Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thought Paper 2
Thought Paper 2
Mainlanders do not come to give birth in Hong Kong, I will be very relieved now (Sharon, 2012).
When the interests of two groups clash due to scarce resource competition (hospital beds),
frustration of Hong Kongers is inflicted, resulting in more prejudice towards Mainlanders.
1.3 Competition for Infant Milk Powder
As a lot of Mainland parents lose faith in local infant milk powder due to its low quality, many of
them came to Hong Kong to purchase infant formula which made a nuisance to parents in Hong
Kong as infant milk powder was always sold out. They complained about the constant shortage
of milk powder and blamed Mainlanders for this as they purchased it in bulk. Competition of
milk powder (scarce resource) is another source of frustration which leads to prejudice and
even hostility. Thus, Hong Kong people hold a more prejudiced attitude towards Mainlanders.
As Mainlanders are perceived as resource-grasping enemies who compete for scarce resources
with Hong Kongers in preschool places, hospital beds and even infant milk powder, prejudice is
formed towards Mainlanders. Apart from this, social identity theory can be applied in Hong
Kong-Mainland conflict as illustrated below:
2. Social Identity Theory
Hong Kongers often label Mainlanders as rude and inferior while regarding themselves as
civilized and superior. This is because Hong Kongers gain pride for their in-group according to
the social identity theory. People do not only possess personal identity, but also social identity.
Their social identity which defines who I am is formed from group membership (Hogg, 2006).
Due to the unique historical and political background, Hong Kong citizens possess Hong
Kongers identity and construct their own territory consciousness. Under self-categorization,
they seek an in-group which shares the same social identity and characteristics (Stets & Burke,
2000). Thus, they categorize themselves as Hong Kongers while people born in Mainland
China as Mainlanders. They then identify themselves with a group as one of the members (ingroup) in order to gain self-esteem. In this case, Hong Kongers are regarded as in-group while
Mainlanders are regarded as out-groups which are distinctively different from them.
Afterwards, in-group members enhance their self-esteem by making comparison with outgroups. People hold in-group bias so they think favorably for their own group. This breeds
favoritism so members of in-group perceive we better than they. In this case, though there is
a minority of Mainlanders who behave impolitely, Hong Kong people, much affected by ingroup bias, still tend to think that all of Mainlanders are rude and impolite while Hong Kongers
are more courteous and civic conscious. Moreover, Hong Kongers often attribute unfavorable
behavior such as spitting in public areas, speaking loudly and jumping the queue to Mainlanders
while attributing favorable deeds to themselves such as giving seats to the elderly and being
obedient in order to gain higher self-esteem due to in-group bias. All these demonstrate how
social identity theory can be applied in Hong Kong-Mainland conflict.
All in all, according to the group realistic conflict theory, Hong Kongers have prejudice towards
Mainlanders because they compete for resources in various aspects including preschool places,
hospital beds and even infant milk powder. Social identity theory can also be applied in Hong
Kong-Mainland conflict.
Reference List:
Hogg, Michael. (2006). Contemporary social psychological theories. New York: Stanford
University Press, 2006.
Jackson, Jay W. (1993). Realistic Group Conflict Theory: A Review and Evaluation of the
Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Psychological Record, 43, No.3, 395415.
Li, Sandy. (30 October, 2013). Mainland Parents Push Rents Near Border Higher. South China
Morning Post.
Nelson, T. D. (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Sharon, Lafraniere. (22 February, 2012). Mainland Chinese Flock to Hong Kong to Give Birth.
The New York Times.
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and
Oppression. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Stets, Jane & Burke, Peter J. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social
Psychology Journal, 63, No.3, 224-237.
Zhao, Shirley. (29 October, 2013). Feeling the Pressure amid Kindergarten Chaos. South China
Morning Post.