You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices 3819

FPB.DocketClerk@usda.gov. Comments present; (2) a lot of berries which has 23 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
should make reference to the dates and percent shattered berries 13 percent Robert M. Eadie, Branch Chief, Policy
page number of this issue of the Federal would be reported as a defect which and Program Development Branch,
Register and will be made available for would cause the lot to fail meet the Child Nutrition Division, Food and
public inspection in the above office requirements of the U.S. No. Table 1 Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
during regular business hours. The grade by 1 percent. The petitioners Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive,
United States Standards for Grades of stated that they feel change, specific to Room 640, Alexandria, Virginia 22302,
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera consumer containers, is warranted as (703) 305–2590.
Type) are available either through the the majority of table grapes are now SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
address cited above or by accessing the being sold in consumer containers program is listed in the Catalog of
AMS, Fresh Products Branch Web site which allows shattered berries to be Federal Domestic Assistance under No.
at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/standards/ fully utilized/sold. This does not hold 10.559 and is subject to the provisions
stanfrfv.htm. true for shattered berries in bulk of Executive Order 12372 which
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: containers, as these berries remain loose requires intergovernmental consultation
Cheri L. Emery, at the above address or in the container, therefore, limiting the with State and local officials (7 CFR part
call (202) 720–2185, E-mail ability to fully utilize/sell the shattered 3015, subpart V, and final rule related
Cheri.Emery@usda.gov. berries. notice published at 48 FR 29114, June
Prior to undertaking detailed work to 24, 1983).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
develop a proposed revision to the In accordance with the Paperwork
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as standards, AMS is soliciting comments
on the petition submitted to revise the 3518), no new recordkeeping or
amended, directs and authorizes the reporting requirements have been
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘To develop United States Standards for Grades of
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera included that are subject to approval
and improve standards of quality, from the Office of Management and
condition, quantity, grade and Type).
This notice provides for a 60-day Budget.
packaging and recommend and This notice is not a rule as defined by
demonstrate such standards in order to comment period for interested parties to
comment on changes to the standards. the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
encourage uniformity and consistency 601–612) and thus is exempt from the
in commercial practices.’’ AMS is Should AMS conclude that revisions are
needed, the Agency will develop a provisions of that Act. Additionally, this
committed to carrying out this authority notice has been determined to be
in a manner that facilitates the proposed revised standard that will be
published in the Federal Register with exempt from review by the Office of
marketing of agricultural commodities Management and Budget under
and makes copies of official standards a request for comments.
Executive Order 12866.
available upon request. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Definitions
Background Dated: January 18, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day, The terms used in this Notice shall
AMS received petitions from the have the meaning ascribed to them in
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
California Grape and Tree Fruit League the regulations governing the Summer
Service.
and Western Growers Association, Food Service Program for Children (7
[FR Doc. E6–783 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
requesting a revision to the United CFR part 225).
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
States Standards for Grades of Table
Grapes (European or Vinifera Type). Background
These standards were last revised in In accordance with Section 13 of the
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1999. The petitioners represent more National School Lunch Act (NSLA) (42
than 85 percent of the European or Food and Nutrition Service U.S.C. 1761) and the regulations
Vinifera type table grape production in governing the SFSP (7 CFR part 225),
the United States. Summer Food Service Program for notice is hereby given of adjustments in
The petitioners are requesting that Children Program Reimbursement for Program payments for meals served to
AMS revise the standards to provide a 2006 children participating in the SFSP in
10 percent allowance for shattered 2006. Adjustments are based on changes
berries in consumer containers for en AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, in the food away from home series of
route or at destination. Shattered means USDA. the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All
that the berry is detached from the ACTION: Notice. Urban Consumers for the period
bunch. The standards currently provide November 2004 through November
a 12 percent total tolerance for bunches SUMMARY: This notice informs the public 2005.
and berries failing to meet the of the annual adjustments to the Section 104(a) of the William F.
requirements of grade for en route or at reimbursement rates for meals served in Goodling Child Nutrition
destination. Revising the standards to the Summer Food Service Program for Reauthorization Act of 1998 (Public Law
include a separate 10 percent allowance Children (SFSP). These adjustments 105–336) amended Section 12(f) of the
would mean that shattered berries reflect changes in the Consumer Price NSLA (42 U.S.C. 1760(f)) to allow
would not be scored as a defect against Index and are required by the statute adjustments to SFSP reimbursement
the 12 percent total tolerance until the governing the Program. In addition, rates to reflect the higher cost of
amount of shattered berries exceeds the further adjustments are made to these providing meals in the SFSP in Alaska
rates to reflect the higher costs of
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1

10 percent allowance. For example: (1) and Hawaii. Therefore, this notice
A lot of berries which has 22 percent providing meals in the States of Alaska contains adjusted rates for Alaska and
shattered berries 12 percent would be and Hawaii, as authorized by the Hawaii. This change was made in an
reported as a defect, this lot would meet William F. Goodling Child Nutrition effort to be consistent with other Child
the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 Table Reauthorization Act of 1998. Nutrition Programs, such as the
grade provided no other defects were DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2006. National School Lunch Program and the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1
3820 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices

School Breakfast Program, which higher reimbursement rates for The 2006 reimbursement rates, in
already had the authority to provide programs in Alaska and Hawaii. dollars, for all States excluding Alaska
and Hawaii:

MAXIMUM PER MEAL REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR ALL STATES (NOT AK OR HI)
Administrative costs
Operating Rural or Other
costs self-prepa- types of
ration sites sites

Breakfast ........................................................................................................................................................ $1.47 $.1450 $.1150


Lunch or Supper ............................................................................................................................................ 2.56 .2675 .2225
Supplement .................................................................................................................................................... .59 .0725 .0575

The 2006 reimbursement rates, in


dollars, for Alaska:

MAXIMUM PER MEAL REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR ALASKA ONLY


Administrative costs
Operating Rural or Other
costs self-prepa- types of
ration sites sites

Breakfast ........................................................................................................................................................ $2.38 $.2350 $.1875


Lunch or Supper ............................................................................................................................................ 4.15 .4350 .3600
Supplement .................................................................................................................................................... .97 .1175 .0925

The 2006 reimbursement rates, in


dollars, for Hawaii:

MAXIMUM PER MEAL REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR HAWAII ONLY


Administrative costs
Operating Rural or Other
costs self-prepa- types of
ration sites sites

Breakfast ........................................................................................................................................................ $1.72 $.1700 $.1350


Lunch or Supper ............................................................................................................................................ 3.00 .3125 .2600
Supplement .................................................................................................................................................... .70 .0850 .0675

The total amount of payments to State required by Section 11(a)(3)(B) of the of the Secure Rural Schools and
agencies for disbursement to Program NSLA (42 U.S.C. 1759 (a)(3)(B)). Community Self Determination Act of
sponsors will be based upon these Authority: Secs. 9, 13 and 14, National 2000 (Public Law 106–393
Program reimbursement rates and the School Lunch Act, as amended (42 U.S.C.
number of meals of each type served. 1758, 1761, and 1762a). SUMMARY: This notice is published in
The above reimbursement rates, for both Dated: January 17, 2006. accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the
operating and administrative Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Roberto Salazar,
reimbursement rates, represent a 3.2 Meeting notice is hereby given for the
Administrator.
percent increase during 2005 (from southwest Mississippi Resource
189.6 in November 2004 to 195.6 in [FR Doc. E6–793 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am] Advisory Committee pursuant to
November 2005) in the food away from BILLING CODE 3410–30–P Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools
home series of the Consumer Price and Community Self Determination Act
Index for All Urban Consumers, of 2000, Public Law 106–393. Topics to
published by the Bureau of Labor DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE be discussed include: General
Statistics of the Department of Labor. Forest Service information, possible Title II projects,
The Department would like to point out and next meeting dates and agendas.
that the SFSP administrative Southwest Mississippi Resource DATES: The meeting will be held on
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1

reimbursement rates continue to be Advisory Committee February 28, 2006, from 6 p.m. and end
adjusted up or down to the nearest
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. at approximately 9 p.m.
quarter-cent, as has previously been the
case. Additionally, operating ACTION:Meeting notice for the ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
reimbursement rates have been rounded Southwest Mississippi Resource the Franklin County Public Library, 381
down to the nearest whole cent, as Advisory Committee under Section 205 First Street, Meadville, Mississippi.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1

You might also like