/O2 (5 sccm) atmosphere.
Photolithography was carried out on TiO2 thin lms using a 1.2 m
thick photoresist (PR: AZ1512) to pattern the lm. The lms were patterned as parallel lines of different widths. The TiO2 thin lms were
then etched using a conventional ICPRIE system (A-Tech System,
Korea) equipped with a main chamber and a load lock chamber. To dissipate the heat generated during the etching process while avoiding
damage to the sample, a cold uid around 12 C to 15 C was circulated
through the susceptor, while circular void channels between the substrate and the susceptor were lled with He to improve sample cooling.
High density plasma was generated by a coil located at the top of the
main chamber, that was connected to a 13.56 MHz rf power supply. To
control the kinetic energy of the ions generated on the plasma, a selfinduced dc bias voltage was generated by an rf power generator at
13.56 MHz that was capacitively coupled to the susceptor. The vacuum
condition of the main chamber was generated by a turbo molecular
pump backed up by a mechanical pump, making it possible to obtain
base pressures lower than (2.74) 104 Pa.
The HBr/Ar, Cl2/Ar and C2F6/Ar gas mixtures used as etch gases were
fed into the main chamber at a rate of 40 sccm. The etch rates, etch selectivity and etch proles of the TiO2 thin lm and photoresist were examined under varying concentrations of HBr/Ar, Cl2/Ar and C2F6/Ar.
Additionally, the effects of etch parameters such as ICP rf power, dcbias voltage to the substrate, and gas pressure on the etch rate and prole were investigated. Etch by products and the surface chemistry of
TiO2 lms prepared under the proper etch gas were analyzed by XPS.
The etch rates were obtained using a surface prolometer (Tencor P1) and etch proles were observed by FESEM (FESEM-Hitachi 4300SE) at
an operating voltage of 15 kV. Etch byproducts, the surface chemistry
and etch mechanism of TiO2 lms under the proper etch gas were analyzed by using an ex-situ K-alpha source XPS analyzer (ThermoScientic
K-Alpha). All XPS analysis samples were TiO2 thin lms without photoresist. To remove any contamination from the lm surface, all samples
were Argon pre-sputtered for 30 s at beam acceleration energy and
beam current of 1 keV and 2 A, respectively. The binding energies
were calibrated using Au 4f7/2 = 84.00 eV as a reference.
21
50
25
50
75
100
% HBr in HBr/Ar
Fig. 1. Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying TiO2
concentrations in HBr/Ar mixtures and the following etch conditions: ICP rf power of
800 W, dc bias voltage of 300 V and gas pressure of 0.667 Pa.
increased from 25% to 75% (Fig. 2(c) to (e)), there was a slight improvement in the etch slope and no redeposition could be seen near the sidewall. At 100% HBr (Fig. 2(f)), the etch slope clearly improved relative to
other samples, but the angle was still less than 60. In general, the introduction of 25% HBr was sufcient to obtain a slanted, but redeposition
free etch prole that improved as concentration increased.
Fig. 3 depicts the etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and the etch selectivity
of TiO2 over PR etched under a Cl2/Ar gas mixture. The etch rate slowly
increased from a minimum of 23.81 nm/min at 100% Ar gas to a
maximum of 134.76 nm/min at 100% Cl2. The etch rate of PR underwent
a steeper increase from a minimum of 22.02 nm/min to a maximum of
447.6 nm/min. The etch selectivity showed a maximum value of 1.08 at
100% Ar that gradually decreased to its minimum value of 0.3 at 100%
Cl2.
Fig. 4 depicts the FESEM micrographs of the TiO2 thin lms etched
under various Cl2/Ar concentrations. Fig. 4(a) and (b) shows the
transition of the etch prole from 100% Ar and 25% Cl2/Ar, respectively.
The sample etched in pure Ar showed heavy sidewall redeposition,
while the prole of the sample etched at 25% Cl2 improved considerably.
A further increase in Cl2 concentration led to negative effects on the etch
prole degree of anisotropy (Fig. 4(c) to (d)).
Fig. 5 shows the etch rate and selectivity of the TiO2 thin lms etched
under C2F6/Ar gas mixture at varying concentrations. The etch rate of
TiO2 and PR increased from a minimum of 23.81 nm/min and 22.02
nm/min at 100% Ar to a maximum of 105.6 nm/min and 221.2 nm/min
at 100% C2F6, respectively. The etch selectivity gradually decreased
from a maximum of 1.08 at 100% Ar to a minimum of 0.477 at 100%
C2F6. The etch selectivity of TiO2 thin lms over PR mask showed the tendency of slightly decreasing with increasing C2F6 concentration, while
the etch rate increased. Although an unsaturated uorocarbon protective layer is formed when the lms are etched in a C2F6/Ar plasma, the
etch rate of PR is so fast that the sidewall of TiO2 cannot be properly
protected. It is believed that the etch selectivity of TiO2 lm over PR
mask can somehow inuence the overall etch prole. Fig. 6 shows the
FESEM micrographs of the TiO2 samples etched under a variety of C2F6
concentrations. The TiO2 samples etched in pure Ar showed heavy sidewall redeposition (Fig. 6(a)), while the addition of 25% C2F6 to Ar gas
(Fig. 6(b)) revealed an etch slope with a high degree of anisotropy. As
the C2F6 concentration increased from 50% to 100% (Fig. 6(c) to (e)),
the etch slope became more slanted and the surface roughness increased
considerably. At 100% C2F6, the formation of an area near the sidewall
that differed in height from the rest of the lm was clearly evident.
These ndings suggest the existence of a polymer layer, presumably
containing CxFy compounds, over the surface.
All halogen gas chemistries explored above showed a chemical enhancement of the TiO2 etch rate over pure Ar sputtering, but the etch
22
(a)
(b)
300nm
Photoresist
TiO2
SiO2
TiO2
(d)
(c)
(e)
(f)
Fig. 2. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms before etching (a) and etched in (b) pure argon, (c) 25% HBr, (d) 50% HBr, (e) 75% HBr, and (f) 100% HBr.
rate of TiO2 thin lms in Cl2/Ar was the fastest, followed by C2F6/Ar and
HBr/Ar. The high etch rates in the Cl2/Ar gas mixture may be associated
with the higher total ux of neutral reactive species, as well as the
higher volatility of TiClx etch byproducts compared to TiBrx etch by
products [11]. Both Cl2/Ar and HBr/Ar appear to follow an ion enhanced
etching mechanism commonly known as reactive ion etching [14]. The
500
2
PR
TiO2/PR
400
300
1
200
Selectivity
TiO2
100
0
25
50
75
100
% Cl2 in Cl2/Ar
Fig. 3. Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying TiO2
concentrations in Cl2/Ar mixtures and the following etch conditions: ICP rf power of
800 W, dc bias voltage of 300 V and gas pressure of 0.667 Pa.
etch rates of TiO2 thin lms under SF6/Ar gas mixtures have been reported to be much faster than those under Cl2/Ar gas mixtures, which brings
into question the reasons why the etch rates of TiO2 thin lms etched
under a C2F6/Ar gas mixture were considerably lower than those obtained under a Cl2/Ar gas mixture [9]. We believe that etching of TiO2 thin
lms in a C2F6/Ar gas mixture is hindered by the formation of an inhibition layer over the lm, similar to those generated in response to freon
feed gases (e.g., C2F6 and CHF4) that yield unsaturated polymer-forming
species in plasmas [14].
The SEM micrographs of the TiO2 thin lms etched under HBr/Ar,
Cl2/Ar and C2F6/Ar revealed that the best etch prole was obtained at
25% C2F6/Ar. We believe that there is a balance between the formation
of an inhibition layer and its removal by the effect of Ar sputtering at
this concentration, which helps maintain the high degree of anisotropy
in the etch slope. Based on the results obtained upon etching of TiO2 thin
lms in varying gas mixtures and concentrations, 25% C2F6 was selected
as the standard gas concentration for evaluation of the etching parameters due to its degree of anisotropy and plasma stability. The standard
conditions were 25% C2F6 in a C2F6/Ar gas mixture at an ICP rf power
of 800 W, dc-bias voltage to substrate of 300 V and gas pressure of
0.67 Pa.
Fig. 7(a) shows the etch rates of TiO2 thin lms and PR together with
the selectivity of TiO2 thin lms to PR for a variation of ICP power while
the other conditions were xed. As the ICP rf power increased from
700 W to 900 W, the etch rates of TiO2 thin lms and PR increased
23
(b)
(a)
300nm
(c)
(d)
(e)
Fig. 4. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms etched in (a) pure argon, (b) 25% Cl2, (c) 50% Cl2, (d) 75% Cl2, and (e) 100% Cl2.
and etch selectivity increased slightly. The increase in the etch rate of
TiO2 thin lms as rf power increased can be attributed to an increase
of both neutral species and ions. The increase in rf power causes increases in the densities and uxes of positive ions and F atoms through
an increase in both dissociation and ionization rates, which leads to an
200
1
100
25
50
75
100
Selectivity
TiO2
PR
TiO2/PR
% C2F6 in C2F6/Ar
Fig. 5. Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying TiO2
concentrations in C2F6/Ar mixtures and the following etch conditions: ICP rf power of
800 W, dc bias voltage of 300 V and gas pressure of 0.667 Pa.
increase in the etch rate of TiO2 thin lms [12]. FESEM micrographs of
TiO2 thin lms etched at various ICP rf powers are shown in
Fig. 7(b) to (d). The etch prole of the sample etched at 700 W shows
a slanted etch slope with no redeposition near the sidewall (Fig. 7(b)).
Fig. 7(c) depicts the sample etched at 800 W (standard conditions).
The etch prole seemed to be similar to those observed in response to
varying C2F6/Ar concentrations, suggesting good reproducibility. As
the rf power increased to 900 W (Fig. 7(d)), the etch slope appeared
to improve slightly compared to TiO2 thin lms etched at 800 W.
The effects of dc-bias voltage on the etch rates and selectivity of the
TiO2 thin lms and PR are presented in Fig. 8(a). As the DC bias increased from 200 V to 400 V, the etch rate of both TiO2 thin lms and
PR rapidly increased relative to the rf power variation. The etch selectivity of TiO2 thin lms to PR steadily increased from 200 V to 300 V, but a
further increase in the dc bias to 400 V caused a decrease in the etch selectivity. FESEM micrographs revealed that the etch slope became
slanted and the etch depth near the sidewall differed greatly from the
average etch depth at a dc-bias voltage of 200 V (Fig. 8(b)). The etch
slope at a dc-bias voltage of 400 V (Fig. 8(c)) was steeper than that at
200 V. The increase in dc-bias voltage caused an increase in the overall
ion energy, increasing the ion bombardment onto the lm surface.
This caused an expedited increase in the sputtering effect of the lm
that enhanced the bond breaking and desorption of etch products
from the TiO2 surface, resulting in an increased etch rate and improved
etch prole.
24
(a)
(b)
300nm
(c)
(d)
(e)
Fig. 6. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms etched in (a) pure argon, (b) 25% C2F6, (c) 50% C2F6, (d) 75% C2F6, and (e) 100% C2F6.
Fig. 9(a) shows the etch rate and selectivity of TiO2 thin lms etched
at different gas pressures. As pressure increased from 0.133 Pa to
1.33 Pa, the etch rate of the TiO2 thin lms and PR decreased, while
the etch selectivity of TiO2 over PR decreased slightly. The SEM micrograph of the sample etched at 0.133 Pa (Fig. 9(b)) revealed a steep
etch slope with no visible redeposition along the sidewall, while the
etch prole of the sample etched at 1.33 Pa (Fig. 9(c)) exhibited a
slanted etch slope. In general, lowering the pressure leads to a proportional decrease in the concentration of neutral etchant, while the relative rate of energetic ion-enhanced etching increases [15]. At low
pressures (0.133 Pa), ion bombardment onto the sample is enhanced
because high energy and low incident angle ions are abundant due to
the large mean free path. This results in an increased etch rate and degree of anisotropy of the etch prole. Conversely, at high pressures
(1.33 Pa), many ions with relatively low energy and high-incident angles exist. The lack of high energy ions and diminished ion bombardment consequently reduce the etch rate due to inefcient TiO bond
breaking and/or the formation of a greater amount of etch byproducts.
We suspect that the increase in neutral active species (chemical etching) at high pressures results in the formation of a polymer layer over
the lm, which reduces the etch rate and degree of anisotropy of the
etch prole [14,16].
TiO2
(a)
PR
TiO2/PR
200
Selectivity
250
25
150
100
50
0
700
800
900
rf power
(b)
(c)
300nm
(d)
Fig. 7. (a) Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying coil rf power and the following etch conditions: 25% C2F6 in C2F6/Ar gas mixture, dc bias voltage of
300 V and gas pressure of 0.667 Pa. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms etched at the following coil rf power: (b) 700 W, (c) 800 W, and (d) 900 W.
26
TiO2
200
(a)
PR
TiO2/PR
150
Selectivity
250
100
50
0
200
300
400
dc bias
(b)
(c)
300nm
Fig. 8. (a) Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying dc-bias voltage and etch conditions of: 25% C2F6 in C2F6/Ar gas mixture, ICP rf power of 900 W and
gas pressure of 0.667 Pa. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms etched at the following coil rf power: (b) 200 V and (c) 400 V.
(a)
TiO2
PR
TiO2/PR
200
Selectivity
250
150
100
50
0
10
Pressure
(b)
(c)
300nm
Fig. 9. (a) Etch rate of TiO2 thin lms and PR, and etch selectivity of TiO2/PR under varying gas pressures and etch conditions of: 25% C2F6 in C2F6/Ar gas mixture, ICP rf power of 900 W and
dc bias voltage of 300 V. FESEM micrographs of TiO2 thin lms etched at varying gas pressures of: (b) 0.133 Pa and (c) 1.33 Pa.
(a)
75% C2F6/Ar
25% C2F6 /Ar
(b)
F 1s
Intensity (arb.unit)
Intensity (arb.unit)
Ti 2p3/2
27
75% C2F6/Ar
As deposited
As deposited
462
460
458
456
454
690
688
686
684
682
680
Fig. 10. XPS narrow scans of the Ti 2p3/2 (a) and F 1s (b) spectra for TiO2 thin lms etched under the following etch conditions: ICP rf power of 800 W, dc bias voltage of 300 V and process
pressure of 0.667 Pa.
[4] Jong-Chang Woo, Yoon-Soo Chun, Young-Hee Joo, Chang-II Kim, The dry etching
property of TiO2 thin lms using metal-insulatormetal capacitor in inductively
coupled plasma system, Vacuum 86 (2012) 2152.
[5] Shengwei Liu, Yu. Jiaguo, Mietek Jaroniec, Anatase TiO2 with dominant highenergy {001} facets: synthesis, properties, and applications, Chem. Mater. 23
(2011) 4085.
[6] Shengwei Liu, Yu. Jiaguo, Mietek Jaroniec, A review of growth mechanism, structure
and crystallinity of anodized TiO2 nanotubes, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 74 (2013) 377.
[7] N. Rausch, E.P. Burte, Thin TiO2 lm prepared by low pressure chemical vapor deposition, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) 145.
[8] Seong Keun Kim, Wan-Don Kim, Kyung-Min Kim, Hwang Cheol Seong, Jaehack
Jeong, High dielectric constant TiO2 thin lms on a Ru electrode grown at 250 C
by atomic-layer deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 4112.
[9] S. Norasetthekul, P.Y. Park, K.H. Baik, K.P. Lee, J.H. Shin, B.S. Jeong, V. Shishodia, E.S.
lambers, D.P. Norton, S.J. Pearton, Dry etch chemistries for TiO2 thin lms, Appl. Surf.
Sci. 185 (2001) 27.
[10] Young-Hee Joo, Jong-Chang Woo, Chang IL Kim, Dry etching properties of TiO2 thin
lms using inductively coupled plasma for resistive random access memory application, Tran. Electr. Electron. Mater. 13 (2012) 144.
[11] Daehee Kim, Alexander Efremov, Hanbyeol Jang, Sungchil Kang, Sun Jin Yun,
Kwang-Ho Kwon, Etching characteristics and mechanism of TiO2 thin lms in
HBr/Cl2/Ar inductively coupled plasma, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 (2012) 106201,1.
[12] Kyung-Rok Choi, Jong-Chang Woo, Young-Hee Joo, Yoon-Soo Chun, Chang-Il
Kim, Dry etching properties of TiO2 thin lms in O2/CF4/Ar, Vacuum 92 (2013)
85.
[13] Hanbyeol Jang, Alexander Efremov, Daehee Kim, Sungchil Kang, Sun Jin Yun,
Kwang-Ho Kwon, Etching characteristics and mechanism of TiO2 thin lms in
HBr/Ar and Cl2/Ar inductively-coupled plasmas, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 32
(2012) 333.
[14] W.W. Stoffels, E. Stoffels, K. Tachibana, Polymerization of uorocarbons in reactive
ion etching plasmas, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16 (1998) 87.
[15] Denis M. Manos, Daniel L. Flamm, Plasma Etching, Academic Press, London, 1989.
[16] Hye Sang Park, Sung Jin Kim, Yan Qing Wu, Jae Koo Lee, Effects of plasma chamber
pressure on the etching on micro structures in SiO2 with the charging effects, IEEE
Trans. Plasma Sci. 31 (2003) 703.
[17] D. Guerin, S. Ismat Shah, Reactive sputtering of titanium oxide thin lms, J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. A 15 (1997) 712.
[18] P.J. Matsuo, T.E.F.M. Standaert, S.D. Allen, G.S. Oehrlein, T.J. Dalton, Characterization
of Al, Cu, and TiN surface cleaning following a low-K dielectric etch, J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 17 (4) (1999) 1435.
[19] T. Yamaki, T. Sumita, S. Yamamoto, Formation of TiO2 xFx compounds in uorineimplanted TiO2, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 21 (2002) 33.
[20] Surajit Kumar Hazra, Nam-kuk Kim, Jaehong Park, Byoungdoo Choi, Sangmin
Lee, Tae-young Choi, Dong-Il Dan Cho, Gettering by CF4-Ar plasma-treated titanium within anodically bonded glasssilicon microcavities, Sens. Mater. 21
(2009) 37.