You are on page 1of 2

5652 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

25 / Wednesday, February 7, 2007 / Proposed Rules

promulgation of a final rule or NOAA (AA), no later than 60 days after • Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
regulation that is a significant regulatory the publication of the final rule in the Administrator, Southwest Region,
action under E.O. 12866 and is likely to Federal Register. The prohibitions of NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
have a significant adverse effect on the this section apply to these activities 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213.
supply, distribution, or use of energy. upon the AA’s rejection of the • Phone: (562)980–4024.
Although the regulations addressed in application as insufficient, upon • Fax: (562) 980–4047.
this rule have been determined to be issuance or denial of authorization, or 6 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
significant for the purposes of E.O. months after the publication of the final Chris Fanning, Southwest Region,
12866, we have determined that the rule in the Federal Register, whichever NMFS, (562) 980–4198 or (562) 980–
energy effects are unlikely to exceed the occurs earliest. 4030.
energy impact thresholds identified in * * * * * SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
E.O. 13211. Therefore, this proposed [FR Doc. E7–2010 Filed 2–6–07; 8:45 am] 18, 2006, NMFS published a notice (71
action is not a significant energy action, BILLING CODE 3510–22–S FR 47779) revising the methodology to
and no Statement of Energy Effects is create a vessel list for 2006 for vessels
required. eligible to fish for albacore tuna in
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 223 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Canadian waters. The 1981 Treaty
Between the Government of the United
Endangered and threatened species, National Oceanic and Atmospheric States of America and the Government
Exports, Imports, Transportation. Administration of Canada on Pacific Coast Albacore
Dated: February 1, 2007. Tuna Vessels and Port Privileges
Samuel D. Rauch III, 50 CFR Part 300 (Treaty), as amended in 2002,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for [Docket No. 070119012–7012–01; I.D. establishes a number of obligations for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine 010307B] both countries to control reciprocal
Fisheries Service. fishing in waters of one country by
RIN 0648–AU78
For the reasons set out in the vessels of the other country. One
preamble, 50 CFR part 223 is proposed Pacific Albacore Tuna Fisheries; obligation is that each country is
to be amended as follows: Vessel List to Establish Eligibility to required to annually provide to the
Fish for Albacore Tuna in Canadian other country a list of its fishing vessels
PART 223—THREATENED MARINE Waters Under the U.S.–Canada that are expected to fish for Pacific
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES Albacore Tuna Treaty albacore tuna off the coast of the other
country during the upcoming fishing
1. The authority citation for part 223 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries season, generally June through October
continues to read as follows: Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and each year.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531–1543; subpart B, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), As described in the 2004 final rule
§ 223.201 202 also issued under 16 U.S.C. Commerce. implementing amendments to the
1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for ACTION: Proposed rule; request for Treaty (69 FR 31531, June 4, 2004), and
§ 223.206(d)(9). comments. codified at 50 CFR 300.172, the list must
2. In § 223.203, paragraphs (a), (b) include vessel and owner name,
introductory text, and (b)(2) are revised SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to develop a address, and phone number; USCG
to read as follows: new vessel list at the beginning of each documentation number (or state
calendar year of U.S. vessels eligible to registration if not documented); vessel
§ 223.203 Anadromous fish. fish for albacore tuna in Canadian operator (if different from the owner)
* * * * * waters. The vessel list would revert to and his or her address with phone
(a) Prohibitions. The prohibitions of zero vessels on December 31 of each number. Each U.S. vessel must be on the
section 9(a)(1) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. year, unless NMFS receives a notice for list for at least 7 days prior to engaging
1538(a)(1)) relating to endangered a vessel to be added to the list for the in fishing under the Treaty. This is
species apply to fish with an intact upcoming year, with the requisite intended to ensure that both countries
adipose fin that are part of the information. This proposed regulation have equal information as to eligible
threatened species of salmonids listed would clarify that the vessel list will vessels. U.S. and Canadian enforcement
in § 223.102(c)(3) through (c)(23). remain valid for a single calendar year. officers need up-to-date lists of eligible
(b) Limits on the prohibitions. The Updating the list every year is intended vessels to adequately enforce the Treaty.
limits to the prohibitions of paragraph to facilitate the United States’ obligation Vessel owners who wish their vessels
(a) of this section relating to threatened to annually provide Canada a current remain on, or be added to, the vessel list
species of salmonids listed in list of U. S. vessels that are likely to fish must contact NMFS at the address
§ 223.102(c)(3) through (c)(23) are albacore off the coast of Canada. specified at 50 CFR 300.171 (definition
described in the following paragraphs DATES: Comments must be received by of ‘‘Regional Administrator’’), which is
(b)(1) through (b)(13): 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time March 9, the address that appears in the
* * * * * 2007. ADDRESSES section above and provide
(2) The prohibitions of paragraph (a) ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the required information. NMFS will
of this section relating to threatened on this proposed rule, identified by [I.D. notify fishermen by a confirmation letter
Puget Sound steelhead listed in 010307B] by any of the following or email of the date the request to be on
§ 223.102(c)(23) do not apply to methods: the list was received.
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

activities specified in an application for • E-mail: albacore.fish@noaa.gov. Before the 2006 fishing season June
ESA 4(d) authorization for scientific Include the I.D. number in the subject through October, NMFS did not require
purposes or to enhance the conservation line of the message. owners of albacore fishing vessels that
or survival of the species, provided that • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:// wanted their vessels to be on the list of
the application has been received by the www.regulations.gov. Follow the U. S. vessels eligible to fish for albacore
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, instructions for submitting comments. tuna in Canadian waters under the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:08 Feb 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07FEP1.SGM 07FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 7, 2007 / Proposed Rules 5653

Treaty to contact NMFS. Instead, NMFS 0.08 hours per vessel or about 5 minutes Dated: February 1, 2007.
relied on a lengthy list created from each, including the time for reviewing Samuel D. Rauch III,
information provided by industry that instructions, searching existing data Deputy Assistant Administrator For
was not readily verifiable nor did it sources, gathering and maintaining the Regulatory Programs, National Marine
indicate whether each vessel owner data needed, and completing and Fisheries Service.
actually wished to fish for albacore tuna reviewing the collection of information.
in Canada for any given year. The result The only expected cost to a vessel For the reasons set out in the
was that NMFS was not able to provide owner requesting to be on the eligible preamble, NMFS proposes to amend
the Canadian Government an updated list will be the cost associated with part 300 as follows:
vessel list of vessels owners who contacting NMFS by mail, fax, phone, or
intended to fish for albacore tuna in PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
email. NMFS also does not anticipate a
Canada for a particular fishing season. drop in profitability based on this rule, FISHERIES REGULATIONS
With this proposed rule, NMFS would as it should not have a significant effect
amend 50 CFR 300.172 to state 1. The authority citation for part 300
on the fishermen’s ability to harvest
explicitly that the vessel list is effective continues to read as follows:
HMS. Therefore, the proposed action, if
for only one calender year and will be implemented, will not have a significant Authority: Sec. 401, Pub. L. 108–219, 118
recompiled beginning on January 1 of impact on a substantial number of small Stat. 616 (16 U.S.C. 1821 note).
each year. Additional vessels may be entities. 2. Section 300.172 is revised to read
added to the list throughout the year in as follows:
Based on the analysis above, the Chief
accordance with 50 CFR 300.172.
Counsel for Regulation of the
Classification Department of Commerce has § 300.172 Vessel list.

The Regional Administrator, NMFS determined that there will not be a The ‘‘vessel list’’ is the list of U.S.
Southwest Region, determined that this significant economic impact to a vessels that are authorized to fish under
proposed rule is consistent with the substantial number of these small the Treaty as amended in 2002. Only a
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery entities. As a result, a regulatory vessel on the list for at least 7 days may
Conservation and Management Act, 16 flexibility analysis is not required and engage in fishing in Canadian waters
U.S.C. 1801 et seq. none has been prepared. under the Treaty as amended in 2002.
This proposed rule has been This proposed rule for revising the The owner of any U.S. vessel that
determined to be not significant for the methodology for developing the list of wishes to be eligible to fish for albacore
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) vessels eligible to fish for albacore tuna tuna under the Treaty as amended in
12866. in Canadian waters under the U.S. 2002 must provide the Regional
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of Canada Albacore Tuna Treaty presents Administrator or his designee with the
the Department of Commerce certified contains a collection-of-information vessel name, the owner’s name and
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the requirement subject to the Paperwork
Small Business Administration that this address, phone number where the
Reduction Act (PRA) that has been owner can be reached, the U.S. Coast
proposed rule, if adopted, would not approved by OMB under control
have a significant economic impact on Guard documentation number (or state
number 0648–0492. Public reporting registration number if not documented),
a substantial number of small entities as burden for requesting to be placed on
follows: and vessel operator (if different from the
the list of vessels eligible to fish in
A fishing vessel is considered a owner) and his or her address and
Canadian waters is estimated to average
‘‘small’’ business by the U.S. Small phone number. On the date that NMFS
0.08 hours per vessel or about 5 minutes
Business Administration (SBA) if its each, including the time for reviewing receives a request that includes all the
annual receipts are not in excess of $4.0 instructions, searching existing data required information, NMFS will place
million (NAICS Code 114111). Because sources, gathering and maintaining the the vessel on the annual vessel list.
all of the vessels fishing for HMS have data needed, and completing and NMFS will notify fishermen by a
annual receipts below $4.0 million, they reviewing the collection of information. confirmation letter or email of the date
would all be considered small Send comments regarding this burden the vessel was placed on the list.
businesses under the SBA standards. estimate, or any other aspect of this data Because the vessel list will revert to zero
Therefore this rule will not create collection, including suggestions for vessels on December 31 of each year, the
disproportionate costs between small reducing the burden, to NMFS (see required information must be provided
and large vessels/businesses. Based on ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to in the manner specified on an annual
historic interest and recent U.S. DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to basis.
participation in 2006, NMFS anticipates (202) 395–7285. [FR Doc. E7–2045 Filed 2–6–07; 8:45 am]
that the rule could impact
approximately 100 vessels annually. Notwithstanding any other provision BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

The revision of the methodology for of the law, no person is required to


developing the list of vessels eligible to respond to, nor shall any person be
fish for albacore tuna in Canadian subject to a penalty for failure to comply
waters under the U.S. Canada Albacore with, a collection of information subject
Tuna Treaty presents little burden to the to the requirements of the PRA, unless
public. The submission of a request by that collection of information displays a
a vessel owner with the required currently valid OMB Control Number.
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS

information as a result of this new List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300


regulation is expected to present a
minimal burden. The public reporting Fisheries, High seas fishing,
burden for requesting to be placed on International agreements, Permits,
the list of vessels eligible to fish in Reporting and recordkeeping
Canadian waters is estimated to average requirements.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:08 Feb 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07FEP1.SGM 07FEP1

You might also like