Professional Documents
Culture Documents
210217, 2000
The aim of this study was to verify whether twin pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia were associated with a
higher rate of inter-twin weight discordance or an increased
prevalence of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates than
in normotensive twin pregnancies. A 17 year retrospective
study was undertaken by examining 76 twin pregnancies
complicated by pre-eclampsia and comparing them with
400 normotensive twin pregnancies. The case notes were
reviewed in reference to birth weight differences, birth
order, pregnancy outcome and inter-twin birth weight
discordance. Statistical analyses were performed with t-test,
contingency tables, regression curves, rank sum test and
non-parametric survival plots. Power analysis was also
carried out. Pre-eclamptic twin pregnancies were delivered
at similar weeks of gestation to normotensive. They resulted
in a smaller size for the second twin the earlier the delivery
week, while in normotensive twin pregnancies no significant
difference occurred at any week. Twin pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia showed higher rates of SGA neonates
among second twins than those with normal pressure. The
>25% discordance was associated with lower gestational
age at delivery in each group [mean (range) 33 weeks (27
38) versus 37 (2941), P < 0.005 pre-eclampsia and 35
weeks (2541) versus 38 (2542), P < 0.001 normotensive].
In pre-eclampsia the concomitant occurrence of SGA
second twin and the discordance >25% was associated with
shorter gestation while the presence of SGA second twin
alone was not.
Key words: birth weight discordance/growth restriction/preeclampsia/twin pregnancy
Introduction
It is well known that singleton pregnancies complicated by
pre-eclampsia are characterized more frequently by low birth
weight and small for gestational age (SGA) neonates than
normotensive pregnancies (Ananth et al., 1995). This increased
prevalence of low birth weight has also been reported in twin
pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia (McMullan et al.,
1984; Long and Oats, 1987), although some authors did not
find any difference in the rate of low birth weight compared
210
when the distribution of the data was not normal and the 2 or
Fishers exact test when appropriate for comparison of frequencies.
P values 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered significant. A power
analysis was performed for statistical inference. The value reported
in the tables represents the power of the statistical test used to
detect the observed difference between two sample mean values or
frequencies. This value is derived from assessing 0.05 and a
sample size of 76 when the t-test is used (Glanz, 1987) or a 5.3 ratio
(400/76) when the 2 is applied (Marascuilo and McSweeney, 1977).
Power determination in regression analysis was obtained according
to Cohen (Cohen, 1977) by using the Fisher z transformation for the
critical value of r and for sample r. Survival statistics and plots were
obtained by using the KaplanMeier non-parametric method and the
P value was obtained through the log rank (MantelCox). Multiple
comparisons with Bonferroni correction were used to isolate differences between groups. All computations were performed on an Apple
Macintosh Performa 6400/200 with appropriate software (Microsoft
Excel, Abacus StatView).
Results
Table I shows some main clinical characteristics and pregnancy
outcomes in the two groups. No significant differences regarding height, weight before pregnancy or maternal age were
observed. The rate of nulliparas was 19% higher in preeclamptic twin pregnancies as compared to normotensive.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were higher in preeclamptic twin pregnancies, as expected. Delivery week rate
of premature delivery (under 37 weeks) and rate of low
birth weight neonates were similar in both groups. The
Caesarean section rate was higher in pre-eclamptic pregnancies, as expected. Twin pre-eclamptic women had a higher
prevalence of SGA neonates. Stillbirth prevalence showed no
significant difference between pre-eclamptic and normotensive
twin pregnancies. In pre-eclamptic twin pregnancies, stillbirth
involved both twins in two cases, twin A in one case and twin
B in two cases. In normotensive twin pregnancies stillbirth
occurred in both twins in two cases, twin A in five cases and
twin B in 11 cases. The involvement rate of twin B was double
that of twin A in each group.
Table II shows some detailed birth weight features in the
two groups. No significant differences were observed between
the two groups of pregnancies in regard to birth weight
according to delivery order. However, a higher proportion of
SGA neonates in pre-eclamptic pregnancies involved the
second twin. This pattern remained significant even after
exclusion of stillbirths (P 0.03). There was also a significantly higher inter-twin absolute (1.3 times), percentage (1.4
times) and signed percentage weight discordance (3.7 times)
in the pre-eclamptic group than in the normotensive. These
findings were observed despite similarities in total birth weight
and in the monochorionic placental type distribution between
the two groups.
Figure 1 shows that in pre-eclamptic twin pregnancies there
was a significant negative correlation between inter-twin signed
percentage weight discordance and the week of delivery. This
correlation was even more significant after exclusion of cases
of intrauterine death (r 0.33, P 0.005, power
0.80). On the other hand, the same regression line drawn in
normotensive twin pregnancies was not significantly different
211
S.Ferrazzani et al.
Table I. Main maternal clinical features and pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancies
Height (cm)
Weight before pregnancy (kg)
Age (years)
Nulliparas n (%)
Highest SBP (mmHg)b
Highest DBP (mmHg)b
Week of delivery
median (range)
Delivery 37 weeks n (%)
Caesarean section n (%)
Birth weight 2500 g n of
neonates (%)
Birth weight 10th percentile n
of neonates (%)c
Birth weight 10th percentile n
of neonates (%)d
Stillbirth n of neonates (%)
Pre-eclamptic
(n 76)
Normotensive
(n 400)
Powera
161.3 6.9
59.6 9.1
30.0 5.1
40 (66.7)
148.4 15.9
94.4 12.4
37 (2741)
NS
NS
NS
0.001
0.001
0.001
NS
162.1 6.5
58.9 9.0
29.8 4.4
167 (47.6)
118.1 11.7
72.6 9.5
37 (2542)
0.12
0.08
0.06
0.85
1.00
1.00
47 (61.8)
57 (75.0)
94 (61.8)
NS
0.001
NS
201 (50.3)
202 (50.5)
433 (54.2)
0.40
0.98
0.37
61 (40.2)
0.05
251 (31.4)
0.52
25 (16.7)
0.05
78 (10.6)
0.52
7 (4.6)
NS
20 (2.5)
0.26
Where not otherwise specified, values are expressed as mean SD; NS not significant; SBP systolic
blood pressure; DBP diasystolic blood pressure.
aSee text for details.
bValues without anti-hypertensive therapy and before delivery.
cAccording to singleton growth curve.
dAccording to twin growth curve (one pre-eclamptic and 19 normotensive pregnancies were excluded
because out of the limits of the reference curve, 2841 weeks).
Pre-eclamptic
(n 76)
Normotensive
(n 400)
Powera
2322 645
24 (31.6)
9 (12.0)
2133 739
37 (48.7)
16 (21.3)
4454 1303
396 323
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.03
0.05
NS
0.01
2348 636
117 (29.3)
31 (8.1)
2290 662
134 (33.5)
47 (12.2)
4638 1231
306 278
0.06
0.03
0.17
0.30
0.40
0.49
0.15
0.48
17.9 16.3
8.9 22.6
0.01
0.01
13.1 12.6
2.4 18.0
0.63
0.55
21 (27.6)
NS
83 (21.0)
0.22
Where not otherwise specified, values are expressed as mean SD; NS not significant.
aSee text for details.
bAccording to singleton growth curve.
cAccording to twin growth curve (one pre-eclamptic and 19 normotensive pregnancies were excluded
because they were out of the limits of the reference curve, 2841 weeks).
from the equality line between twin pairs, even after excluding
intrauterine deaths (r 0.0004, P 0.99, power 0.97).
Figure 2 reports the cumulative survival plots for the
gestational duration related to four degrees of percentage
weight discordance (25%, 2515%, 1510% and 10%).
As shown, in both groups of twin pregnancies, the discordance
25% was associated with shorter gestational duration. This
association was particularly evident in pre-eclamptic twin
pregnancies where the survival function of the discordance
25% was significantly different from all the other functions.
Conversely, in normotensive twin pregnancies the survival
function of the discordance 25% was only different from
discordance 10%. The median (range) weeks of gestation at
212
Figure 1. Regression lines of signed percent birthweight discordance (SPWD) drawn against duration of gestation.
Figure 2. Survival analysis. Cumulative plot for duration of gestation in relation to four arbitrary degrees of percent weight discordance
(PWD). Only significant results are reported.
Table III. Distribution of the four degrees of discordance between preeclamptic and normotensive women
Degrees of
discordance
Pre-eclamptic
Normotensive
25%
2515%
1510%
10%
Total
15
17
14
30
76
47
79
81
193
400
(19.7)
(22.4)
(18.4)
(39.5)
(100.0)
(11.8)
(19.7)
(20.3)
(48.2)
(100.0)
S.Ferrazzani et al.
Figure 3. Percent distribution of various combinations of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates according to the degree of inter-twin
percentage weight discordance in the two groups, according to singleton and twin growth curves. Twin A is defined as first born and twin B
as second born.
Figure 4. The histograms describe twin B/twin A small for gestational age (SGA) rate ratio as a relative measure of the involvement of
twin B over twin A. Only significant results are reported.
Figure 5. Survival analysis. Cumulative plots for duration of gestation in presence of various combinations of small for gestational age
(SGA) twin pairs according to singleton and twin growth curves. Only significant results are reported.
S.Ferrazzani et al.
Figure 6. Survival analysis. Cumulative plot for duration of gestation related to pregnancies with the concomitance of both small for
gestational age (SGA) twin B and discordance (according to the various degrees) according to singleton and twin growth curves. Only
significant results are reported.
References
ACOG (1986) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Technical
Bulletin, Washington, DC, No. 91.
Ananth, C.V., Peedicayil, A. and Savitz, D.A. (1995) Effect of hypertensive
diseases in pregnancy on birthweight, gestational duration, and small-forgestational-age births. Epidemiology, 6, 391395.
Blickstein, I. and Lancet, M. (1988) The growth discordant twin. Obstet.
Gynecol. Surv., 43, 509515.
Blickstein, I., Shoham-Schwartz, Z., Lancet, M. et al. (1987) Characterization
of the growth-discordant twin. Obstet. Gynecol., 70, 1115.
Blickstein, I., Shoham-Schwartz, Z. and Lancet, M. (1988) Growth discordancy
in appropriate for gestational age, term twins. Obstet. Gynecol., 72, 582584.
Bronsteen, R., Govert, G. and Bottoms, S. (1989) Classification of twins and
neonatal morbidity. Obstet. Gynecol., 74, 98101.
Campbell, D.M. (1995) Pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy (abst). Hypertens.
Pregn., 14, 94.
Cohen, S.B., Dulitzky, M., Lipitz, S. et al. (1997) New birth weight nomograms
for twin gestation on the basis of accurate gestational age. Am. J. Obstet.
Gynecol., 177, 11011104.
Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences.
Academic Press, New York.
Daniel, Y., Kupferminc, M.J., Baram, A. et al. (1998) Plasma soluble
endothelial selectin is elevated in women with pre-eclampsia. Hum. Reprod.,
13, 35373541.
Essel, J.K. and Opai-Tetteh, E.T. (1994) Twin birth-weight discordancy in
Transkei. S. Afr. Med. J., 84, 6971.
Ferrazzani, S., Caruso, A., De Carolis, S. et al. (1990) Proteinuria and outcome
of 444 pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,
162, 366371.
Friedman, E.A., Sachtleben, M.R. and Friedman, L.M. (1977) Relative birth
weights of twins. Obstet. Gynecol., 49, 717720.
217