Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Imaging
PICTORIAL ESSAY
Secretin-stimulated MRCP
N. J. Lee,1,2 K. W. Kim,1 T. K. Kim,1,3 M. H. Kim,4 S. Y. Kim,1 M.-S. Park,1,5 A. Y. Kim,1
H. K. Ha,1 P. N. Kim,1 M.-G. Lee1
1
Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, Pungnap 2-dong, Songpa-gu,
Seoul 138-736, Korea
2
Department of Radiology, Eulgi Medical Center, 280-1, Hagye-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-711, Korea
3
Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G2C4
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, Pungnap 2-dong,
Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea
5
Department of Radiology, Yong Dong Severance Hospital, 146-92 Dokok-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 137-270, Korea
Abstract
Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not only facilitate the depiction of anatomic
variations or morphologic changes of the pancreatic duct
in the normal and diseased pancreas but also help assessing functional abnormalities of the exocrine pancreas. In
this article, we illustrate ndings of normal pancreas and
various pancreatic diseases on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation.
Key words: Magnetic
resonanceCholangiopancreatography, pancreasMagntic resonance, pancreatic
ductsMagnetic resonance, pancreatic function
Secretin
The accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for assessing pancreatic ductal
abnormalities improves after intravenous secretin
administration because it leads to accumulation of uid
and bicarbonates within the pancreatic ducts. In addition
to stimulation of exocrine pancreatic glands, intravenous
administration of a bolus of secretin increases the tonus
of the sphincter of Oddi during the rst 5 to 6 min, which
inhibits release of uid through the papilla of Vater, and
then the tonus of the sphincter decreases [1]. Thus,
enlargement of the pancreatic ducts and an increased
amount of protons within the ducts may improve
depiction of the pancreatic ducts on MRCP [2]. Further,
dynamic MRCP after secretin administration allows
noninvasive functional evaluation of the pancreatic
exocrine gland because the extent of positive duodenal
Techniques
All examinations were performed by using a 1.5-T MR
system (Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a phased array body coil. Coronal and oblique coronal T2-weighted images with single-shot rapid
acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) were
repeatedly obtained to nd a proper view to cover and
display the entire main pancreatic duct. In general, the
coronal view was selected because it clearly depicted not
only the main pancreatic duct but also the biliary tract
and duodenum. For dynamic study, T2-weighted singleshot RARE images were obtained every minute after an
intravenous injection of secretin (1 U/kg body weight;
Secrepan, Eisai, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 min. MR imaging
parameters for the single-shot RARE sequence were an
innite repetition time, 1080-ms effective echo time, 240
echo train length, 30- to 50-mm slab thickness, 300-mm
eld of view, 240 times; 256 matrix size, and 3-s
acquisition time.
Normal findings
Although MRCP before secretin stimulation may display
the full length of the normal-caliber main pancreatic duct
in about 85% to 90% of normal individuals or patients
devoid of pancreatic disease, secretin stimulation clearly
improves delineation of the main pancreatic and Santorini ducts in all patients who have normal pancreatic
exocrine function [2]. Side branches are not seen in
healthy individuals. Chronologically, a progressive
measurable dilatation of the main pancreatic duct is
observed mostly within 2 to 6 min and peaks 2 to 3 min
576
Santorinicele
577
Choledochocele
Fig. 3. Incomplete pancreas divisum in a 53-year-old woman. A MRCP image obtained before secretin administration
shows an abnormal course of the dorsal pancreatic duct
(arrowheads), i.e., crossing the common bile duct to terminate
at the minor papilla. B MRCP image 5 min after secretin
administration clearly shows a small communication (arrowhead) between the dorsal and ventral pancreatic ducts. C
MRCP image 10 min after secretin administration shows
prolonged dilatation of the main and dorsal pancreatic duct
(arrowhead), suggesting functional stenosis of drainage of the
exocrine pancreas.
578
Fig. 5. Choledochocele in a 61-year-old man. A MRCP image obtained before secretin administration shows a small
cystic lesion (arrow) in the second part of the duodenum. B
MRCP image obtained 5 min after secretin administration
better displays a choledochocele or protrusion of a dilated
intramural segment of the common bile duct into the duodenum (arrow). C Photograph from endoscopy shows cystic
dilatation and protrusion of an intramural segment of the
common bile duct into the duodenum.
Fig. 6. Chronic pancreatitis with pancreas divisum in a 43year-old woman. A MRCP image before secretin administration shows an abnormal course of the dorsal pancreatic
duct, i.e., crossing the common bile duct. There is irregular
dilatation and multifocal stenosis (arrowheads) of the main
pancreatic duct. B On MRCP 5 min after secretin administration, the diameter of the main pancreatic duct increases
and the ventral pancreatic duct (large arrow) is visualized.
There are multifocal strictures and dilatation of the main
pancreatic duct (small arrows) and dilatation of side branches
in the tail. C Pancreatic duct diameter returns to its baseline
value on MRCP 10 min after secretin administration. Duodenal filling is seen beyond the genu inferius, most likely
indicating a preserved pancreatic exocrine reserve.
579
Fig. 7. Chronic pancreatitis with decreased exocrine reserve in a 41-year-old man. A MRCP image obtained before
secretin administration shows dilatation of the main pancreatic duct in the body and tail and segmental stenosis in the
head and neck (arrowhead). B On MRCP obtained 5 min after
secretin administration, there is no change in the main pancreatic duct caliber. C On MRCP obtained 10 min after
secretin administration, there is no change in the main pancreatic duct caliber. Duodenal filling after secretin stimulation
is not seen, indicating severe impairment of the exocrine
pancreatic reserve.
580
Fig. 8. Leakage of pancreatic juice with necrotizing pancreatitis in a 39-year-old man. A On MRCP obtained before
secretin administration, the main pancreatic duct is only partly
visualized in the tail (arrow). B On MRCP obtained 5 min after
secretin administration, the main pancreatic duct caliber increases in the tail (arrow). However, the main pancreatic duct
in the other part of the pancreas is still not visualized due to
pancreatic necrosis. A linear hyperintensity (arrowhead) is
seen in the pancreas tail, suggesting leakage of pancreatic
juice. C MRCP obtained 10 min after secretin administration
shows improved opacification of the pancreatic duct in the tail
(arrow), nonvisualization of the duct in the other part, and
leakage of pancreatic juice in the tail (arrowhead).
581
for pancreatic tissue injury and damage to the pancreatic ductal system. Dynamic MRCP after secretin
administration sometimes facilitates the diagnosis of
leakage of pancreatic juice associated with severe acute
pancreatitis, which appears as an abnormal stulous
tract from the pancreatic duct and gradual accumulation of extraluminal pancreatic uid on serial MRCP
images (Fig. 8).
Papillary stenosis
In patients with papillary stenosis, the caliber of the
pancreatic duct increases dramatically after secretin
stimulation and remains enlarged for 10 min. Prolonged
ductal dilatation after stimulation has been demonstrated to be a specic nding in pancreatic outlet
obstruction of various causes [10]. The delay of the
pancreatic duct to reach its maximum diameter after
secretin stimulation does not provide specific independent information except when papillary stenosis occurs
in the absence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency
(Fig. 9).
References
1. Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, et al. (1980) Intraluminal
pressure recording from the human sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology 78:317324
2. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct:
morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR
pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203:435
441
3. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. (2000) Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR
pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 215:358
364
4. Warshaw AL, Richter JM, Schapiro RH (1983) The cause and
treatment of pancreatitis associated with pancreas divisum. Ann
Surg 198:443452
5. Delhaye M, Engelholm L, Cremer M (1985) Pancreas divisum:
congenital anatomical variant or anomaly? Gastroenterology
89:951958
6. Warshaw AL, Simeone JF, Schapiro RH, Flavin-Warshaw
B (1990) Evaluation and treatment of dominant dorsal duct
syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined). Am J Surg 159:59
64
7. Eisen G, Schutz S, Metzler D, et al. (1994) Santorinicele: new
evidence for obstruction in pancreas divisum. Gastrointest Endosc
40:7376
8. Byeon JS, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. (2003) Santorinicele without
pancreas divisum. Gastrointest Endosc 58:800803
9. Kloppel G (1994) Pathology of severe acute pancreatitis. In:
Bradley EL, (ed).. Acute pancreatitis: diagnosis and therapy. New
York: Raven, pp 3546
10. Warshaw AL, Simeone J, Schapiro RH, et al. (1985) Objective
evaluation of papillary stenosis with ultrasonography and pancreatic stimulation. Am J Surg 149:6572