You are on page 1of 918

SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TO

Instruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only. This template is applicable for complete elementary schools.

132763

School ID:

Name of School:

LANUZA CES

District:

PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT


THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year

Enrolment

Difference

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation

% of Increase

2011-12

356

2012-13

372

16

4.49

2013-14

404

32

8.60

2014-15

440

36

8.91

Ave. % of Increase:

0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below)


1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%)
2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% 9.99%)
3pts. - High: at least 10% inc
(10% and above)

7.34

7.34

THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30%


THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE

Year

Total En.
EoSY

Total En.
EoSY +
Dropout/s

Total Dropout
SYn

Rate

2011-12

356

356

0.00

2012-13

372

372

0.00

100.00

1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)

2013-14

404

404

0.00

100.00

2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%)

2014-15

440

440

% of Decrease

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result


Baseline: 7.06 (Con
0pt. - 24.99% and below

0.00
Ave. % of Decrease:

100.00

3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout

100.00

100
Baseline: 75%

THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE


Year

Gr. VI Graduates
SYn

Gr. I En. SYn-5

Rate

% of Increase

2011-12

65

63

103.17

37.57

0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)

2012-13

53

51

103.92

38.56

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)

2013-14

52

57

91.23

21.64

2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

66

57

115.79

54.39

3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

38.04

38.04
Baseline: 75%

THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATE


Year

Gr. VI En. SYn

Gr. I En. SYn-5

Rate

% of Increase

2011-12

65

63

103.17

37.57

0 pt - 4.99% and below

2012-13
2013-14

53
52

51
57

103.92
91.23

38.56
21.64

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)


2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

66

57

115.79

54.39

3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

38.04

38.04

Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added

9.00

THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)


% of Inc.
NAT MPS
Year
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14

82.86
78.67
86.65

divided by 3 equals
Baseline = 48%

72.63

1-Marginal: at least 7% inc.

63.90

2-Average: at least 8% Inc.

80.53

3-High: at least 10% Inc.

74.09

2014-15

54.36
Ave % of Increase

67.85

67.85

Sub
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles

Cases

Leadership
Curriculum and Learning
Accountability
Resource Management

5
7
5
5

TOTAL
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATING
Areas
A.
Performance Improvement
B.
SBM Assessment Score (DOD)
TOTAL

15
18
13
15

Weight

Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle


(Average Scores)

30%
30%
25%
15%

3.00
2.57
2.60
3.00

100%

x
x
x
x

Subtotal

Weight
60%
40%
100%

Computation
3.00
2.77
TOTAL RATING:

x
x

Descriptive Rating:

Prepared by:

Noted by:

Signature Over Printed Name


Position:

Name of School Head


Position: ____________________________

AD

CESS AND TOOL


District:

LANUZA

s./ Computation/ Result


2

6.99%)
ast 7% inc. (7% gh: at least 10% inc.

x
45%

0.9

0.9

Result
line: 7.06 (Constant)

times 0.25 equals

3
x
30%

0.75

30%

1.35
Subtotal:

Weight
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.15

1.35
3.00

Result
=
=
=
=

0.9
0.77
0.65
0.45

2.77
4.64
Results
0.6
0.4

1.8
1.11
2.91

ADVANCED

Pls. retype.

2.91

SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TO
Instruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only. This template is applicable for incomplete elementary schools.

132762

School ID:

Name of School:

HABAG PS

District:

PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT


THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year

Enrolment

Difference

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation

% of Increase

2011-12

52

2012-13

43

-9

-17.31

2013-14

44

2.33

2014-15

33

-11

-25.00

Ave. % of Increase:

0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below)


1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%)
2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% 9.99%)
3pts. - High: at least 10% inc
(10% and above)

-13.33

-13.33

THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30%


THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE

Year

Total En.
EoSY

Total En.
EoSY +
Dropout/s

Total Dropout
SYn

Rate

2011-12

52

52

0.00

2012-13

43

43

0.00

100.00

1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)

2013-14

44

44

0.00

100.00

2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%)

2014-15

33

35

19.06

3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout

% of Decrease

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result


Baseline: 7.06 (Con
0pt. - 24.99% and below

5.71
Ave. % of Decrease:

73.02

73.02
Baseline: 75%

THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE


Year

Gr. VI Graduates
SYn

Gr. I En. SYn-5

Rate

% of Increase

2011-12

25

0.00

-100.00

0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)

2012-13

17

0.00

-100.00

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)

2013-14

15

0.00

-100.00

2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

34

0.00

-100.00

3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

-100.00

100
Baseline: 75%

THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATE


Year

Gr. VI En. SYn

Gr. I En. SYn-5

Rate

% of Increase

2011-12

25

0.00

-100.00

0 pt - 4.99% and below

2012-13
2013-14

0
0

17
15

0.00
0.00

-100.00
-100.00

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)


2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

34

0.00

-100.00

3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

100.00

-100.00

Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added

8.00

THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)


% of Inc.
NAT MPS
Year
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14

58.46
78.66
84.37

divided by 3 equals
Baseline = 48%

21.79

0 pt. - 6.99% and below

63.88

1pt. - Marginal: at least 7% inc. (7% - 7.99%)

75.77

2pts. - Average: at least 8% Inc. (8% - 9.99%)

2.66667

81.41

2014-15

Ave % of Increase

69.60

3pts. - High: at least 10% Inc. (10% and above)

57.76

57.76

Sub
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles

Cases

Leadership
Curriculum and Learning
Accountability
Resource Management

5
7
5
5

TOTAL
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATING
Areas
A.
Performance Improvement
B.
SBM Assessment Score (DOD)
TOTAL

15
18
13
15

Weight

Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle


(Average Scores)

30%
30%
25%
15%

3.00
2.57
2.60
3.00

100%

x
x
x
x

Subtotal

Weight
60%
40%
100%

Computation
2.02
2.77
TOTAL RATING:

x
x

Descriptive Rating:

Prepared by:

Noted by:

Signature Over Printed Name


Position:

Name of School Head


Position: ____________________________

CESS AND TOOL


District:

LANUZA

s./ Computation/ Result


0

6.99%)
ast 7% inc. (7% gh: at least 10% inc.

x
45%

Result
line: 7.06 (Constant)

times 0.25 equals

3
x
30%

0.67

30%

1.35
Subtotal:

Weight
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.15

1.35
2.02

Result
=
=
=
=

0.9
0.77
0.65
0.45

2.77

0.6
0.4

4.64
Results
1.21
Pls. retype.
1.11
2.32
2.32

MATURING

SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TO
Instruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only.

304861

School ID:

Name of School:

BAROBO NHS

District:

PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT


THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year

Enrolment

Difference

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation

% of Increase

2011-12

1,243

2012-13

1,061

-182

-14.64

2013-14

1,068

0.66

2014-15

1,211

143

13.39

Ave. % of Increase:

0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below)


1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%)
2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% 9.99%)
3pts. - High: at least 10% inc
(10% and above)

-0.2

-0.20

THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30%


THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE

Year

Total En.
EoSY

Total En.
EoSY +
Dropout/s

Total Dropout
SYn

Rate

2011-12

1,243

1,284

41

3.19

2012-13

1,061

1,117

56

5.01

28.99

1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)

2013-14

1,068

1,112

44

3.96

43.95

2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%)

2014-15

1,211

1,243

32

63.54

3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout

% of Decrease

Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result


Baseline: 7.06 (Con
0pt. - 24.99% and below

2.57

45.49

45.49

% of Increase

Baseline: 75%

Ave. % of Decrease:

THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE


Year

Y4 Graduates SYn

YR1 En. SYn-3

Rate

2011-12

306

394

77.66

3.55

0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)

2012-13

210

282

74.47

-0.71

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)

2013-14

205

304

67.43

-10.09

2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

231

393

58.78

-21.63

3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

-7.22

-7.22
Baseline: 75%

THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATE


Year

Y4 En. SYn

YR1 En. SYn-3

Rate

% of Increase

2011-12

326

394

82.74

10.32

0 pt - 4.99% and below

2012-13
2013-14

211
205

282
304

74.82
67.43

-0.24
-10.09

1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)


2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)

2014-15

235

393

59.80

-20.27

3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)

Ave % of Increase:

-5.07

-5.07

Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added

1.00

divided by 3 equals

THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)


% of Inc.
NAT MPS
Year
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14

58.46
77.98
73.98

Baseline = 48%

21.79

0 pt. - 6.99% and below

62.47

1pt. - Marginal: at least 7% inc. (7% - 7.99%)

54.13

2pts. - Average: at least 8% Inc. (8% - 9.99%)

0.33333

66.44

2014-15

Ave % of Increase

38.42

3pts. - High: at least 10% Inc. (10% and above)

44.20

44.20

Sub
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles
Leadership
Curriculum and Learning
Accountability
Resource Management

Cases

Score

Weight

Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle


(Average Scores)

5
7
5
5

15
18
13
15

30%
30%
25%
15%

3.00
2.57
2.60
3.00

TOTAL
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATING
Areas
A.
Performance Improvement
B.
SBM Assessment Score (DOD)
TOTAL

100%

x
x
x
x

Subtotal

Weight
60%
40%
100%

Computation
1.43
2.77
TOTAL RATING:

x
x

Descriptive Rating:

Prepared by:

Noted by:

Signature Over Printed Name


Position:

Name of School Head


Position: ____________________________

CESS AND TOOL


District:

BAROBO

s./ Computation/ Result


0

6.99%)
ast 7% inc. (7% gh: at least 10% inc.

x
45%

Result
line: 7.06 (Constant)

times 0.25 equals

3
x
30%

0.08

30%

1.35
Subtotal:

Weight
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.15

1.35
1.43

Result
=
=
=
=

0.9
0.77
0.65
0.45

2.77

0.6
0.4

4.64
Results
0.86
Pls. retype.
1.11
1.97
1.97

MATURING

You might also like