Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S030147971500105X Main
1 s2.0 S030147971500105X Main
College of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430081 Hubei, China
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 21 March 2013
Received in revised form
12 February 2015
Accepted 16 February 2015
Available online 27 February 2015
In the steel industry, about 0.86 ton of oily sludge is produced for every 1000 tons of rolling steel. Due to
the adverse impact on human health and the environment, oily sludge is designated as a hazardous
waste in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRT). In this paper, the pyrolysis treatment of oily
sludge is studied in a uidized bed reactor at a temperature range of 400e600 C. During oily sludge
pyrolysis, a maximum oil yield of 59.2% and a minimum energy loss of 19.0% are achieved at 500 C. The
energy consumption of treating 1 kg oily sludge is only 2.4e2.9 MJ. At the same time, the energy of
produced oil, gas and solid residue are 20.8, 6.32, and 0.83 MJ, respectively. In particular, it is found that
the solid residue contains more than 42% iron oxide, which can be used as the raw material for iron
production. Thus, the simultaneous recovery of energy and iron from oil sludge by pyrolysis is feasible.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Oily sludge
Pyrolysis
Fluidized bed
Energy
Iron
Recovery
1. Introduction
Oily sludge, generated from the rolling steel process, is a waste
product comprising dense slurry of iron nes in lubricating oil and
water with other contaminants such as heavy metals (Biswal et al.,
2009). It was estimated that about 0.86 ton of oily sludge was
produced for every 1000 tons of rolling steel in China (Liu, 1997).
Due to the adverse impact on human health and the environment,
oily sludge is designated as a hazardous waste in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRT) (Liu et al., 2011;
Ramaswamy et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2009). Hence, the disposal
of oily sludge without treatment is strictly prohibited. At present,
the conventional disposal methods include landlling (Bossert
et al., 1984; Hejazi et al., 2003), chemical extraction (Zubaidy and
Abouelnasr, 2010), incineration (Li et al., 1995; Sankaran et al.,
1998), biodegradation (Biswal et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009) and
pyrolysis (Liu et al., 2008; Schmidt and Kaminsky, 2001). Landlling
is becoming unfeasible because of the rapid depletion of available
sites and the high cost. Chemical extraction is either too costly or
only partially effective (Zubaidy and Abouelnasr, 2010). Incineration has the shortcomings of high energy consumption with
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: hanjun@wust.edu.cn (J. Han).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.030
0301-4797/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
178
Kaminsky, 2001; Shie et al., 2000), only a few reports focus on the
oily sludge from the steel industry (Houbart, 2012; Liu et al., 2013).
In fact, the components of oily sludge from steel industry are
different with those from the oil rening industry. The iron concentration in the oily sludge from iron and steel industry is relatively high. Hence, the investigation of simultaneous recycling of
energy and iron during oily sludge treatment is very interesting
(Houbart, 2012).
The aim of this study was to investigate the simultaneous recovery of energy and iron resources from oily sludge using pyrolysis
in a uidized bed reactor at a relatively low temperature
(400e600 C). Meanwhile, the effect of temperature on the distribution and composition of the pyrolysis products (non-condensable gases, oil and solid residue) was also studied.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The oily sludge used in this experiment was obtained from the
rolling steel process of an iron and steel company in Wuhan city,
China. The proximate analysis and ultimate analysis were summarized in Table 1.
The oil content of oily sludge is measured by solvent extraction,
also as Table 1. The oil extraction method was described by Zubaidy
and Abouelnasr (2010). 40 g of oily sludge were added to specied
amounts of chloroform. The mass ratio of solvent-to-sludge was
5:1. After mixing oily sludge and solvent, the sample was ltered,
dried to remove solvent, and then weighed. The ltrate was
distilled using a batch simple distillation apparatus. In addition, the
inorganic materials of the solid residues in the oily sludge are
analyzed by X-ray uorescence spectrometry (XRF).
2.2. Experimental apparatus and procedures
The oily sludge pyrolysis was carried out in a uidized bed
reactor with an internal diameter of 0.4 m and a vertical length of
1.2 m. The system consisted of a stainless steel reactor, a cooling
system for separating water and the condensable oil, and a gas
cleaning/drying system followed by gas measurement devices. The
reactor was electrically heated, and the temperature was measured
with thermocouples and controlled. The experimental temperatures were 400, 450, 500, 550, and 600 C. In order to maintain an
inert atmosphere, nitrogen was fed into the reactor at a ow rate of
1.0 L min1 for 30 min. The residence time of the gaseous products
in the reactor was about 13 s.
When the temperature of the reactor reached the pre-determined temperature, the oily sludge was continuously fed by an
injector with a feeding rate of approximately 2.0 g/min, and the
feed time was 50 min in each runs. The gases released from oily
72.72
a,b
5.20
14.96
4.05
2.07
Low heating
value/MJ Kg1
28.28
Components (W%)
Fixed carbona
Asha
Volatilea
Moisturec
Oil contentc
Solid residuec
9.35
16.67
73.98
32.64
48.06
19.30
a
b
c
Dry base.
Calculated by difference.
As received basis.
Table 2
Chemical composition of the oil extracted from the original oily sludge.
Chemical composition of the oil
Table 1
Chemical characteristics of the oily sludge.
No.
Compounds
Conc./%
No.
Compounds
Conc./%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Undecene
Undecane
Dodecene
Dodecane
Tridecylene
Tridecane
Tetradecene
Pentadecane
Naphthalene
Hexadecene
Hexadecane
Heptadecene
Pentadecanone
2.34
4.16
3.44
2.22
2.22
2.84
6.14
5.16
2.36
5.18
4.82
3.86
3.88
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Tetradecanoic acid
Heptadecane
Heptadecanone
Dibutyl phthalate
Hexadecanoic acid
Octadecenic acid
Eicosane
Docosane
Myristic acid
Hexacosane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Others
3.18
2.12
5.46
1.21
7.80
7.10
2.58
1.26
4.08
1.66
4.30
1.32
9.31
179
indicated that the oils contain about 32.44% alkanes, 23.18% alkenes, 22.16% aliphatic acid, 9.34% ketones, 2.36% aromatic hydrocarbons, and 10.52% substituted aromatics. The X-ray uorescence
spectrometry (XRF) results show that iron oxide in the solid residues of the oily sludge is as high as 42.10% (in Table 3).
3.2. Effect of temperature on the product yields
Fig. 1 shows the distribution of gas, condensed oil, solid residue
and water yields during oily sludge pyrolysis under different reaction temperatures. It can be seen that there is no signicant
variation in the gas yield when the temperature increases from 400
to 500 C. As the temperature is further increased, the gas yield
increases dramatically and reaches its maximum value (57.48 wt.%)
at 600 C. Meanwhile, the water content seems to be independent
of the reaction temperature. As for solid residue, the yield slightly
decreases with increasing the reaction temperature. It is also found
that the oil yield increases from 45.54 to 59.20 wt.% with increasing
temperature from 400 to 500 C, and then signicantly decreases
from 59.20 to 11.21 wt.% as the temperature increases from 500 to
600 C, which is consistent with other studies (Liu et al., 2008). The
vaporization of oil has not been completed when the temperature
is below 500 C. The oil contents in the solid residue pyrolyzed
under 400 and 500 C are 8.15% and 0, respectively. Hence, the
increase of gaseous products at 400e500 C was predominantly
due to the further vaporization of oil, which was proven by the
variation of the solid residue yield and oil content in the solid
residues. While the increase of the gaseous products at 500e600 C
was predominantly due to the secondary cracking or thermal
decomposition of the oils because there was a greater decrease in
oil yield (Permsubscul et al., 2007).
Table 3
Chemical components of the solid residue.
Chemical composition of the solid residue
No.
Compounds
Wt.%
No.
Compounds
Wt.%
No.
Compounds
Wt.%
1
2
3
4
5
Na2O
MgO
Al2O3
SiO2
P2O5
4.57
2.80
1.61
2.93
3.98
6
7
8
9
10
SO3
K2O
CaO
TiO2
MnO
12.02
0.67
27.64
0.21
0.28
11
12
13
14
Fe2O3
Ni2O3
CuO
ZnO
42.10
0.58
0.21
0.40
Organicsg H2 Og4CO H2
(1)
CS H2 Og4CO H2 ;
(2)
(3)
CO H2 O4CO2 H2 ;
(4)
Meanwhile, high temperatures can promote the cracking reactions of CmHn (C2H4, C2H6 and C3H8). The typical reactions are
(Zhang et al., 2011):
C2 H6 4C2 H4 H2
(5)
C2 H4 4CH4 C
(6)
180
under 400, 450, 500, 550 and 600 C were 13.47, 14.23, 15.33, 23.14
and 24.90 MJ/Nm3, respectively. Therefore, pyrolysis gas can be
used as a fuel for boiler or furnace, and it also may be reused in the
pyrolysis system as an auxiliary fuel to supply energy.
Table 5
Detail analyses of the oil obtained from the original oily sludge and pyrolysis
process.
No. Compounds
Conc. %
Original 400 C 450 C 500 C 550 C 600 C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Nonane
Cyclopentane
Decane
Dodecene
Undecane
Undecene
Dodecane
Tridecane
Tridecene
Cyclopropane
Pentadecane
Tetradecene
Tridecanoic acid
Heptadecane
Heptacosane
Eicosane
Docosane
Hexacosane
Hexadecene
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Heptadecene
Dodecanoic acid
Tetradecanoic acid
n-Hexadecanoic acid
Octadecanoic acid
Phthalic acid
Myristic acid
Pentadecanone
Hexadecanone
Heptadecanone
Tridecanone
Nonadecanone
3,4-Dihydro-3,3,9trimethyl-1(2H)acridone
35 Benzene
36 Benzenamine
37 Dibutyl phthalate
38 Naphthalene
39 Pyrene
Others (Wt.%<0.3%)
e
e
e
4.16
4.16
2.34
2.22
2.84
2.22
e
5.16
6.16
e
4.82
2.12
2.58
1.26
1.66
5.18
4.30
1.32
3.86
e
3.18
7.80
7.10
1.21
4.08
3.88
e
5.46
e
e
e
0.23
0.51
0.29
2.01
0.84
1.26
0.63
1.58
1.58
3.21
6.29
e
1.13
1.09
1.33
e
e
e
2.59
e
e
e
8.63
3.58
3.73
1.67
0.55
e
3.81
0.34
5.30
1.80
0.93
4.37
0.38
0.54
0.52
2.90
1.49
1.65
0.90
1.82
1.70
3.42
4.93
2.01
0.85
1.17
1.29
e
e
e
2.91
e
e
e
9.00
4.28
6.10
1.16
0.73
e
3.44
0.43
4.80
1.88
0.90
4.08
0.17
1.32
0.61
2.92
1.17
2.37
0.99
1.91
2.51
4.78
4.42
2.99
1.85
2.11
1.14
e
e
e
3.15
e
e
e
6.28
5.25
8.68
0.81
0.82
e
3.04
e
4.15
1.73
1.03
3.88
e
0.85
0.85
5.17
1.27
2.96
0.66
2.55
3.46
5.84
5.48
2.02
1.00
1.24
0.78
e
e
e
3.79
e
e
e
5.96
3.54
3.42
2.01
4.43
e
1.94
e
2.91
0.64
0.92
1.77
0.32
0.15
e
4.99
0.77
2.68
0.65
2.97
3.55
6.11
7.11
2.63
0.34
0.80
1.36
e
e
e
5.07
e
e
e
4.86
2.06
2.11
2.73
6.73
e
3.72
0.28
5.75
1.74
0.82
4.49
e
e
e
2.36
e
9.31
12.44
2.90
3.02
e
e
22.36
7.30
2.14
1.98
e
e
23.3
1.16
1.98
1.41
2.13
e
22.61
11.89
1.43
7.16
3.06
e
11.00
0.85
0.74
9.98
3.36
0.66
9.62
Alkane
Alkenes
Arboxylic acids
Ketones
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Table 6
The elemental analysis and lower heating value of the pyrolysis oil.
Temp/ C
Conc. %
Original
400 C
450 C
500 C
550 C
600 C
32.44
23.18
22.16
9.34
2.36
16.00
7.44
19.29
16.55
18.36
16.46
11.17
22.12
15.53
11.42
18.62
14.57
23.69
13.83
6.68
19.52
17.40
20.36
8.18
23.54
20.24
18.92
18.83
16.80
15.59
400
450
500
550
600
Elemental analysis/%
O(diff.)
68.72
71.44
72.19
70.69
67.47
11.20
10.82
13.69
13.07
14.14
14.46
12.01
11.14
10.64
12.94
4.75
4.65
4.08
4.53
4.43
0.87
1.08
0.90
1.07
1.02
34.46
35.84
36.79
36.40
34.59
400
450
500
550
600
O(diff.)
42.72
38.44
31.19
31.69
31.47
4.20
3.82
3.19
3.07
3.14
44.26
47.91
55.64
55.49
55.74
4.75
4.65
4.78
4.58
4.63
4.07
4.18
4.20
4.17
4.02
Low heating
value (MJ/kg)
Oil content/%
13.71
7.69
7.14
7.02
7.11
8.15
0.78
0
0
0
181
The effect of the pyrolysis temperature on the energy distribution of the products obtained from oily sludge pyrolysis is presented in Table 8. It can be seen that the energy fraction of the
pyrolysis oils increases slightly when the temperature increases
182
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (50806053) and Foundation of State Key
Laboratory of Coal Combustion (FSKLCC1113).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.030.
References
Fig. 4. XRF analyses of the residues at different temperatures.
Table 8
Mass and energy distribution of the products.
Energy balance
Reaction
400
450
500
550
600
temperature/ C
Energy distribution Energy fraction 41.82 49.27 58.78 27.20 10.02
of the products of oil/%
Energy fraction 14.76 17.11 19.87 42.00 61.64
of gaseous/%
Energy fraction 11.42
3.84
2.34
2.78
2.13
of residue/%
Fraction of
32.01 29.77 19.00 21.02 26.21
energy loss/%
Biswal, B.K., Tiwari, S.N., Mukherji, S., 2009. Biodegradation of oil in oily sludges
from steel mills. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1700e1703.
Bossert, I., Kachel, W.M., Bartha, R., 1984. Fate of hydrocarbons during oily sludge
disposal in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 763e767.
Hejazi, R.F., Husain, T., Khan, F.I., 2003. Landfarming operation of oily sludge in arid
regiondhuman health risk assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 99, 287e302.
Houbart, M., 2012. Erection of a Demonstrative De-oiling Plant for Recycling Oily
Steelmaking Sludge and Mill Scales. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/
project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseactionsearch.dspPage&n_proj_
id4185&docTypepdf.
2
Karamalidis, A.K., Voudrias, E.A., 2007. Release of Zn, Ni, Cu, SO2
4 and CrO4 as a
function of pH from cement-based stabilized/solidied renery oily sludge and
ash from incineration of oily sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 141, 591e606.
Karayildirim, T., Yanik, J., Yuksel, M., Bockhorn, H., 2006. Characterisation of products from pyrolysis of waste sludges. Fuel 85, 1498e1508.
Leung, D.Y.C., Yin, X.L., Zhao, Z.L., Xu, B.Y., Chen, Y., 2002. Pyrolysis of tire powder:
inuence of operation variables on the composition and yields of gaseous
product. Fuel Process. Technol. 79, 141e155.
Li, C.-T., Lee, W.-J., Mi, H.-H., Su, C.-C., 1995. PAH emission from the incineration of
waste oily sludge and PE plastic mixtures. Sci. Total Environ. 170, 171e183.
Liu, B., Zhang, S.-G., Tian, J.-J., Pan, D.-A., Liu, Y., Volinsky, A., 2013. Recycle of
valuable products from oily cold rolling mill sludge. Int. J. Min. Metall. Mater.
20, 941e946.
Liu, J., Jiang, X., Han, X., 2011. Devolatilization of oil sludge in a lab-scale bubbling
uidized bed. J. Hazard. Mater. 185, 1205e1213.
Liu, J., Song, W., Nie, Y., 2008. Effects of temperature on pyrolysis products of oil
sludge. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2, 8e14.
Liu, W., Luo, Y., Teng, Y., Li, Z., Christie, P., 2009. Prepared bed bioremediation of oily
sludge in an oileld in northern China. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 479e484.
Liu, X., 1997. Study of centrifugal treatment methods for sewage containing oil from
hot continuous rolling mill trains. Met. Power 14e17.
Midilli, A., Dogru, M., Akay, G., Howarth, C.R., 2002. Hydrogen production from
sewage sludge via a xed bed gasier product gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 27,
1035e1041.
Permsubscul, A., Vitidsant, T., Damronglerd, S., 2007. Catalytic cracking reaction of
used lubricating oil to liquid fuels catalyzed by sulfated zirconia. Korean J.
Chem. Eng. 24, 37e43.
Ramaswamy, B., Kar, D.D., De, S., 2007. A study on recovery of oil from sludge
containing oil using froth otation. J. Environ. Manag. 85, 150e154.
Sankaran, S., Pandey, S., Sumathy, K., 1998. Experimental investigation on waste
heat recovery by renery oil sludge incineration using uidised-bed technique.
J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 33, 829e845.
Schmidt, H., Kaminsky, W., 2001. Pyrolysis of oil sludge in a uidised bed reactor.
Chemosphere 45, 285e290.
Shie, J.-L., Chang, C.-Y., Lin, J.-P., Wu, C.-H., Lee, D.-J., 2000. Resources recovery of oil
sludge by pyrolysis: kinetics study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 75, 443e450.
Wang, Z., Guo, Q., Liu, X., Cao, C., 2007. Low temperature pyrolysis characteristics of
oil sludge under various heating conditions. Energy Fuels 21, 957e962.
Yao, H., Naruse, I., 2009. Behavior of lead compounds during municipal solid waste
incineration. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32, 2685e2691.
Zhang, B., Xiong, S., Xiao, B., Yu, D., Jia, X., 2011. Mechanism of wet sewage sludge
pyrolysis in a tubular furnace. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36, 355e363.
Zhou, L., Jiang, X., Liu, J., 2009. Characteristics of oily sludge combustion in circulating uidized beds. J. Hazard. Mater. 170, 175e179.
Zubaidy, E.A.H., Abouelnasr, D.M., 2010. Fuel recovery from waste oily sludge using
solvent extraction. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 88, 318e326.