Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10194-005-0240-8
Paola Perozzo
Lidia Savi
Lorys Castelli
Walter Valfr
Rossana Lo Giudice
Salvatore Gentile
Innocenzo Rainero
Lorenzo Pinessi
P. Perozzo
Fondazione Carlo Molo,
CE.R.NE., Turin, Italy
L. Savi W. Valfr R. Lo Giudice
S. Gentile I. Rainero () L. Pinessi
Neurology III - Headache Center,
Department of Neuroscience,
University of Turin,
Via Cherasco 15, I-10126 Turin, Italy
e-mail: irainero@molinette.piemonte.it
Tel.: +39-011-6334763
Fax: +39-011-6638510
L. Castelli
Center for Cognitive Science,
Department of Psychology,
University of Turin, Turin, Italy
ORIGINAL
Introduction
It is well recognised that negative affective states, like
anger, hostility and fear, are deeply involved in the emotional experience of pain [1]. Increased anger and hostility have been widely observed in patients with chronic ill-
nesses like cardiovascular diseases and arthritis and several authors have suggested that these symptoms may
influence the disease progression [24]. FrommReichman [5] suggested that a personality disposition
associated with unconscious conflicts plays an important
role both in the frequency and in the intensity of anger
experience in chronic pain patients, but others suggested
393
contribution to better characterising the different therapeutic approaches in different subtypes of headache
patients.
394
Number
Migraine
Episodic
tension-type
headache
Chronic
tension-type
headache
Migraine
and episodic
tension-type
headache
Migraine
and chronic
tension-type
headache
45
51
31
26
52
41
38.611.1
35.211.3
40.318.0
51.815.0
39.512.0
43.714.7
Males, n (%)
21 (47)
18 (35)
11 (35)
11 (42)
12 (23)
8 (20)
Females, n (%)
24 (53)
33 (65)
20 (65)
15 (58)
40 (77)
33 (80)
28 (62)
14 (31)
3 (7)
0 (0)
19 (36)
28 (54)
3 (6)
2 (4)
10 (50)
9 (45)
0 (0)
1 (5)
5 (24)
12 (57)
0 (0)
4 (19)
13 (23)
41 (73)
1 (2)
1 (2)
7 (24)
19 (66)
1 (3)
2 (7)
Education, n (%)
Low
Moderate
High
11 (24)
20 (43)
15 (33)
24 (46)
26 (50)
2 (4)
9 (45)
7 (35)
4 (20)
15 (71)
6 (29)
0 (0)
29 (52)
21 (37)
6 (11)
18 (62)
9 (31)
2 (7)
19.710.0
14.49.4
23.211.9
Duration of migraine
attacks (h), meanSD
32.032.6
33.635.5
40.842.0
Migraine attacks
per year, meanSD
59.567.9
70.578.0
83.9110.0
25.816.9
29.816.6
25.59.2
38.919.0
Duration of tension-type
headache attacks (h),
meanSD
28.528.6
28.328.2
26.131.8
44.154.2
Tension-type headache
attacks per year, meanSD
82.247
328.193.9
109.696.6
281.3133.8
3. Cognitive Behavioral Assessment (CBA 2.0) [21] is a comprehensive battery of psychological scales, validated on the
Italian population. It consists of 10 primary scales and 2 secondary scales (scales 1 and 4: anamnesis, 84 items). The primary scales are: scales 2 and 3, State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory (STAI), a 40-item self-rated scale evaluating anxiety as a reaction to episodic stress conditions (STAI-X1)
and as a predisposition producing anxious behaviour (STAIX2); scale 5: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short form
(EPQ), which consists of 48 items and 4 subscales (R-E,
intratensiveextratensive; R-N, emotional liability; R-P,
antisociality and maladjustment; R-L, simulation); scale 6:
Psychophysiological Questionnaire short-form (QPF/R) consisting of 30 items for the evidence of psychophysiological
disorders; scale 7: Phobias Inventory short form (IP), a 58item scale (IP-R) divided into 5 subscales (IP-1, calamities;
IP-2, social phobia; IP-3, repellent animals; IP-4, departure;
IP-5, physicians and blood); scale 8: QD consisting of 24
items for depressive symptoms; scale 9: Maudsley
Obsessive-Compulsive Questionnaire (MOCQ) which consists of 21 items (MOCQ-R) evaluating obsessive-compul-
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences [SPSS] for
Windows was used for the statistical analysis. A first one-way
ANOVA was run in order to evaluate differences in demographic and clinical features in the sample. Bonferronis post hoc was
used for multiple comparisons. In order to compare all test
scores we performed a second one-way ANOVA followed by
Dunnetts post hoc analysis. Healthy subjects were used as the
control category. Finally, a third one-way ANOVA was run
excluding the control group. Multiple comparisons between the
headache groups were examined through Bonferronis post hoc.
The level of statistical significance was taken as p0.05.
395
Results
The clinical characteristics of headache patients and controls are shown in Table 1. Although the malefemale distribution is not the same among the subgroups, the difference is not statistically significant (2=10.73; ns). As far
as educational level is concerned, results showed significant differences between subgroups ( 2=34.033;
p<0.001). Specifically all the subgroups of patients,
except for patients with episodic tension-type headache,
showed a lower level of education in comparison to controls (p<0.004).
Patients suffering from chronic tension-type headache
were found to be significantly older than the other groups
of patients (p0.05); this difference was not significant
only in comparison to patients with migraine associated
with chronic tension-type headache. Moreover, the latter
were older than patients with migraine (p0.05). Patients
with migraine associated with chronic tension-type
headache revealed a significantly longer history of
headache (p0.05) compared to migraine, episodic tension-type headache and migraine associated with episodic
tension-type headache patients. Patients with chronic tension-type headache also had a longer history of headache
(p0.05) compared to the migraine group. No significant
differences were found in the duration of headache attacks
between the different groups. Chronic tension-type
headache patients with or without migraine showed a significantly higher number of headache attacks per year in
comparison to patients with migraine, episodic tensiontype headache and migraine with episodic tension-type
headache (p0.05).
Table 2 shows univariate results for the STAXI in
healthy subjects and in patients with headache. Dunnetts
post hoc revealed that, in comparison to controls, anger
Table 2 State and Trait Anger Expression scores in controls and in headache patients
Controls
Migraine
13.67.3
11.12.4
11.72.9*
18.07.2
6.22.2
8.12.9
18.13.9
6.51.9
8.52.4
Anger-in
17.35.1
Anger-out
Anger control
Anger expression
Episodic
Chronic
tension-type tension-type
headache
headache
Migraine
and episodic
tension-type
headache
Migraine
and chronic
tension-type
headache
F value
13.05.3*
12.73.8*
12.84.8*
1.66
ns
19.04.3*
6.92.1*
8.42.2*
19.55.5*
7.42.4*
8.63.1*
20.44.8*
7.52.2*
9.62.7*
21.05.9*
7.62.6*
9.83.2*
2.31
3.02
2.57
0.045
0.012
0.027
17.14.5
18.75.6*
17.95.2*
19.54.5*
19.65.2*
2.21
ns
13.03.7
14.03.0
13.52.9*
13.73.6*
14.23.5*
13.73.4*
0.73
ns
26.05.0
23.35.5
22.84.9*
22.66.0*
22.85.6*
23.05.1*
2.51
0.031
22.411.0
24.19.4
25.58.8*
25.09.4*
26.79.5*
26.59.8*
1.25
ns
2.32.0
MOCQ/R-1 Checking
16.95.0
0.71.1
2.21.5
2.42.0
5.03.0
7.55.0
4.54.3
10.58.1
18.06.0**##
1.52.6**##
2.41.9**##
4.32.7**##
7.34.4**##
7.34.5**##
4.63.6**##
8.76.8**##
21.811.8*v#v
16.48.8**##
65.528.7**##
48.711.0**##
8.13.2**##
2.21.2**##
6.53.5**##
7.03.8**#v
5.34.2**##
44.511.9*###
38.611.5**##
9.37.3**##
Episodic
tension-type
headache
24.06.1***###$$
2.01.3**#*##$$
3.12.1***###$$
4.52.6***###$$
9.14.7***###$$
8.54.8***###$$
9.58.5***##$#$
10.77.5***###$$
23.813.2***###$$
18.110.5***###$$
75.740.5***###$$
61.212.7***###$$
8.32.4***###$$
2.92.0***###$$
7.83.1***###$$
6.93.5***###$$$
9.94.3***###$$
50.910.7***###$$
48.612.3***###$$
15.07.7***###$$
Chronic
tension-type
headache
#p0.05, ##p0.01 and ###p0.001 in comparison with migraine (Bonferronis post hoc)
$p0.05, $$p0.01 in comparison with episodic tension-type headache (Bonferronis post hoc)
*p0.05, **p0.01 and ***p0.001 in comparison with controls (Dunnetts post hoc)
17.04.1
4.33.2
6.33.9
1.81.6
3.53.9
IP-4 Departure
0.50.8
7.76.7
MOCQ/R-3
Doubting/ruminating
18.610.6
16.89.4
MOCQ/R-2 Cleaning
16.17.9
64.331.6
13.78.8
47.612.9
8.12.4
53.430.5
EPQ/R-L Simulation
5.13.6
2.61.5
IP-1 Calamities
7.52.5
EPQ/R-P Antisociality
and maladjustment
2.91.8
4.34.2
8.63.4
42.42.4
4.03.0
EPQ/R-E Intra/extratensive
41.110.5
QPF/R Psychophysiological
disorders
3.83.8
8.33.3
QD Depression
37.89.5
7.55.8
36.99.0
6.05.5
36.99.0
BDI Depression
Migraine
Controls
19.46.3***###
1.72.2**#*##
2.21.8***###
3.62.6***###
6.84.5***###
8.85.1***###
7.06.5***###
10.88.5###
26.510.2***###
20.07.8***###
81.036***###
53.813.6***###
9.36.3***###
2.61.4***###
8.36.1***###
7.53.0***###
6.84.7***###
50.110.1***###
43.311.4*#**##
13.18.6***###
Migraine
and episodic
tension-type
headache
21.77.2***###$$
1.91.5***###$$
2.51.7***###$$
3.82.3***###$$
7.44.1***###$$
9.84.2***###$$
8.87.4***###$$
12.88.9***###$$
26.410.5***###$$
21.08.7***###$$
89.940.8***##$#$
57.512.7***##$#$
8.62.5***###$$
2.61.5***###$$
7.73.5***###$$
6.83.7***###$$
7.55.1***###$$
51.412.7***###$$
47.612.8***###$$
14.29.8***###$$
Migraine
and chronic
tension-type
headache
Table 3 Becks Depression Inventory, State and Trait Anxiety Inventory and Cognitive Behavioral Assessment in controls and in headache patients
8.13
6.27
2.18
6.20
7.02
3.15
6.68
2.13
6.36
4.37
6.23
11.87
1.27
0.87
7.84
2.18
9.12
11.94
8.91
9.88
F value
<0.001
<0.001
ns
<0.001
<0.001
0.009
<0.001
ns
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
ns
ns
<0.001
ns
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
396
397
Discussion
Our study was performed in a population of patients with
migraine and/or tension-type headache referring to a
headache centre. It is well known that headache patients
seeking medical assistance report more frequent
headaches, greater functional disability and present psychological characteristics different from headache patients
who do not consult physicians [23]. Taking into account
the characteristics of the population we have studied, we
found interesting findings on anger control and emotional
distress in our headache patients.
First, anger control was significantly lower in all the
headache patients we examined except in migraine, in
accordance with some studies [12] but not with others [13,
14]. Tension-type headache patients, regardless of the clinical subtype, the frequency of attacks or the duration of the
disease, presented a reduced ability to monitor and to prevent the experience of anger. In patients with episodic tension-type headache, Hatch et al. [12] found a reduced ability to control angry feelings but no data on migraine patients
is available. The authors also found higher scores in anger
suppression (anger-in), in general index of anger expression
(AX/EX) and trait anger (T-anger), but no significant differences were found between the headache patients and the
controls for the expressed anger (anger-out) scores. In
accordance with Hatch et al. [12], we thought that the lack
of anger control of our patients was related to an increase in
the experience of anger as feelings of resentment, mistrust
or frustration rather than representing a direct expression of
anger toward other people or objects.
Second, in our study, anger-in and anger-out scores
were not significantly different among the headache
patients even when compared with controls. These finding
do not match with several studies dealing with the way
headache patients express angry feelings: as previously
reported [11, 12], headache patients are often inhibited in
expressing anger compared to healthy controls.
398
References
1. Fernandez E, Turk DC (1995) The
scope and significance of anger in the
experience of chronic pain. Pain
61:165175
2. Burns JW, Evon D, Strain-Saloum C
(1999) Repressed anger and patterns of
cardiovascular, self-report and behavioural responses: effects of harassment.
J Psychosom Res 47:569578
5. Fromm-Reichman F (1937)
Contribution to the psychogenesis of
migraine. Psychoanal Rev 24:2635
6. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R, Jacob MC
(1994) Anger expression and chronic
pain. J Behav Med 17:5767
7. Duckro PN, Chibnall JT, Tomazic TJ
(1995) Anger, depression and disability: a path analysis of relationships in a
sample of chronic posttraumatic
headache patients. Headache 35:79
399
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.