Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When it comes to performance art, the odds are that whatever the work it will likely be controversial in
some shape or form. From the anarchic dadaist movement that came out of Zurichs Cabaret Voltaire
in 1916 and Joseph Beuys cradling a dead hare to the disturbing performances of Hermann Nitschs
blood-drinking and ritualistic incorporation of human entrails, performance arts shock value often far
surpasses alternative media. That being said, it is also often the medium most worthy of critique and
ridicule.
But performance art isnt all about getting naked and proclaiming transcedent statements about the
universe. At its best, performance art can be dangerous and relevant, tearing away the veneer of
civilisation. In Cut Piece, Yoko Ono allowed visitors to cut her clothes with scissors, and in doing so
took an aim at the violent treatment of women in society. Chris Burden offered genuine personal risk
as artistic expression in his 1971 piece Shoot, where he was shot in the arm with a rifle from close
range.
It would be unthinkable not to mention Marina Abramovi; the doyenne of performance art, she has
one of the most robust oeuvres. In the past, Abramovi allowed viewers to pierce her skin with thorns
and point loaded guns at her head, look into her eyes for 736 hours, and watch her almost die in a
flaming five-point star. To celebrate her latest exhibition at Londons Serpentine, 512 Hours, in which
visitors can view Abramovi doing nothing for eight hours a day, six days a week, we take a look at
ten of the most controversial performance artworks in recent times.
SEBASTIAN HORSLEY CRUCIFIXION (2000)
When British painter Sebastian Horsley wanted to paint the crucifixion, he decided it was necessary
to be actually crucified in order to understand the biblical event better. He travelled to the Philippines
and paid 2,000 for the experience of having five-inch nails hammered through his hands, while being
hoisted onto a cross. As well as the indescribable pain and losing consciousness, Horsley explained
he felt hallucinogenic endorphins during the half hour process, despite his foot support breaking
beneath at one point.
MAO SUGIYAMA TESTICLE BANQUET (2012)
As the famous saying goes, you cant have your testicles and eat them. Unfortunately, Japanese man
Mao Sugiyama wasnt present for that class. The self-described "asexual" decided to have his
genitals fried up for a banquet to raise awareness about "sexual minorities, x-gender, asexual
people. Five people paid around 100,000 yen (600) in total, to consume the severed penis,
testicles, and scrotal skin alongside a garnish of button mushrooms and Italian parsley. Sugiyama
was later threatened by police with charges of indecent exposure.
Mao Sugiyama
WAFAA BILAL THE 3RD I (2010-11)
Visual artist and New York University professor Wafaa Bilal spent many years living a nomadic
existence in the Middle East, and became sick of it. His piece, The 3rd I, saw Bilal have a titanium
plate implanted into the back of his head, while a camera was attached capturing an image every
minute for 24 hours a day, automatically posting online. According to Bilal, it would raise "important
social, aesthetic, political, technological and artistic questions," but due to privacy issues, he was
forced to cover the camera while on campus.
Habacuc