Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW
doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00049.x
ABSTRACT
New Australian guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis were published in July 2008. The guidelines were
revised by a multidisciplinary group to reflect recent changes in international recommendations regarding antibiotic
prophylaxis for infective endocarditis. The reasons for the changes are explored in this review and the implications for
dental practice are discussed.
Key words: Infective endocarditis, antibiotic prophylaxis, guidelines.
Abbreviations and acronyms: AHA = American Heart Association; IE = infective endocarditis; NICE = National Institute for Health and
Clinical Excellence; RHD = rheumatic heart disease.
(Accepted for publication 26 May 2008.)
or chronic. It was considered that prophylactic antibiotics would destroy bacteria in the bloodstream so
that bacterial endocarditis would be prevented. For half
a century, between 1955 and 2006, the alterations to
antibiotic guidelines in various countries related mainly
to antibiotic choice and route of administration. The
use of intramuscular injections or intravenous infusions
of antibiotics such as penicillin, vancomycin, gentamicin and erythromycin was gradually replaced with an
oral route of administration, with a single dose of
amoxycillin or clindamycin given prior to treatment.
The recommendation for post-treatment antibiotic
administration was abolished by the AHA in 1997.5
The first guidelines to recommend a major departure
from the traditional belief that all patients at risk of IE
required antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental or other
invasive procedures were produced by a working party
of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
in 2006.6 The British guidelines reduced the number of
cardiac conditions requiring antibiotic prophylaxis
to only those individuals with previous IE, those
who had undergone cardiac valve replacement surgery
2008 Australian Dental Association
CG Daly et al.
Table 1. Cardiac conditions associated with the
highest risk of adverse outcomes from endocarditis
Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in patients with the
following cardiac conditions if undergoing a specified dental
procedure (see Tables 2 and 3):
prosthetic cardiac valve or prosthetic material used for cardiac
valve repair
previous infective endocarditis
congenital heart disease but only if it involves:
unrepaired cyanotic defects, including palliative shunts and
conduits
completely repaired defects with prosthetic material or devices,
whether placed by surgery or catheter intervention, during the
first 6 months after the procedure (after which the prosthetic
material is likely to have been endothelialized)
repaired defects with residual defects at or adjacent to the site of
a prosthetic patch or device (which inhibit endothelialization)
cardiac transplantation with the subsequent development of
cardiac valvulopathy
rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous Australians only
the Australian experience of IE has been well documented11 and dental issues associated with IE have been
investigated.12,13 The UK guidelines3 were carefully
considered but it was decided that the abolition of
antibiotic prophylaxis for all patients at risk of IE could
not be supported at this time. Instead, the American
guidelines2 were adopted with one important modification to the cardiac conditions requiring prophylaxis
(Table 1). Although the incidence of rheumatic heart
disease (RHD) is low in developed countries and it is
not considered a cardiac condition at high risk of an
adverse outcome from IE in the American guidelines,
there is still a high incidence of RHD among Indigenous
Australians and the adverse outcomes of IE in this
group are considered significant.14 Therefore, it was the
consensus of the expert group that antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary in this particular group. As with
the American2 and British guidelines,6 mitral valve
prolapse with or without significant regurgitation
and RHD in non-Indigenous Australians have been
removed from the list of cardiac conditions requiring
antibiotic prophylaxis.
An important difference between the Australian and
American guidelines is the description of dental procedures requiring antibiotic prophylaxis. In the American
guidelines, the dental procedures for which IE prophylaxis is recommended are: Dental procedures that
involve manipulation of gingival tissue or the periapical
region of teeth or perforation of the oral mucosa.2
Manipulation of gingival tissue is a confusing
description and therefore the new Australian guidelines
have sought to identify which dental procedures are
likely to have a high incidence of bacteraemia (may
occur in 70 per cent or more of cases). The dental highrisk treatments for which antibiotic prophylaxis should
be given, for those patients with specified cardiac
conditions (Table 1), are listed in Table 2. Consideration was given to deleting the moderate risk group of
198
oral examination
infiltration and block local anaesthetic injection
restorative dentistry
supragingival rubber dam clamping and placement of rubber dam
intracanal endodontic procedures
removal of sutures
impressions and construction of dentures
orthodontic bracket placement and adjustment of fixed appliances
application of gels
intraoral radiographs
supragingival plaque removal
2008 Australian Dental Association
CG Daly et al.
prophylaxis for dental treatment. Aust Dent J 2005;50(Suppl 2):
S69S73.
13. Singh J, Straznicky I, Avent M, Goss AN. Antibiotic prophylaxis
for endocarditis: time to reconsider. Aust Dent J 2005;50(Suppl
2):S60S68.
14. Moulds RF, Jeyasingham MS. Antibiotic prophylaxis against
endocarditis: time for a rethink. MJA 2008 (in press).
15. Daly CG, Mitchell DH, Highfield JE, Grossberg DE, Stewart D.
Bacteremia due to periodontal probing: a clinical and microbiologic investigation. J Periodontol 2001;72:210214.
16. Duval X, Leport C. Prophylaxis of infective endocarditis:
current tendencies, continuing controversies. Lancet Infect Dis
2008;8:225232.
17. Roberts GJ. Dentists are innocent! Everyday bacteraemia is the
real culprit: a review and assessment of the evidence that dental
surgical procedures are the principal cause of infective endocarditis in children. Paediatr Cardiol 1999;20:317325.
18. Brett AS. The new endocarditis guideline: which dental procedures merit prophylaxis? Journal Watch General Medicine. 28
February 2008.
19. Daly CG. Antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis.
Protecting the patient or the dentist? Periodontology 1995;16:
3240.
*The new Australian guidelines are available free-of-charge on the Therapeutic Guidelines Limited website,
http://www.tg.com.au, and also in their electronic publications (eTG complete and miniTG). The booklet versions of
Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic and Therapeutic Guidelines: Oral and Dental will be updated as the new editions
are published.
200