You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices 27299

III. Date of Effectiveness of the without change; the Commission does Investigation (‘‘FBI’’) (the fingerprint
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for not edit personal identifying processing arm of the Office of the
Commission Action information from submissions. You Attorney General of the United States).
Within 35 days of the date of should submit only information that The FBI identifies submitted
publication of this notice in the Federal you wish to make publicly available. All fingerprints, retrieves relevant criminal
Register or within such longer period (i) submissions should refer to File history information, and returns
as the Commission may designate up to Number SR–Amex–2006–34 and should fingerprint reports (including the
90 days of such date if it finds such be submitted on or before May 31, 2006. original paper fingerprint cards, if any)
longer period to be appropriate and For the Commission, by the Division of to the NASD. Under the terms of the
publishes its reasons for so finding, or Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Amended Plan, the member or other
(ii) as to which Amex consents, the authority.5 securities industry participant will be
Commission will: Nancy M. Morris, able to view the status and results of
(A) By order approve such proposed Secretary. fingerprints, including any relevant
rule change; or [FR Doc. E6–7105 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
criminal history information, through
(B) Institute proceedings to determine the CRD system.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
whether the proposed rule change The Commission has reviewed the
should be disapproved. procedures detailed in the Amended
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Plan and believes that the Amended
IV. Solicitation of Comments Plan is consistent with the public
COMMISSION
Interested persons are invited to interest and the protection of investors.
submit written data, views, and [Release No. 34–53751] Enabling members or other securities
arguments concerning the foregoing, industry participants to view the status
including whether the proposed rule Self-Regulatory Organizations; and results of fingerprints, including
change is consistent with the Act. National Association of Securities relevant criminal history information,
Comments may be submitted by any of Dealers, Inc.; Declaration of through the CRD system should improve
the following methods: Effectiveness of the Fingerprint Plan of the efficiency of members or other
the National Association of Securities securities industry participants in
Electronic Comments Dealers, Inc. identifying persons who may be subject
• Use the Commission’s Internet May 2, 2006. to statutory disqualification more
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ On May 1, 2006, the National rapidly. Thus, the Commission declares
rules/sro.shtml); or the Amended Plan to be effective.
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
• Send an e-mail to rule- The Commission notes that securities
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
comments@sec.gov. Please include File industry fingerprinting procedures are
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’
Number SR–Amex–2006–34 on the in a state of flux due to rapidly
or ‘‘SEC’’) an amended fingerprinting
subject line. advancing technology. In the event that
plan (‘‘Amended Plan’’) pursuant to
an industry-wide standard is adopted or
Paper Comments Rule 17f–2(c) 1 under the Securities
becomes prevalent and in the event that
• Send paper comments in triplicate Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).2 The
this Amended Plan substantially differs
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Amended Plan 3 supersedes and
therefrom, the Commission would
Securities and Exchange Commission, replaces the NASD’s current
expect the NASD to revise its
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE, fingerprinting plan.4 fingerprinting plan to incorporate the
Washington, DC 20549–1090. The NASD believes that the Amended
industry-wide standard.
All submissions should refer to File Plan will be an improvement over the
current NASD fingerprinting plan. It For the Commission, by the Division of
Number SR–Amex–2006–34. This file Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
number should be included on the permits the NASD to record in the
authority.5
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Central Registration Depository (‘‘CRD’’) Nancy M. Morris,
Commission process and review your the status of fingerprints submitted to
the Attorney General. Through the CRD Secretary.
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will system, NASD makes available to a Exhibit A—National Association of
post all comments on the Commission’s member or other securities industry Securities Dealers, Incorporated;
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ participant that has submitted Fingerprint Plan
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the fingerprints the status and results of
National Association of Securities
submission, all subsequent such fingerprints after submission to the
Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) submits this
amendments, all written statements Attorney General. In addition, the
Fingerprint Plan (‘‘Plan’’) pursuant to
with respect to the proposed rule NASD has made other minor clarifying
Rule 17f–2(c) under the Securities
change that are filed with the and typographical revisions.
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’).
Commission, and all written Under the NASD’s current
This Plan supersedes and replaces the
communications relating to the fingerprinting plan, members or other
NASD’s Fingerprint Plan approved by
proposed rule change between the securities industry participants submit
the Securities and Exchange
Commission and any person, other than fingerprints and identifying Commission (‘‘Commission’’) on June
those that may be withheld from the information, on paper or electronically,
22, 1976, and as amended thereafter.
public in accordance with the to the NASD, which then forwards the The purpose of this Plan is to
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be cards to the Federal Bureau of facilitate securities industry
available for inspection and copying in participants’ compliance with Section
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
the Commission’s Public Reference 1 17 CFR 240.17f–2(c).
17(f)(2) of the Exchange Act and Rule
Room. Copies of such filing also will be 2 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. 17f–2 thereunder, by providing a facility
available for inspection and copying at 3 Attached hereto as Exhibit A. for securities industry participants to
the principal office of Amex. All 4 The Commission declared the current

comments received will be posted fingerprint plan of the NASD effective in 1988. 5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(17)(iii).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:59 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1
27300 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 10, 2006 / Notices

have the fingerprints of their partners, disqualification under the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
directors, officers, and employees and to take action, as appropriate, with Securities Exchange Act of 1934
processed by the Attorney General of respect to such persons. (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 to
the United States or his designee NASD advises its members and reduce the fee charged to a Lead Market
(hereinafter ‘‘Attorney General’’) as member applicants of the availability of Maker (‘‘LMM’’) when it transfers
required by Section 17(f)(2) and Rule fingerprint services and any fees options issues to another LMM. The
17f–2, thereunder. NASD, pursuant to a charged by NASD in connection with proposed rule change was published for
Plan filed with and declared effective by those services and the processing of comment in the Federal Register on
the Commission, processes fingerprint fingerprints pursuant to this Plan. March 20, 2006.3 The Commission
records of securities industry NASD will file any such NASD member received no comments on the proposal.
participants as described herein fees with the Commission pursuant to This order approves the proposed rule
consistent with those provisions. Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act. change.
NASD accepts fingerprints and NASD maintains copies of fingerprint
identifying information from member processing results received from the II. Description of the Proposal
firms and other securities industry Attorney General with respect to In its filing, the Exchange proposed to
participants required to be fingerprinted fingerprints submitted by NASD reduce the fee charged to an LMM,
pursuant to Rule 17f–2. Securities pursuant to this Plan, in accordance when the LMM transfers an allocated
industry participants may submit with NASD’s Record Retention Plan options issue to another LMM. The
fingerprints and identifying information filed with the Commission. Any Exchange presently charges an LMM a
on paper or electronically, provided maintenance of fingerprint records by $1000 fee, per issue, in the event that
such submissions are consistent with NASD shall be for NASD’s own the LMM transfers the issue to another
protocols and requirements established administrative purposes, and NASD is LMM, in accordance with the
by the Attorney General. not undertaking to maintain fingerprint Exchange’s allocation procedures. The
NASD accepts a single set of records on behalf of NASD members $1000 per issue fee is subject to a cap
fingerprints and identifying information pursuant to Rule 17f–2(d)(2). NASD when multiple issues are included as
for an associated person in lieu of records in the Central Registration part of the same transfer. Under the new
separate fingerprint submissions by Depository (CRD) the status of proposal, the fee will be $100 per issue
affiliated NASD member firms with fingerprints submitted to the Attorney transferred. The new lower fee will not
which the individual is associated in General. Through the CRD system, be subject to a rate cap when multiple
satisfaction of the Section 17(f)(2) NASD makes available to a member that issues are transferred.
fingerprinting requirement, provided has submitted fingerprints the status The Exchange proposes to make this
that the NASD affiliate member firms and results of such fingerprints after fee effective retroactive to September 26,
are under common ownership or control submission to the Attorney General. 2005, which coincides with the date
as reported on Form BD, and that NASD shall not be liable for losses or that Archipelago Holdings Inc. acquired
affiliate information is provided with damages of any kind in connection with the Exchange (‘‘Merger’’). The Exchange
the initial application for registration. its fingerprinting services, as a result of will review all transfers that have
NASD transmits fingerprints and its failure to follow, or properly to occurred or may occur from September
identifying information, on paper or follow, the procedures described above, 26, 2005 through the effective date of
electronically, to the Attorney General or as a result of lost or delayed this proposal and will make any fee
for identification and processing, fingerprint cards, electronic fingerprint adjustments that are deemed warranted
consistent with protocols and records, or fingerprint reports, or as a pursuant to the proposed rate schedule
requirements established by the result of any action by NASD or NASD’s contained in this filing.
Attorney General. failure to take action in connection with
NASD receives processed results from III. Discussion
this Plan.
the Attorney General (on paper or After careful consideration, the
[FR Doc. E6–7100 Filed 5–9–06; 8:45 am]
electronically) and transmits those Commission finds that the proposed
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
results via paper or electronic means to rule change is consistent with the
authorized recipients (i.e., to a member requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act 4
or other securities industry participant and the rules and regulations
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
that submitted the fingerprints and to thereunder applicable to a national
COMMISSION
regulators for licensing, registration and securities exchange.5 In particular, the
other regulatory purposes), consistent [Release No. 34–53752; File No. SR–PCX– Commission finds that the proposed
with protocols and requirements 2006–14]
rule change is consistent with Section
established by the Attorney General. In 6(b)(4) of the Act,6 which requires,
cases where the Attorney General’s Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE Arca, Inc.); among other things, that an exchange’s
search on the fingerprints submitted rules provide for the equitable
fails to disclose prior arrest data, NASD Order Approving Proposed Rule
Change To Reduce the Fee Charged to allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
transmits that result to the securities other charges among its members and
industry participant that submitted the a Lead Market Maker When It Transfers
Options Issues to Another Lead Market other persons using its facilities. The
fingerprints. In cases where the
Attorney General’s search yields Maker
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Criminal History Record Information May 2, 2006. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
(CHRI), NASD transmits that 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53476

information to the securities industry I. Introduction (March 13, 2006), 71 FR 14046.


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
participant that submitted the On February 23, 2006, the Pacific
5 In approving the proposed rule change, the
fingerprints. With respect to members, Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE Arca, Inc.)
Commission has considered its impact on
NASD also reviews any CHRI returned (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
by the Attorney General to identify and Exchange Commission U.S.C. 78c(f).
persons who may be subject to statutory (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:59 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1

You might also like