Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Outline
Table of Contents
1
Unit Standards:............................................................................................................................................... 4
10
11
12
13
13.1
13.2
13.3
14
14.1
14.2
14.3
15
16
17
18
19
19.1
20
20.1
Welcome to this post graduate paper; as a student at this level you will be looking to develop not
only your knowledge, but you critical analysis and appraisal skills. Your lecturer will be Ian Guy; Ian
has over 30 years experience within the Health Sector and Higher Education in the United Kingdom
and New Zealand.
Many students on this course are from different professional backgrounds; your personal
experiences and reflections on working within the health systems are encouraged to be shared.
These will form a valuable part of your learning process. For many parts of the content there will be
no right or wrong answer; the health system goes through continual change driven by factors
external to the system. This paper endeavours to equip you to drive that change.
During this course it is likely you will be introduced to new ideas and different ways of thinking
about the health sector. It is highly recommended that if you do not understand these concepts that
you seek clarity for your lecturer at the earliest opportunity.
2
Students will investigate leadership in the health care sector from theoretical, historical and
functional perspectives with a view to enhancing their understanding of the impact of leadership
ability. Students will identify and synthesize personal leadership understandings and skills. The utility
of research to support leadership in the health care sector is evaluated.
In plain English what does this mean? This course aims to develop your knowledge and
understanding regarding the key principles used within the health sector in New Zealand. You will
achieve this by reflecting on your experiences to date, by studying selected leadership approaches
and research on effective leadership.
3
Unit Standards:
Ian Guy
9
Time
Venue
No class
9 11am
L203
10 11am (Lecture)
L204
L204
L204
60
0
90
150
Length (Hrs.):
Te Roa (Hora)
References:
Ng Apiti Motuhake
Powhiri
Refer to e-campus
Introduction
Health Care System Aotearoa
Refer to e-campus
Database searching
Refer to e-campus
Treaty of Waitangi/Mori
Health Concepts
Refer to e-campus
Refer to e-campus
Leadership in healthcare
Refer to e-campus
Refer to e-campus
Tutorial
Refer to e-campus
10
Refer to e-campus
11
Refer to e-campus
12
Working in teams
Refer to e-campus
13
Refer to e-campus
14
Refer to e-campus
15
Refer to e-campus
16
Tutorial
Refer to e-campus
Refer to e-campus
7
(24/08/15)
14
(02/11/15)
Assessment Type:
Mm Aromatawai
Learning Outcomes
Assessed:
Hua Ako
Percentage
Weighting:
ta
Whakro
Summative Essay
1, 2 & 3
50%
Summative Report
4&5
50%
HLTH.8001
No Mark
Low Mark
Critically
examines the
historical
development
of healthcare
leadership in
New Zealand
Clearly
identifies a
professional
group, and
the
development
of that group.
Critically
discuss the
leadership
structures
within that
profession
Analyses and
evaluates 3
leadership
theories or
frameworks
Critically
discusses the
potential
application of
one of these
theories or
frameworks
to an aspect
of
contemporary
healthcare
Provides a
rationale to
support the
choice of
theory or
framework
References
and Citations
10%
Provides an adequate
critical examination of
the historical
development of
healthcare leadership
in the NZ context
Provides an in depth
critical examination of the
historical development of
healthcare leadership.
Clear analysis given.
Linked to the NZ context
15%
No professional group
identified.
Does not discuss the
development
No discussion of the
leadership structure
within that profession
A professional group
identified
Adequate discussion of
the development and
leadership structure
within that profession
Demonstrates a
satisfactory
understanding of the
profession
A professional group
identified,
In depth critical discussion
of the development of
that group and critical
discussion of the
leadership structure
evident within that
profession
24%
No evidence of analysis
and evaluation of 3
leadership theories or
frameworks
Adequate evidence of
analysis and evaluation of
3 leadership theories or
frameworks
In depth evidence of
analysis and evaluation of
all 3 leadership theories
or frameworks
15%
No evidence of critical
discussion of the
potential application of
one of these theories or
frameworks to an aspect
of contemporary
healthcare
Inadequate or minimal
evidence of analysis
and evaluation of 3 or
less leadership theories
or frameworks
Minimal evidence of
critical discussion of the
potential application of
one of these theories or
frameworks to an
aspect of contemporary
healthcare
Adequate evidence of
critical discussion of the
potential application of
one of these theories or
frameworks to an aspect
of contemporary
healthcare
In depth evidence of
critical discussion of the
potential application of
one of these theories or
frameworks to an aspect
of contemporary
healthcare
6%
No rationale given to
support the choice of
theory or framework
given
10%
Integration of
Literature
10%
Little evidence of
integration
Plagiarism evident
Few citations.
Attempt to integrate
literature. Over reliance
on 1 or 2 sources
and/or
non scholarly sources.
Limited paraphrasing.
Good attempt to
integrate literature.
Effort to paraphrase.
Citations mainly from
scholarly sources.
Essay Format
3%
No introduction or
conclusion
No obvious structure in
body.
Introduction outlines
topic & main ideas
Paragraphs have topic
sentences but are not
linked and/or in a logical
order. Conclusion
summarises key points.
Introduction outlines
topic, and main ideas
Paragraphs have topic
sentences, linked and in a
logical sequence.
Conclusion summarises
key points
Limited introduction
and/or conclusion
Body paragraphs lack
topic sentences, linking
and/or logical order.
Medium Mark
High Mark
Academic
Writing
Standards
4%
Minimal errors in
grammar and spelling.
Word count within limits.
Presentation
3%
No requirements met
Some requirements
met
HLTH.8001
No Mark
Low Mark
High Mark
Identifies and
critically analyses
the knowledge,
skills, attitudes and
values required to
be an effective
leader
25%
Minimal
identification and
critically analysis of
the knowledge,
skills, attitudes and
values to be an
effective leader.
May omit 1 or
more of the
requirements.
Adequate
identification and
critically analysis of
the knowledge,
skills, attitudes and
values to be an
effective leader. All
requirements
covered
In depth identification
and critically analysis of
the knowledge, skills,
attitudes and values to
be an effective leader.
All requirements
covered with examples
given.
Discusses the
potential
consequences of
poor leadership
being
demonstrated by
the Team Leader
15%
No discussion of
the potential
consequences of
poor leadership
being
demonstrated by
the Team Leader
Minimal discussion
of the potential
consequences of
poor leadership
being
demonstrated by
the Team Leader
Adequate discussion
of the potential
consequences of
poor leadership
being demonstrated
by the Team Leader
In depth discussion of
the potential
consequences of poor
leadership being
demonstrated by the
Team Leader
15%
In an in depth manner
links the impact that
poor leadership by the
Team Leader has on
staff, patients/clients
and the organisation.
All requirements met
15%
Minimal discussion
of how the use of a
leadership analysis
tool can be used to
critically evaluate
you own
leadership style
and those of other
members of the
healthcare team
Adequate discussion
how the use of a
leadership analysis
tool can be used to
critically evaluate
you own leadership
style and those of
other members of
the healthcare team
In depth discussion of
how the use of a
leadership analysis tool
can be used to critically
evaluate you own
leadership style and
those of other
members of the
healthcare team
References and
Citations
10%
Does not
discusses how
the use of a
leadership
analysis tool can
be used to
critically evaluate
you own
leadership style
and those of
other members
of the healthcare
team
APA format not
used /minimal
Reference list
incomplete.
Integration of
Literature
10%
Little evidence of
integration
Plagiarism
evident.
Few citations.
Attempt to
integrate
literature. Over
reliance on 1 or 2
sources and/or
non scholarly
sources.
Limited
paraphrasing.
Good attempt to
integrate literature.
Effort to paraphrase.
Citations mainly
from scholarly
sources.
Literature well
integrated good use of
paraphrasing Citations
acknowledged and
from scholarly sources.
Report Format
3%
Report format
not evident
4%
Many grammar
and /or spelling
errors
Well under or
over word limit.
3%
No requirements
met
Academic Writing
Standards
Presentation
Some evidence of a
report format being
used but not
consistently
Grammar and
spelling errors
Significant
variation from
word limit.
Minimal errors in
grammar and
spelling.
Word count within
limits.
Some
requirements met
Most requirements
met