Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by the
central
FIG. 1 - Bathymetry and place names in the Panama Basin. Contours in meters (not corrected for
variations in sound velocity in sea water) are derived from van Andel et al. (1971, Fig. 2) and were
selected to bring out principal topographic features. They are repeated without labels on following
figures.
435
436
FIG. 2 - Location of samples. Numbers are accession numbers in the OSU marine sediment
laboratory. Large dots represent samples used in Figs. 3-5. Contours from Fig. 1.
437
FIG. 3 - Derivation of component modes. Dots indicate points of cumulative curve determined by
falling drop technique. Heavy solid line is cumulative size distribution determined by fitting cubic spline
curve to data, thin solid line is size-frequency curve obtained by differentiation of cumulative curve.
Dashed lines represent component modes determined by DuPont Curve Resolver (labeled as defined
in text). Note tail modes on fine side of upper curve and coarse side of lower curve. Mode f in PL 031
probably represents a clay mode extending into the silt domain; converted to percentage of total
sample it would add 11% to 47% clay fraction. Tail mode a of PS 131 is probably an artifact due to
curve processing; it would only add 1% to the sand fraction of 24%. Peaks of modes C (PL 031) and
D and E (PS 131) are displaced with respect to apparent peak positions in respective frequency
curves indicating that visual estimation of peak positions is hazardous. Note further that a broad mode
(C in PS 131) depresses peak height and decreases modal area of modes on its banks below what
visual inspection might suggest. A double mode, E-E', is present in PS 131; the question may be
raised whether the D-E-E' cluster is real or a result of inaccurate data or of a deviation of the component modes from a normal distribution; the majority of the Panama Basin samples have well
separated modes such as shown in Fig. 5.
438
439
FIG. 4 - Tail modes. Solid line is size-frequency distribution; dashed line represents component
modes. Small tail modes in center graph may be due to edge effects resulting from data processing or
may represent small deviations of the adjacent modes from a true normal distribution. The large tail
modes of the upper and lower graphs probably represent portions of sand and clay modes,
respectively, intruding into the silt domain. Note small modes B (upper graph) and C (middle graph).
These are required to fill shoulders on the C and D modes, respectively; although labeled as real
modes, they may represent deviations of the large modes from a true normal distribution. Tick marks
along base indicate class boundaries used in falling drop analysis.
440
FIG. 5 - Examples of size-frequency distributions and their component modes in the Panama Basin.
Letters indicate mode groups discussed in text. Note large tail modes (a) in PL 017 and PS 124; they
are probably part of a sand mode. They add 5% and 6%, respectively, to sand fractions of 87% and
11%. A small mode (B) is needed in PS 130 to account for the asymmetry of mode C and a small
mode A in PL 017 to fill slight asymmetry in tail mode a. Both may be due to small deviations of the
main modes from a true normal distribution. Mode D in PS 124 demonstrates the effect of broad
adjacent modes in reducing peak height and area below what is visually apparent. Tick marks along
base indicate class boundaries used in falling drop analysis.
441
FIG. 6 - Histogram of number of cases in each 0.05 modal class plotted against grain size. The
histogram has been divided into clusters at minima in the number of cases and clusters have been
shown alternatingly with broken and solid bars erected in each 0.05 interval. Modes assigned to
two clusters in one interval are shown with two bars of different signature. Total number of cases 103.
Triangles at base indicate class boundaries used in falling drop analysis. Cluster boundaries appear
not to be directly related to these boundaries.
positions for each cluster are listed in table 1.
The spread of each cluster is probably largely
due to uncertainties in the determination of the
peak of each component mode as a result of
wide spacing of size class boundaries.
However, the spread may be in part a function
of a natural variation in peak position. Clearly,
a technique yielding continuous size
distributions would provide more certainly that
the component modes do not form a
continuous series.
A few component modes occur in
transition zones between clusters (table 1,
lower part); these were assigned to clusters by
a somewhat subjective process. If the mode
was a minor shoulder or subsidiary peak on a
larger one, it was assigned to the same
cluster; if it was clearly independent, it was
assigned to whichever cluster on the left or
right was unoccupied in the sample. In a very
few cases, the decision was influenced by the
logic of the resulting map pattern.
442
443
FIG. 7 - Distribution of sand fraction (coarser than 4.0 , 0.062 mm) in Panama Basin. Contours in
percentage of total sediment. Black dots are sample locations, thin depth contours refer to Fig. 1.
Sample numbers and locations in Fig. 2.
444
FIG. 8 - Distribution of clay fraction (finer than 9.0 ; 0.002 mm) in the Panama Basin. Contours in
percentage of total sediment. Black dots are sample locations (Fig. 2); thin depth contours from Fig. 1.
445
To some extent, mode E (Fig. 14) represents the extreme of this trend, with zones of
high concentration along the foot of the
Carnegie and Cocos Ridge slopes. More
important, however, is a new pattern not
observed in the coarser modes. This pattern
consists of large concentrations in the northern
parts of the eastern and western basins
connected through the Coiba gap, and with
tongues extending southwestward into the
western basin and through the MalpeloCarnegie
saddle.
Another
zone
of
concentration occurs along the southeastern
continental margin. This new pattern
FIG. 9 - Distribution of silt fraction (4.0 - 9.0 ; 0.062 - 0.002 mm) in the Panama Basin. Contours
in percentage of total sediment. Black dots are sample locations (Fig. 2); thin depth contours from Fig.
1.
446
FIG. 10 - Distribution of modal groups A and a. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Black dots
are sample locations, larger if mode a is present (sample numbers and locations in Fig. 2); thin depth
contours from Fig. 1. See table 1.
447
FIG. 11 - Distribution of modal group B. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Black dots are
sample locations (Fig. 2); thin depth contours from Fig. 1. See table 1.
448
FIG. 12 - Distribution of modal group C. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Black dots are
sample locations (Fig. 2); thin depth contours from Fig. 1. See table 1.
449
FIG. 13 - Distribution of modal group D. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Black dots are
sample locations. Thin depth contours from Fig. 1. See table 1.
450
FIG. 14 - Distribution of modal group E. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Thin depth
contours from Fig. 1. Black dots are sample locations. See table 1.
451
FIG. 15 - Distribution of modal group F. Contours in percentage of total silt fraction. Black dots are
sample locations. Thin depth contours from Fig. 1. See table 1.
452
FIG. 16 - Schematic representation of dispersal of clay and fine silt in Panama Basin (modes F, E in
part). Isopleths from Figs. 8, 14, 15. Solid arrows indicate dispersal system of land-derived material
and follow deepest part of basin below 3,200 m; dashed arrows indicate dispersal of material derived
from winnowing on ridge crests.
453
FIG. 17 - Schematic representation of dispersal of coarse and medium silt in Panama Basin. Isopleths
from Figs. 10-13. Distribution of mode groups E and B shown in part only. Arrows indicate dispersal
directions based on textural patterns and existing knowledge regarding current patterns and erosion
channels.
454
FIG. 18 - Histogram of average textural composition of sets of samples from open Pacific Ocean
(labeled "pelagic") and from western Panama Basin.
455
456