Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEETING WITH STATE REPRESENTATIVE DAN ITSE 2/13/2020
2/27/10
FILE
TH E M EET IN G
The three delegates of New Hampshire set up and conducted this meeting with Dan Itse, State
Representative NH, between 11 am and 3 pm in Dan’s home in Fremont, NH. We were grateful for
the time he allocated, and the meeting was very informative. We saw that Dan was eager to spend as
much time with us as we wanted, and was totally forthcoming and cooperative.
Our purpose was to run the AGENDA that is attached to this memorandum. Basically, the
purpose was initially simply to convey the AoF, discuss the “Summary”, and convey a copy of
William’s Delegates Journals as it stands to date to give Dan an insight into what transpired at
CC2009.
Within a short period, the meeting became one of discussion of strategies for bringing the State
into alliance with “State Sovereignty” the Constitution. We discussed many liberty-related issues, and
we had to constantly come back to the AGENDA and push along or we never would have ended
this meeting.
The “meat” of the discussion centered upon the SUMMARY, and in particular the column called
“REMEDIAL IINSTRUCTIONS: STATE” which proved to be a vehicle for a rather detailed
summary of how New Hampshire “stands” on the articles, one by one. We all took notes, William in
particular led the discussion about this “Inventory”, and his report of the status of each Article in
New Hampshire is attached.
We also discussed at some length the proper way to introduce the AoF to the Legislature. In the
end we concluded that a good way to do this is “by echelon”.
2. For the balance of the members of the Government, Senate and House, the Articles will be
forwarded by email to each one with a transmittal letter.
This memorandum is mainly for the benefit of other delegates in other states. The issues and
situations for each State will be unique, so we will not delve into the details of our discussion,
However, the short list of topics we addressed (below) will give you sense for the “scope” of this
meeting. Within each topic we discussed the local personalities involved, the barriers faced, and the
directions being taken. The discussion was, to say the very least, “highly” instructive.
Christian Revival
John Adams
2
Article 36 New Hampshire Code (Welfare)
17th Amendment
Right to Travel
Licenses revenues
Police Powers
Money
There were more things discussed, and under each of the topic above we got into the
personalities, amounts, etc. But we think this list will give you and idea.
The meeting ended around 3 pm and there was no break in the meeting to eat.
1. Setting up a meeting with a “liberty-friendly” representative is a great way to get into the
fray. It gave us many good facts, a status of the situation, and ideas for proceeding forward
in communicating the AoF to our Legislature.
3
2. The meeting also suggested that effort spent on the Federal Levels, those who have already
refused so many times to listen, are largely a waste, and probably not worth the bother. We
are discussing simply sending them a mailing, return receipt requested. However, there is
some discussion about filming an attempt at hand delivery, mainly for the purpose of
developing “evidence” that people can see for themselves of how resistant they are to
“getting it”, NOT THAT THE American people need much more evidence of that after the
last series of “Town Meetings”!
As a result of our meeting we are proceeding to make plans for April 19th, but will wait to refine
anything until AFTER the webinars later this month to discuss it with the delegate groups and Bob
Schulz. Most likely the drill will be hand delivery to the three mentioned above in the first part of
this memo, email delivery into the very large “body” of the legislature, and snail mail with receipt
delivery to the Federals.
4
(!-*7.4&.1/1.5)$)-'7.413),%3.42
%!1%(%1%,!)-+73.#.,,4-)#!3%2.,%,!3%1)!+2$%5%+./%$!3
%(!5%!&%604%23).-21%'!1$)-'3(%/1./%16!73.#.,,4-)#!3%
3(%2%3.3(%.42%%6.4+$+)*%7.415)%62.-3(%,!33%1
-$)&6%#!-6%6.4+$"%(!//73.!-26%1!-7.&7.4104%23).-2
1%'!1$)-' .1&)-$3(%!-26%123.7.4104%23).-2)&6%$.
-.3(!5%3(%,),,%$)!3%+7
8
)2#422!".433(%9(%(1%%23%/+!-:#411%-3+7"%)-'/43
&.16!1$3.3(%%+%'!3%2.&!++3(%3!3%2&.1!-/1)+3(%5%-3
#./7!33!#(%$
)2#422.5%13(%9 :.&3(%913)#+%2:3(!36%1%/!22%$
!3 !33!#(%$&/!13)#4+!1),/.13!-#%)23(%#.+4,-
-!,%$9%,%$)!+-2314#3).-2
3!3%:
5
6
%&
%&
!$
"#
Petitions for Redress – Direct redress The legislature used to hear petitions directly from
the people. In fact, it was most of their work. This
practice has fallen out of style but we are working
on bringing it back. Legislation is not needed, just
more people in the state house which we'll have
next year.
Petitions for Redress – Recall petitions He is interested in learning more about the
constitutionality of recall petitions and if feasible,
will introduce legislation.
Firearms - HB1285–
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/
7
relative to the exemption of certain firearms, HB1285.html
firearms accessories, and ammunition made in New
Hampshire from federal law and regulation. Status – Out of committee, Inexpedient to
Legislate, unlikely to pass.
Firearms - HB1433 –
Our people gutted this as much as they could. It establishing an information and analysis
seemed unstoppable with the resources available. center within the department of safety.
We will be working with Operation Defuse.
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/
HB0587.html
8
or counsel for the defendant to explain this Minority Report:Ought to Pass
right of jury nullification to the jury.
Unlikely to pass.
War Powers Says the State may write legislation directing how
it's U.S. Senators vote. This could be useful here as
well as other places.