Straight Path Communications Inc.

(STRP)
How to commit fraud against the FCC and get away with it (until now)

Executive Summary

There is overwhelming evidence that the vast majority of Straight Path Communications'
("Straight Path") 39 GHz spectrum licenses' Required Notification of Construction/Coverage
Applications were obtained under fraudulent misrepresentation, because the systems were
never built on the sites as specified in the filings.

Michael Rapaport, as a representative of IDT Spectrum and Spectrum Holdings Technologies

("IDT"), the transferors of Straight Path's 39 GHz licenses, has likely committed over 150+
counts of fraud against the US government and made a mockery of the FCC's trust-based
license renewal process. Instead of spending vast amounts of time, money, and resources to
actually building up the required 39 GHz wireless sites in the 173 Basic Economic Areas (BEA)
across the country, IDT/Rapaport gamed the system by filing construction/coverage substantial
service Required Notifications that would pass FCC renewal process with nothing but a word
processor.

Almost all of the 39 GHz systems that are claimed to be "constructed" by IDT to provide
Substantial Service as required for their 39 GHz license renewals in 2011-2012, cannot possibly
been able to meet their performance specifications, as their purported systems defy the laws
of physics, geometry, economics, and common sense. Readers, investors, and the FCC can
easily verify for themselves that IDTs systems were never built or operating at the time of
renewal.

Even if Straight Path's licenses have any value at all (which they don't), because they were
renewed under false statements of coverage/construction, the licenses are at high risk of being
terminated and stripped from Straight Path's ownership. Thus, the fair value of Straight Path
stock without ownership of the 39 GHz licenses and being banned from future FCC spectrum
participation is $1.00-2.00 per share, or approximately liquidation value.

We urge the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and regulatory authorities to

immediately open an investigation into the license renewal process of Straight Path's 39 GHz
licenses and ask Straight Path for proof that the Required Constructions were met for all of the
systems claimed to be built in the 173 Basic Economic Areas. Companies should not be allowed
to lie to the US Government and get away with it.

Due to the danger of retaliation from the company and individuals involved, this report was written
under a pseudonym, Sinclair Upton Research. People who commit fraud for millions of dollars are willing
to do anything to keep their illegitimate gains. The author of this report can be contacted at
s.upton@hushmail.com.

Disclaimer As of publication date, the author of this report has short positions in and owns
options of the company covered herein and stands to realize gains in the event that the price
of the stock declines. Following publication, the author may transact in the securities of the
company, and may be long, short, or neutral at any time hereafter regardless of our initial
recommendation. The author of this report has obtained all information contained herein
from sources they believe to be accurate and reliable. The author of this report makes no
representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any
such information or with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. All expressions of
opinion are subject to change without notice, and the author does not undertake to update
or supplement this report or any of the information contained herein. This is not an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor shall any security be offered or sold to
any person, in any jurisdiction in which such offer would be unlawful under the securities
laws of such jurisdiction.

Background
In early 2011, IDT Spectrum, LLC (IDT) a subsidiary of IDT Corporation, had a big problem and it
needed a solution, and it needed it fast. At that time, IDT owned 931 licenses in the 39 GHz spectrum
and those licenses would expire and be terminated by June 1, 2012, unless IDT could show that it met
the substantial service requirements of Section 101.17(a). If IDT did not meet those requirements, they
would not be able to keep those licenses until the next expiration date of October 18, 2020, which
would cost them their investment in those licenses.
Under FCC renewal requirements for each license, IDT had to show that they constructed systems to
either 1) broadcast 39 GHz signals with 4 point-to-point links per 1 million population within each
county-sized Basic Economic Area (BEA) service areas or 2) under the point-to-multipoint safe harbor
established for LMDS provide coverage to 20 percent of the population of the license's BEA service area.
For each BEA, there are 14 licenses consisting of 100 MHz Channels between 38.6-40.0 GHz. However,
leasing the sites for the systems, building the hardware, and operating the radio and antennas in all 173
BEAs across all 50 states would cost a lot of money, at least $10-12 million dollars by another (now
bankrupt) spectrum holder companys estimates.
Enter Michael Rapaport.
Rapaport, former president of IDT Spectrum, LLC, came up with a working, but illegal solution. First, IDT
would build 1 actual, real system (we believe this is the system covering San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose
in BEA163 filed on 7/28/10), get it renewed by the FCC, and use that paperwork as a template to make
fillings in all the other 172 BEAs. This is acceptable, if IDT actually built the systems.
But, IDT did not actually build most, if not all of the other 172 systems as required, but still filed the
Required Notification of Construction/Coverages falsely asserting that they did build them. The FCC,
lacking the manpower to inspect each and every application, and having a trust-based license renewal
process, approved those licenses for renewal, and IDT got almost all of their licenses renewed crosscountry. This was quite unusual, because the other large holders of 39 GHz licenses (FiberTower,
Airband), attempted to renew but still failed to meet the substantial service requirements and let their
licenses expire.
In mid-2012, IDT and Rapaport had another similar problem. Rapaport, through his company Spectrum
Holdings Technologies, LLC (Spectrum Holdings), acquired 200 licenses in 39 GHz from Level 3 and
PTPMS Communications in 122 BEAs that were about to expire because the substantial service
requirements were due on June 1, 2012. Spectrum Holdings was assigned ownership of these licenses
on May 31, 2012. Amazingly, after just 12 days after getting the licenses, by June 12, 2012, Spectrum
Holdings filed their Notifications of Construction/Coverage for every license. How did Spectrum Holdings
build up systems in every state in the country in just 12 days? The answer is, they didnt. Spectrum
Holdings simply used the same template as IDT, used find/replace in a word processor to change IDT to
Spectrum Holdings, left the rest of the specifications and locations of the site exactly the same, and got
these new licenses approved. Problem solved. In 2013, Spectrum Holdings assigned their licenses to
Straight Path Communications, who also now owns the former IDT Spectrum licenses.
The FCC is very clear on the requirements for construction/coverage and substantial service, it is not a
theoretical exercise for potential or hypothetical signals coming from a proposed system. At the time of
the filing, the system must be broadcasting and operational. If IDT and Spectrum Holdings renewed their
3

39 GHz licenses under the fraudulent misrepresentation that the systems existed and met the
requirements when in reality they did not, then their licenses should never have been renewed in the
first place and should now be taken away from them now. Plus, there is the tiny issue about lying to the
Federal Government, who, like most people, does not like being lied to.
In this report, we show evidence that many, if not all of the 39 GHz system sites that
IDT/Spectrum/Straight Path purported to build were never built nor operating to the required
performance specifications to meet substantial service. We were not able to check or prove that each
and every site was fictional. However, because we believe almost every single Required Notification
filing was fraud, we are confident that anyone who investigates a random sample of 10 sites purported
to be built will discover the truth that they never existed. In the appendix, we present a full list of the
relevant FCC Universal Licensing System (ULS) Application file numbers so that readers, investors, and
the FCC can verify our claims for themselves.

Example #1
IDT Spectrum, LLC Application File #0004842980, Call Sign WPQV276, North Platte, NE, BEA121
Lets start with a look at the Substantial Service Notification Application of IDT Spectrum, LLC, filed on
August 17, 2011, found using the FCC ULS Application website:

Source: FCC Universal Licensing System, #0004842980

The actual filing that IDT submitted claiming to demonstrate construction of the wireless system is
below, and is an attachment under the Admin tab on the FCC website:

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276

The details of how the substantial service was demonstrated is below. With the purported system IDT
covers 45,926 people or 73.34% of the population in BEA121. The system hardware is a Tx Power
Modified Digital Microwave XP 4 (Avago 6442 in parallel), with a strength of 33 dBm. Both locations
have an Rx Threshold (1Mb/s data rate) of -90 dBm. The Hub Antenna gain is 40 dBi, and the Remote
Antenna gain (quad 2 foot antenna array) is 48 dBi.

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276
6

The Friis Transmission Equation calculations in logarithmic form for this particular site is below. This just
says that at the maximum radius of 52.8 miles around the site, receiving antennas can get at least -90
dBm or 1 picowatt of power from the transmitting antenna signal.

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276
The transmitting hub is located in North Platte, NE, at the 3201 S. Jeffers, North Platte, NE address and
(41.105006, -100.762986) latitude/longitude specified in the filing.

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276
IDT included a helpful map showing the vast 52.8 mile radius coverage of their system.

So theoretically, based on the filings claims, IDTs system provides substantial service to BEA 121 and
they should get the license renewed for the 39 GHz license there. And the FCC did renew this license on
11/8/11.
So what is fishy about this filing, and why do we believe that IDT never actually built the system, much
less have it operating and performing as they claim?
The North Platte, NE site cannot be, and was never used for IDTs system
We can see what the site looks like in person, thanks to Google Maps Street View:

Source: Google Maps Street View, location (41.105006, -100.762986)

If you pan around, you can see that all the buildings are 1 story tall (15 feet), and there are no cell phone
towers or tall structures over 5 stories tall in the immediate vicinity. Giving IDT the benefit of the doubt,
even if IDTs site location was mistyped and they didnt build a tower on top of the Overland Trails Boy
Scouts Service Center, the maximum height of the antenna is around 75 feet tall. We checked a random
sampling of multiple sites that IDT claims to be built, and never found any evidence that systems were
built (except for the San Fran and New York exceptions).
This is relevant, because at 75 feet high, the maximum distance to the horizon is only 10.6 miles.
However, in the filing the signal range radius claimed by IDT is 52.8 miles. This is from an antenna
powered at 33 dBm, or 2 watts. To compare, a normal cell phone device has power of 1-2 watts. A really
tall cell tower has a max range 45 miles but using 10 watts and at under 3 GHz frequencies. Could IDT
really have transmitted at 1/10 the power level of a cell phone tower a signal at 1 Mbit/second 52.8
miles away?
Unless IDT built an 1,845 foot tall structure (50% higher than the Empire State Building!) and placed
their transmitting antenna on top of it, it was impossible for IDT to provide substantial service in 39 GHz
for this site at a 52.8 mile radius around it. If the antenna was only 75 feet tall, and the coverage radius
is decreased to 10.6 miles, the much smaller area could cause the population covered to fall below 20%
of the area and the license to be rejected for renewal. We believe this is further evidence that IDT was
gaming the system by stating coverage radii that are so large to be completely unrealistic just to get the
license renewed.
Not only is the systems claimed performance an impossibility that violates the laws of geometry (and
physics as propagation for 39 GHz is 1-2 kilometers), IDT never leased space there to place their
antennas and equipment.
So did IDT really built their wireless 39 GHz system as stated on their application that led to the renewal
of their 39 GHz licenses in BEA 121, North Platte, NE? Almost certainly they did not build anything, much
9

less a working wireless point-to-multipoint system, and if they did not build an operating system, then
they committed outright fraud against the FCC.

10

Example #2
IDT Spectrum, LLC Application File #0004752746, Call Sign WPQU881, Twin Falls, ID, BEA149
Lets look at another site IDT claims to have built and operating on 6/6/11, the Twin Falls, ID BEA149 site.
For the Twin Falls, ID location, the demonstration of Construction/Coverage filing, is very similar and in
fact comes from the same template as the North Platte, NE filing.

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPU881
This particular filing template is used over and over again by IDT and Spectrum Holdings to get almost all
of their 173 BEA 39 GHz license renewals, with the exception of the 8 point-to-point links locations, and
the 2010 filing for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose in BEA163, which we will discuss later.
The site is located at 115 Addison Avenue, Twin Falls, ID (42.563362, -114.479642), and has a radius of
33.5 miles.

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPU881
This is what the site looks like in person:

11

Source: Google Maps Street View, location (42.563362, -114.479642)

There are no buildings around higher than 5 stories tall, no cell phone towers are large structures to
place an antenna. But, to get a radius of 33.5 miles, IDT would have to put the antenna 750 feet high, or
75 stories, above the ground. Maybe IDT built a really tall tower on top of the supermarket or Jiffy Lube
nearby?

12

Example #3
49 IDT sites over 30 miles radius
Just based on the physics and geometry alone, it is easily proved that all of the 49 IDT filings of
demonstration of construction/coverage that claim a coverage radius over 30 miles has to be fabricated.
Below is a list of FCC Application file numbers for IDT Spectrum, LLC that have radius over 30 miles, and
leave the discovery of the truth behind this sites to the reader.
IDT Spectrum, LLC Construction/Coverage filings that are likely fabricated, claimed radius over 30 miles
(FCC application file numbers)
0004421791
0004421826
0004421857
0004422168
0004423636
0004662763
0004680471
0004706971
0004706978
0004752739

0004752746
0004752753
0004752756
0004777416
0004810073
0004810089
0004810095
0004810099
0004810104
0004810111

0004810114
0004810121
0004827250
0004827270
0004833949
0004838988
0004838991
0004838994
0004838998
0004839000

0004839003
0004839006
0004839009
0004839013
0004839017
0004839020
0004842980
0004856533
0004856537
0004856542

0004856545
0004856552
0004856555
0004864486
0004897958
0004897962
0004897965
0004897968
0004897972

13

Errors and typos in IDTs and Spectrum Holdings expose a copy-paste, find-replace process of robofiling
IDT Spectrum, LLC Application File #0004688413, Call Sign WPQU240, New York-No. New Jer.-Long Isl,
BEA010
The system that IDT claims to have built on top of the IDT Corporation headquarters building at 520
Broad Street, New Jersey, NJ, is a case of where their find/replace, copy-paste system of building sites
goes wrong and is more evidence of falsifying documents.
Below is the first demonstration of construction/coverage filing IDT made for their BEA010 site, first
filed on 4/13/11:

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQU240
Notice in the yellow highlights and bracketed comments, that whoever wrote this filing forgot to
find/replace the location from the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose filing, as well as changing the
language from rural areas, which are not really application for New York.
14

We also see the specs of the system and more comments about possible errors in the filing. Notice the
stated Hub TX Power of 20 dBm and the radius of 21 miles.

Source: Substantial Service Application, initial, for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276, 4/13/11
So this filing, with the highlighted comments and errors, stayed in the FCC system from 4/13/11 until
6/23/11, when IDT realized their mistakes and then filed amendment #1 on 6/23/11, and then
amendment #2 on 7/21/11.
If you look at amendment #2s filings system specifications and radius, you can see that IDT changed the
power from 20 dBm to 33 dB and added the Link Margin Friis calculation, in-line with the standard filing
template, and the radius was decreased from 21 miles to 14.9 miles.

15

Source: Substantial Service Application, amendment #2, for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQV276,
7/21/11
We believe that these amendments and changes to the filing indicate the easily-made word processing
errors inherent in the process of fabricating most of the 173 substantial service demonstration
requirements.
On the other hand, of all the 173 sites IDT claims to have built, the New York site is probably the only 1
other actual site actually built, in addition to the first site for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose in BEA163.
The reason is because this location is at IDT Corporation headquarters, which IDT Spectrum obviously
has access to and permission to place antennas and equipment on the roof. However, the errors seen in
the initial filing come from trying to adapt a falsified template method (thus the copy-paste errors), with
the actual specs of the system that the engineers may have designed and built.
The site covering San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose in BEA163, file #0004338108, being the first filing and
at the location for Endgate Associates/Doug Lockie residence/office, may also be a real site because IDT
Spectrum would have access to the building and permission to put an antenna on it.

16

Economic and common sense reasons why IDT Spectrum didnt build out 173 wireless sites
Besides the already overwhelming evidence already supporting our thesis that IDT Spectrum falsified
their construction/coverage requirements and didnt actually build the systems, we list here some
further reasons why the sites are largely fictional
As these reasons are mostly common sense, we simply state them here and leave the exercise of
verification to the readers, investors, and the FCC.
1. On October 13, 2010, Michael Rapaport signed the Spectrum Portfolio Agreement with IDT for
his profit sharing and development cost sharing for getting IDTs 39 GHz licenses renewed. By
November 29, 2011, or just 13 months later, how was he able to build out 173 wireless sites?
Note that Rapaport stated that he was working primarily by himself and subcontractors to find
potential locations for the sites, negotiate with the multiple parties involved (building owner,
land owner, local municipalities) to place an antenna on a roof, hire a firm to climb on the roofs
of the hotel/office building/residential house/apartment, install and configure the antenna,
2. According to the court filings of the IDT Corporation v. Rapaport litigation, Rapaport spent just
$700,000 developing, renewing and building out the substantial service required for all 173
IDT sites and 122 Spectrum Holdings sites? Even if IDT shouldered 82% of the costs, according to
the Spectrum Portfolio Agreement, that gives a total cost for development of $3.9 million dollars,
way too small for the number of sites, difficult geographies, and short time required. FiberTower
claims a similar project would have cost them $10-12 million.

3. The costs of development and ongoing lease sites for IDTs 173 buildouts do not appear
anywhere in the SEC filings financial statements in any year between 2002-2015 of IDT
Corporation, the S-1 IPO prospectus of IDT Spectrum, or Straight Path Communications. The
costs of building the sites out and the ongoing lease expenses (usual telecom rooftop lease is 525 years) would either be expensed or capitalized and show up in the financials.

4. The lawyers (Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP) and IDT employees (Greg Haledijian, Joseph Sandri, Jr.)
who had historically signed off on IDT Spectrum, LLCs FCC filings (see file #0003401972 for
example), did not sign any of IDTs construction/coverage filings. Instead, Michael Rapaport is
the sole signer of the construction/coverage filings, a red flag that perhaps the companys legal
counsel was not comfortable with putting their name behind the filings, which are largely
misrepresentations.

5. How come IDT was the only large holder of 39 GHz spectrum that could meet the substantial
service requirements and renew their licenses before the June 1, 2012 date? The answer is that
IDT never actually constructed anything. This is not fair to FiberTower, Airband, and other
companies who made bona fide attempts to keep their spectrum, but were rejected by the FCC
and their licenses were terminated. If the systems werent built and operating, IDTs current
ownership of 39 GHz spectrum is misappropriation of US Government assets under false
pretenses, and the licenses should be stripped from them and given back to the FCC.
17

Compare IDTs sites to real sites that other companies are operating real sites in 39 GHz
Out of the 2,422 total potential 39 GHz licenses, we did find 16 construction filings made by other
companies that appear to be legitimately constructed. The reasons why we think they are legitimate is
because the radius of coverage is under 20 miles, and the locations are found in a centralized area
usually on company property. It is easy and cheap to put a 39 GHz antenna on your own property in a
single city. Its not that easy to build them in 173 locations across the country.
Here, we give a single example of Nextlinks location in San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose BEA163 to show
what a real site looks like.
Nextlink Wireless, LLC #0005333354, call sign WPQT940

18

Source: Substantial Service Application for IDT Spectrum for call sign WPQT940

In person Street View:

Source: Google Maps Street View, location (37.49156, -121.93112)

Notice that the building locations address and latitude/longitude is at the XO Communications building,
the parent of Nextlink Wireless. In contrast, IDTs sites, at the hotels, apartment buildings, and
commercial buildings are not IDT-owned property. Also note that their lawyers signed off on the filing.
Also note that their antennas are directional, not perfect circle radius like IDTs systems.
Here is the location of PVT Networks, Inc.s site, filing #0005209965, in Hobbs, NM BEA 136

19

Source: Google Maps Street View, location (32.840777, -104.446122)

Notice that antennas, communications structures, and other wireless equipment is visible and clearly
operating. IDTs sites have no visible wireless equipment.

Below is a list of the 16 file numbers of the construction/coverage notifications of successfully renewed
39 GHz licenses for other companies, and leave verification to readers, investors, and the FCC.
Other companies Construction/Coverage fillings that are likely to be real (FCC application file numbers)
0004370667
0005209965
0005239239
0005262086
0005262094
0005262100
0005262106
0005262140

0005333354
0005333357
0005333367
0005333399
0005333406
0005333412
0005333446
0005358151

20

Conclusion
The truth about Straight Paths licenses and the false construction/coverage claims will eventually come
out from the source. The fraud is just too massive, too spread out, and too easily verifiable. If the
individuals and corporations involved attempt to cover up the truth, they will just compound their
mistakes. Lying to the Federal Government is already really bad, covering it up is even worse. We
recommend any individuals involved to come clean to the FCC and other regulatory bodies immediately.
As short sellers, we have economic incentives in seeing Straight Paths stock decline. But we arent doing
this solely for the money. Like police detectives, who earn a living by making our society a better place,
we also are paid to illuminate the truth, expose fraud, and uphold justice.
Despite the debate, uproar and controversy that will erupt after the claims of this report are verified,
please keep in mind that short selling is good for investors, good for the markets, and ultimately good
for America.

21

Appendix
IDT Spectrum, LLC Construction/Coverage fillings that could be real (FCC application file numbers)
0004338108
0004688413
IDT Spectrum, LLC Construction/Coverage filings that are likely fabricated (FCC application file numbers)
0004897946 0004745865 0004897962 0004658529 0004839020
0004685093 0004745869 0004777405 0004680474 0004915447
0004685097 0004745873 0004856552 0004658542 0004862085
0004685106 0004745877 0004810121 0004897968 0004648719
0004685109 0004897950 0004777413 0004838988 0004435879
0004685113 0004813950 0004777416 0004838991 0004752739
0004680426 0004745885 0004741287 0004838994 0004752743
0004680431 0004856533 0004741293 0004838998 0004752746
0004827270 0004813952 0004777422 0004839000 0004752749
0004685118 0004897955 0004777425 0004839003 0004642148
0004685122 0004856537 0004777428 0004839006 0004810089
0004668095 0004680440 0004777432 0004839009 0004831063
0004810070 0004658411 0004777437 0004839013 0004650362
0004810073 0004658422 0004777444 0004839017 0004833949
0004813945 0004658426 0004777450 0004842980 0004642151
0004813948 0004658433 0004777454 0004706971 0004650370
0004810080 0004658437 0004777459 0004707033 0004642159
0004810099 0004856542 0004777463 0004707047 0004642168
0004810104 0004680445 0004777468 0004707088 0004642131
0004810111 0004680452 0004768072 0004833945 0004642137
0004745853 0004680459 0004768057 0004706978 0004668110
0004810114 0004903290 0004768077 0004703984 0004642154
0004745856 0004662763 0004768054 0004703992 0004810095
0004742824 0004662774 0004897965 0004703998 0004757532
0004742827 0004680467 0004764205 0004704010 0004757524
0004745860 0004680471 0004764196 0004704023 0004752753
0004742830 0004662787 0004768061 0004704064 0004752756
0004742833 0004658469 0004768046 0004704435 0004757514
0004742839 0004827256 0004856555 0004704583 0004864485
0004742848 0004827250 0004658493 0004704601 0004897972
0004741272 0004658480 0004658466 0004704613 0005148642
0004741267 0004658489 0004658507 0004696422
0004742811 0004897958 0004658510 0004642144
0004741277 0004856545 0004658514 0004696403
0004741281 0004777397 0004658520 0004696369

22

Spectrum Holdings Technologies, LLC filings that are likely fabricated (FCC application file numbers)
0005250387
0005251392
0005251519
0005242570
0005250388
0005251579
0005250415
0005253951
0005251589
0005251595
0005250344
0005242579
0005253955
0005253958
0005250426
0005253961
0005253962
0005251698
0005251703
0005251711
0005250448
0005267236
0005250469
0005258427
0005253963

0005253960
0005253964
0005251731
0005251738
0005251744
0005251749
0005253966
0005250490
0005253969
0005256324
0005251772
0005253973
0005253976
0005253979
0005253981
0005253984
0005253986
0005251780
0005253987
0005250326
0005253989
0005253992
0005251800
0005242568
0005253994

0005242585
0005254012
0005251832
0005256326
0005254014
0005250330
0005254015
0005254018
0005256329
0005256331
0005256334
0005254021
0005256335
0005256337
0005254023
0005256347
0005251838
0005254025
0005254028
0005256348
0005251845
0005254031
0005251858
0005251865
0005258445

0005250331
0005256349
0005256350
0005251876
0005254033
0005251878
0005251880
0005254035
0005256351
0005254027
0005254038
0005242586
0005254041
0005250345
0005256356
0005258452
0005258456
0005258470
0005258476
0005251923
0005254043
0005256357
0005254045
0005242582
0005242561

0005242565
0005258479
0005256358
0005242574
0005242572
0005250348
0005258780
0005242556
0005242559
0005251937
0005250482
0005251988
0005254048
0005251993
0005256360
0005254050
0005250309
0005254053
0005251997
0005258781
0005256361
0005258784

23