Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Worid Scientific
www.worldscientific.com
1.
Introduction
Driver fatigue progressively impairs driver's awareness about external events,^ which may result in
some abnormal driving behaviors. Although there
may exist some difficulties in estimating the seriousness of driver fatigue, the fact that driver fatigue is
one of the major hazards that contribute to transportation system^ is believed. Various studies have
shown that the driver drowsiness accounts for 16% of
all crashes and over 20% of the accidents in the highways,^^ Assessment for driver fatigue remains to be
a big challenge to meet the demands of future intelligent transportation systems, which can assist driver
Gontextual features
Physiological features.
Drivers' performances and
Gombination of aforementioned features.
* Corresponding author.
1450006-1
R. Fu & H. Wang
1450006-2
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
signals were free from noise and artifact contamination. Then some features of driving fatigue were
studied, based on the statistical analysis results given
by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z test, peak factor of EMG
[p < 0.001) and maximum of cross-relation curve of
EMG and EGG {p < 0.001) were selected as combined features to detect fatigue of drivers. Thus,
Mahalanobis distance (MD) was used to obtain discriminant mode, performance of proposed method
was validated on datasets with different states by 10fold cross-validation. Based on these, a noncontact
onboard vehicle drivers' fatigue detection system is
presented, which is capable of monitoring EMG and
EGG, and detecting drivers' fatigue automatically.
2.
2.1.
Data recording
]^
5min
2h
J
Driving period
lOmin
L
Postdr iving
sitting
Idle
5min
I
Post -rest
sitting
1450006-3
R. Fu & H. Wang
Classifier design
Diia in
training sel
Data analysis
Feature selection
DiscrimintH
cnlcnon
Feature
Classification
decision
\!/
Dala uialysis
Dala acquisition
Fig. 2. Fatigue detection system. Classifier design was finished in calibration part by training data. And classification of
samples with unknown status was realized as lower part in Fig. 2. Program flow is represented by solid arrows. And the
dashed arrows connect each two parts using similar process.
Data pre-processing
x{t) = A
'emgV
(1)
=1
where A is an unknown mixing matrix which represents weights of EMG signal (semg) and EGG signal
(secg), the term of Ni{t) includes various artifacts
to be removed to get EMG and EGG, such as baseline noise induced by breath and body movement
of driver and the 50 Hz electronic noise. Gonsidering
various components of raw signal recorded by sensor
from biceps femoris of each subject, FastlGA and
digital filter are utilized to process original signals to
extract EMG and EGG in this paper.
The goal of FastlGA^^"'^'' is to estimate the
independent components from observed mixture X,
which is obtained from mixing model as X = AS,
where A is an unknown mixing matrix, and S is
unknown source signals. So FastlGA focuses on estimating de-mixing matrix W to get independent
source U form de-mixing model U = WZ, where
1450006-4
Detection of Driving
Fc = ,
(2)
mi
cor_max2
Feature selection
2.4.
cor_maxi
cor_max3
m3
cor_maxn,
hn-l
cor_maxn.i
in.i
cor_max
X - Mz X - Hif
- ^ - ^ 1 + 77-^2,
-1,2,
(5)
criterion
was used in tbis paper aiming to get discriminant criterion, wbicb is a distance measure based
on correlations between variables. It is often used to
measure tbe degree of abnormality as compared to
normal conditions. Tbe calculation of MD between a
vector X and group G is given as follows.
3.
Results
Data pre-processing
-1
d(x,G) =
(3)
wbere /x and J2 ^^e tbe mean vector and tbe covariance matrix of G. Tbe decision rule can be stated
very simply: to classify a feature vector measure tbe
1450006-5
R. Fu & H. Wang
I O
-2
FastICA
-4
(a)
Fig. 4. Demonstration of signal separation by FastICA. (a) 15-s epoch of observed signals containing ECG, EMG and
beiseline noise, (b) Corresponding independent components (ICs) roughly for heart activity (top one) and muscle activity
(lower one).
10
15
Fig, 5, The ECG and EMG, Comparing with signals' detail shown in Fig. 4(b), the baseline noise contamination and
small extent aliasing are elinainated by using band-pass filter.
1450006-6
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
3.2.
Features
3.3.
Discriminant case
Detection of driver fatigue is similar to medical diagnosis, which can often be understood as a supervised
learning.^^"*^ To construct discriminant model, we
choose data of one subject as example. 130 samples
from the first experiment were employed as training
set. Among them, there are 65 alert samples versus
65 fatigue samples. And next day, at the same time,
we have the driving section experiment on the same
subject. Then 30 samples was selected as test set.^^
So we obtained a dataset with 160 samples containing two states, subset Gi is alert state and subset
G2 is fatigue state. To measure the success of classification process, we split these data into training
and test set.''^*'' Considering two features Fc and
corjnax, which are mentioned in Sec. 3.2, discriminant criterion could be obtained by MD (see Sec. 2.4)
using data in training set as,
W = -2.5952Fc - 8.5541cor.max -f3.3985.
(7)
6
7
8
time sectioii
7
8
time section
10
11
12
13
14
Fig. 6. The two normalized features used to estimating the driver fatigue. The upper one is peak factor {Fc), and the
lower sub-figure is maximum of cross-relation curve (cor_max).
1450006-7
R. Fu & H. Wang
4.
Actual class
Alert
Predicated class
Alert
15
Fatigue
4
Recall
0.7895
Fatigue
Precision
0
11
1
0.7333
Accuracy = 0.8667
0.9040
0.8345
Recall
Alert
Eatigue
0.8162
0.9138
El score
Alert
Eatigue
0.8572
0.8718
Accuracy
0.8650
Mean of 10 folds
Precision
Alert
Eatigue
Discussion
by A"-fold cross-validation.4^'''i Then 10-fold crossvalidation was used for assessing the classification
accuracy,'^^''"''^ the mean values of test results are
shown in Table 2.
15
Eig. 7.
The residual of ICs. The signal in upper sub-figure is residual of ICI, and the lower one is residual of IC2.
1450006-8
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
0.5
0.45
Fc
cor-max
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
alert
fatigue
Fig. 8. The bar graph with error of two features. Similar graphs can be useful for comparing significant differences of
features between the subgroups.
approximately six ups and downs during the 15 s,
which is corresponding to the fact that normal range
of breaths is between 12 and 25, and the average resting respiratory rate for adults is 12-20 breaths per
minute. ^^ And compared to IGs contained baseline
noise as shown in Fig. 4(b), the resident of IG2 gave
the trend of EMG. To make the recognition of this
trend easily, we selected a section of postural signal
as example, which means that the change of baseline is not induced by muscle contraction, because
muscle contraction can cause EMG amplitude grow
suddenly. So these may explain the observation of
baseline noise induced by respiration and body movement of subjects. But there may still exist some other
factors which can lead to the change of baseline.
These need further studies.
Fourth, we used FastlGA to realize the rough separation of EMG and EGG, but for all IGA including
FastlGA, they have two intrinsic limitations, these
are (a) magnitude and scaling ambiguity: in IGA
there is no sufficient information to estimate the true
variance of independent components and (b) permutation ambiguity: IGA gives unspecified order of estimated independent components.'''^ And fortunately,
these ambiguities are insignificant in application of
this paper. On one hand, pre-whitening provides
great solution for the first ambiguity. On the other
hand, EMG and EGG have inherent difference, they
Fc
12
driving
section
1 2
6 7 8 9
time section
10 11 12 13 14 15
02
cor-max
0.15
dnving
section
01
* *
^i
005
1 2
6 7 8 9
time section
10 11 12 13 14 15
1450006-9
R. Fu & H. Wang
5.
Conclusion
1450006-10
conductive fabric
cloth
skin
J..s;:i:
body ,.
Fig. A.I.
Noncontact electrode.
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
S 9
-F-
"o
IT
I
a
O
CJ
'-
-Hh
ill
U?
bb
S?
$
IJI1.
1450006-11
R. Fu & H. Wang
was sewn on top surface of car cushion parallely. Reference electrode located on the left ankle
bone.
This conductive knit fabric is silver-plated nylon
that is stretched in both directions. It is highly conductive with a surface resistivity of < 1 Q/sq. It can
collect data when the subject wears normal pants
with width less than 2 mm. Physiological signals with
variable electric potential can be seen as AC power.
Skin and conductive knit fabric were regarded as the
two plates of parallel plate capacitor, meanwhile, the
pants were seen as insulation. Principle of capacitivecoupling is satisfied in this case. So the basic theory
of noncontract electrode can be described as Fig. A.I.
These two pieces of conductive knit fabric were used
as electrodes to collect mixed signals of ECG and
EMG data in noncontact way.
This noncontact electrode is very suitable for
long-term physiological signal acquisition. However,
comparing with contact electrode, data collected
by using noncontact electrode is much weaker and
signal-to-noise-ratio is relatively lower. Then, the
crucial aspect was the design of amplifier.
Taking into account all these aspects, we designed
an amplifier with the structure shown in Fig. A.2, the
main circuit board of finished amplifier can be seen
as Fig. A.3.
References
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
11. M. Ahmadlou and H. Adeli, Wavelet-synchronization methodology: A new approach for EEGbased diagnosis of ADHD, Clin. EEG Neurosci.
41(1) (2010) 1-10.
12. I. Hostens and H. Ramon, Assessment of muscle
fatigue in low level monotonous task performance
during car driving, J. Electromyograph. Kinesiol. 15
(2005) 266-274.
13. J. Yang, Analysis and detection of driver fatigue
caused by sleep deprivation, Ph.D. dissertation,
MIT, Cambridge, MA (2007).
14. S. K. L. Lai and A. Craig, A critical review of the
psychophysiology of driver fatigue, Biol. Psychol. 55
(2001) 173-194.
15. L. L. D. Stasi, R. Renner, A. Catena, J. J. Canas, B.
M. Velichkovsky and S. Pannasch, Towards a driver
fatigue test based on the saccadic main sequence: A
partial validation by subjective report data. Transport. Res. Part C 21 (2012) 122-133.
16. A. Anund, G. Kecklund, A. Vadeby, M. Hjalmdahl and T. Akerstedt, The alerting effect of
hitting a rumble strip-A simulator study with
sleepy drivers, Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 (2008) 19701976.
17. L. Minin, S. Benedetto, M. Pedrotti, A. Re and E.
Tesauri, Measuring the effects of visual demand on
lateral deviation: A comparison among driver's performance indicators, Appl. Ergon. 43 (2012) 486492.
18. C. H. Declerck, C. Boone and B. D. Brabander, On
feeling in control: A biological theory for individual
differences in control perception. Brain Cognit. 62(2)
(2006) 143-176.
19. H. Ueno, M. Kaneda and M. Tsukino, Development
of drowsiness detection system, in Proc Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conf., Japan, Yokohama (1994), pp. 15-20.
20. C. T. Lin, R. C. Wu, S. E. Liang, W. H. Chao, Y. J.
Chen and T. P. Jung, EEG-Based drowsiness estimation for safety driving using independent component
analysis, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 52(12) (2005)
2726-2738.
21. G. Renner and S. Mehring, Lane departure and
drowsiness-Two major accident causes-one safety
system, ^i/i World Congress Intelligence Transport
System, Germany, Berlin (1997) 2264-2272.
22. H. Chen and P. Meer, Robust fusion of uncertain
information, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B 35
(2005) 578-586.
23. C. Conati, Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games, Appl. Artif. Intell. 16
(2002) 555-575.
24. Q. Ji, Z. Zhu and P. Lan, Real-time nonintrusive
monitoring and prediction of driver fatigue, IEEE
Trans. Veh. Technol. 53(4) (2004) 1052-1068.
25. N. Merat and A. H. Jamson, The efi'ect of three
low-cost engineering treatments on driver fatigue: A
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
1450006-13
R. Fu & H. Wang
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
1450006-14
Detection of Driving Fatigue by Using Noncontact EMG and ECG Signals Measurement System
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
1450006-15