Professional Documents
Culture Documents
break
down
of
relationships
(under
the
some
other
substantial
reason
clause).
Alternatively,
employers
may
rely
on
redundancy.[8]
[9]
A
National
Guardian
that
can
not
intervene
in
this
highly
damaging
strategy
against
whistleblowers
will
provide
no
meaningful
protection.
The
most
that
the
National
Guardian
will
do
is
report
failing
employers
to
bodies
that
have
been
part
of
the
problem:
the
Care
Quality
Commission,
Monitor,
the
Trust
Development
Authority
and
NHS
England.
The
National
Guardian
would
not
have
protected
Raj
Mattu,
a
whistleblowing
cardiologist.
An
employment
tribunal
ruled
last
year
that
Mattu
was
blameless
and
unfairly
sacked
after
voicing
concerns
about
patient
safety.
An
astonishing
campaign
was
waged
against
Mattu:
Soon,
the
single
complaint
against
Mattu
had
become
35,
then
200,
ranging
from
questions
over
his
qualifications
to
charges
of
serious
criminal
conduct
outside
of
work.
These
were
sent
to
the
GMC,
CQC,
the
Strategic
Health
Authority
and
three
different
police
forces;
by
2009,
all
had
been
investigated
and
found
to
be
false.
Mattu
was
also
subject
to
three
separate
tax
inquiries,
despite
having
undertaken
no
private
work.
In
2010,
ill
and
suffering
from
depression,
he
was
finally
sacked
by
managers
who
questioned
the
validity
of
his
ailments
and
found
him
unmanageable.[10]
This
protracted,
costly
employment
dispute
would
have
put
Mattu
well
beyond
the
protection
of
the
National
Guardian.
Moreover
whilst
the
National
Guardian
is
nominally
independent,
the
postholder
will
be
hand
picked
and
overseen
by
CQC,
who
are
firmly
under
the
DHs
thumb.
As
the
National
Guardian
will
not
be
in
post
until
April
2016
at
the
earliest,
more
whistleblower
cases
will
be
consigned
to
the
dustbin
category
of
historic,
and
sealed
away.
This
is
all
a
far
cry
from
an
equivalent
USA
office
(Office
of
Special
Counsel).
This
can
independently
investigate,
remedy
employment
detriment
whilst
a
whistleblower
is
in
post
and
litigate.
The
worst
NHS
organisations
ignored
good
practice
guidance
for
years.
The
National
Guardian
office
is
an
irrelevant
addition
and
wastes
public
funds.
However,
it
provides
a
smokescreen
for
suppression
by
government.
Central
bodies
chant
the
mantra
protect
whistleblowers
whilst
still
authorising
settlements
with
super
gags,
which
hide
even
the
existence
of
settlements.
Last
year,
some
whistleblowers
were
too
scared
to
participate
in
the
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
Review
because
they
were
subject
to
confidentiality
clauses.
Hunt
pays
lip
service
to
aviation-style
safety.
This
requires
properly
independent
investigations,
but
Francis
ignored
many
calls
for
a
truly
independent
mechanism
for
whistleblower
governance.
His
review
report
is
totally
silent
about
the
grave
nature
and
scale
of
the
disclosures
reported
to
him.
We
have
learned
that
Francis
ignored
even
Simons
Stevens,
who
on
behalf
of
NHS
England
called
for
independent
investigation,
safe
harbour
and
an
Ombudsman.
[11]
Similarly,
it
is
evident
that
DH
ignored
the
CQCs
suggestion
that
the
National
Guardian
could
be
located
with
the
proposed
NHS
independent
patient
safety
investigation
service
(IPSIS).[7]
Independence
and
full
transparency
are
plainly
resisted
by
government.
Francis
complaisance
is
very
disappointing.
Last
October,
we
attended
a
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
seminar
at
which
Francis
openly
stated
that
he
would
only
make
recommendations
that
would
be
accepted.
Francis
review
is
a
comprehensive
failure
in
terms
of
duty
of
care
to
staff
and
patients.
However,
it
suits
the
DH
very
well.
The
stream
of
victimised
and
sacked
whistleblowers
has
been
undiminished.
Cases
continue
to
be
raised
in
parliament.
However,
when
whistleblowers
approach
Jeremy
Hunt
and
DH
for
safe
haven,
they
are
still
told
that
DH
does
not
intervene
in
employment
matters.
Accordingly,
whistleblowers
will
continue
to
press
for
proper
learning
through
a
public
inquiry,
and
real
measures
to
protect
those
who
speak
up
in
future.
The
NHS
is
under
increasing
pressure.
Staff
have
many
concerns
that
they
need
to
raise.
It
is
unjust
to
expect
them
to
sacrifice
health
and
livelihood
simply
for
standing
up
for
patients.
Authors
Minh
Alexander
is
a
whistleblower
and
was
formerly
an
NHS
consultant
psychiatrist
@minh_alexander
David
Drew
is
a
whistleblower
and
was
formerly
a
NHS
consultant
paediatrician.
He
is
the
author
of
Little
Stories
of
Life
and
Death.
@nhswhistleblowr
[1]
Hunt:
Sweeping
reforms
to
end
NHS
cover
up
culture.
Laura
Donnelly
&
Patrick
Sawer,
Telegraph
7
February
2015
[2]
Report
of
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
Review
by
Sir
Robert
Francis
QC,
11
February
2015
[3]
Learning
Not
Blaming,
The
government
response
to
the
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
consultation,
the
Public
Administration
Select
Committee
report
Investigating
Clinical
Incidents
in
the
NHS',
and
the
Morecambe
Bay
Investigation.
16
July
2015
[4]
National
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
Guardian,
CQC
board
paper
29
July
2015http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/CM071506_Item_6_Freedom_to_Speak_up_Nati
onal_Guardian.pdf
[5]
Critique
of
Francis
model
of
trust
appointed
Guardians,
Minh
Alexander
4
June
2015
http://sharmilachowdhury.com/2015/06/21/critique-of-francis-model-of-trust-appointed-
guardians/
[6]
Francis
calls
for
new
protection
for
whistleblowers.
Shaun
Lintern,
Nursing
Times,
11
February
2013
[7]
CQCs
submission
to
DH
consultation
on
implementation
of
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
Review
http://twitdoc.com/view.asp?id=211107&sid=4IW3&ext=PDF&lcl=DH-Consult-CQC-
20150603-FTSU-DH-consultation-response.pdf&usr=Minh_Alexander&doc=272545800&key=key-
8O60eydHWtpxxMI8vznp
[8]
21
Ways
to
Skin
a
Whistleblower
from
Shoot
the
messenger,
Private
Eye
Special,
Andrew
Bousefield
and
Phil
Hammond
2011
[9]
Thematic
Review
of
70
cases,
by
Patrick
Green
QC
et
al,
submitted
on
behalf
of
Patients
First
to
Freedom
to
Speak
Up
Review,
September
2014
[10]
There
were
hundreds
of
us
crying
out
for
help:
the
afterlife
of
the
whistleblower.
Andrew
Smith.
Guardian
22
November
2014
[11]
Letter
from
Simon
Stevens
CEO
NHS
England
to
Sir
Robert
Francis
QC,
22
September
2014
http://twitdoc.com/view.asp?id=211953&sid=4JJL&ext=PDF&lcl=Simon-Stevens-
toRobertFrancis.pdf&usr=Minh_Alexander&doc=272974968&key=key-NEY87NHor4PDtvGrRsyk
Competing
interests:
No
competing
interests