The document discusses the definition and purpose of a preliminary examination in a criminal case. It notes that the fiscal has quasi-judicial discretion to determine whether or not to file criminal charges in court based on the preliminary examination. As a general rule, injunctions will not be granted to restrain a criminal prosecution. However, there are exceptions as outlined in the Brocka vs Enrile case, such as when prosecution would violate the accused's constitutional rights or when there is clearly no prima facie case against the accused. The quantum of evidence required in a preliminary investigation is enough to "engender" a well-founded belief that a crime was committed and the respondent is probably guilty.
The document discusses the definition and purpose of a preliminary examination in a criminal case. It notes that the fiscal has quasi-judicial discretion to determine whether or not to file criminal charges in court based on the preliminary examination. As a general rule, injunctions will not be granted to restrain a criminal prosecution. However, there are exceptions as outlined in the Brocka vs Enrile case, such as when prosecution would violate the accused's constitutional rights or when there is clearly no prima facie case against the accused. The quantum of evidence required in a preliminary investigation is enough to "engender" a well-founded belief that a crime was committed and the respondent is probably guilty.
The document discusses the definition and purpose of a preliminary examination in a criminal case. It notes that the fiscal has quasi-judicial discretion to determine whether or not to file criminal charges in court based on the preliminary examination. As a general rule, injunctions will not be granted to restrain a criminal prosecution. However, there are exceptions as outlined in the Brocka vs Enrile case, such as when prosecution would violate the accused's constitutional rights or when there is clearly no prima facie case against the accused. The quantum of evidence required in a preliminary investigation is enough to "engender" a well-founded belief that a crime was committed and the respondent is probably guilty.
PADERANGA vs DRILON FACTS: Definition of Preliminary Examination
Generally inquisitorial, often only means of discovering thepersons who may
be reasonably charged with a crime, to enable the fiscal to prepare his complaint or information.The institution of a criminal action depends upon the sound discretion of the Fiscal. He has thequasi-judicial discretion to determine wither or not a criminal case should be filed in Court. General Rule: Injunction will not be granted to restrain a criminal prosecution Exception (Brocka vs Enrile): 1. Afford adequate protection to the constitutional rights of the accused2. Necessary for the orderly administration of justice or to avoid oppression or multiplicity of actions3. When there is a prejudicial question4. When the acts of the officers are without or excess of authority5. Double jeopardy is clearly apparent 6. When the Court has no jurisdiction over the offense7. A case of persecution rather than prosecution8. The charges are manifestly false and motivated by vengeance9. Clearly no Prima Facie case against the accused The right of the accused to ask clarificatory questions is not ABSOLUTE. QUANTUM OF EVIDENCE required in preliminary investigation is such such evidence sufficient to engender a well -founded belief as to the fact of the omission of a crime and respondents probableguilt.