Professional Documents
Culture Documents
37 (2006)
No 5
1. Introduction
The development of the theory of Brownian motion played a pivotal role
and continues to do so in the development of statistical mechanics
and thermodynamics [1, 2]. Thermodynamics together with relativity and
quantum theory form three pillars on which much of the entire structure
of physics rests. Tampering with the axioms in either of those theories is
not a good idea; doing so may well lead to contradictions with the other
theories. In particular, the field of thermodynamics bears consequences for
many branches of physics. Its four laws are well-known [3,4]: the zeroth law
(1537)
1538
guarantees that states of thermal equilibrium exist which can be characterized by a temperature T . The first law provides a balance among the various
contributions that make up the internal energy of a system while the second
law introduces the concept of thermodynamic entropy S, which notably is
extensive and never decreases for a closed physical system. In addition, the
second law tells us that there exists an absolute zero of temperature.
The Third Law is attributed to Walther Hermann Nernst (18641941)
and arose as the result of his seminal idea being guided by his critical
analysis of chemical and electrochemical reactions at lower temperatures
that at low temperatures there occurs for isothermal processes a perfect
correspondence between the enthalpy and the Gibbs free energy. Thereby,
the approximate rule hypothesized earlier by Marcelin Berthelot and Julius
Thomson, becomes a law at zero temperature. Nernst announced this
result already in his lectures in 1905, terming it mein Wrmesatz (my law
of heat) [5,6]. He took this result even further: He also studied how fast the
difference between the changes in the enthalpy H and the Gibbs free energy
G, i.e. H G tends to zero [7]. In fact, this difference vanishes faster
than linear in temperature implying that the change of entropy itself must
vanish at absolute zero. This in turn implies identical, generally vanishing
initial slopes for the corresponding quantities H and G as a function of
temperature. An elucidating account of the history of the Third Law and
the controversies surrounding its acceptance is presented in the books by
Dugdale [8] and by Wilks [9]. In its strict form, as given by Max Planck [10],
the Third Law reads: The entropy s = S/N per particle approaches at
absolute zero a constant value s0 that possibly depends on the chemical
composition of the system. This limiting entropy constant s0 can generally
be set equal to zero.
The Third Law carries prominent consequences for quantum mechanics
and the field of low-temperature physics. First, the fact that at absolute
zero temperature the isotherm coincides with the isentrope (adiabat) immediately implies that this absolute zero temperature is unattainable by use of
a sequence of isothermal and adiabatic reversible operations [11]. Therefore,
it has the consequence that the efficiency of a Carnot engine, i.e. a heat
engine that cyclically operates between two heat baths of different temperatures which are never brought into contact with each other, can never reach
100% for any finite upper temperature. Moreover, the constant value of
the entropy at absolute zero is given by the degeneracy g of the N -particle
system in the corresponding quantum ground state, i.e. S(T = 0) = kB ln g,
where kB is the Boltzmann constant. The limiting value of the intensive
quantity s0 = S(T = 0)/N in the thermodynamic limit of particle number
N will typically be zero, so long as the degeneracy g = g(N ) does
not grow with N faster than exponentially [12]. A well-known exception is
1539
1540
p2
1
+ f x2 .
2M
2
(1)
eEn =
n=0
1
,
2 sinh [~0 /2]
(2)
ln(Z)
~0
~0
=
+
2
exp(~0 ) 1
E =
(3)
ln(Z)
S = kB ln(Z)
~0
ln 1 exp(~0 ) .
= kB
exp(~0 ) 1
1541
(4)
(5)
E
E
= kB 2
T
(6)
S
S
=
.
T
(7)
or from (4) as
C=T
~0
2 sinh(~0 /2)
2
(8)
(9)
~0
kB T
2
~0
exp
kB T
1542
(11)
(12)
i=1
X
X
ci xi + q 2
HSB = q
c2i
.
(13)
2mi i2
i=1
We note that quantum systems that are coupled to an environment of
finite strength are rarely exactly solvable. The dissipative quantum oscillator
becomes exactly solvable with its bilinear coupling to a bath because of the
inherent quadratic structure of the total Hamiltonian in (11). This fact holds
true even for the case of time-dependent, parametrically driven dissipative
quantum harmonic systems [26, 27].
In order to describe the influence of the environment on the system
oscillator, it is sufficient to know the spectral density of bath oscillators
defined by [13, 15, 16, 19]
c2i
( i ) .
(14)
2mi i
i=1
For later purposes, we introduce the Laplace transform of the damping
kernel, which generally depends on frequency, thereby causing memoryfriction [28, 29], i.e.,
Z
d J() 2z
1
.
(15)
(z) =
M
2 + z2
J() =
1543
hOS i =
Tr [OS exp(H)]
.
Tr [exp(H)]
(17)
For ohmic damping, the second moments of position and momentum can be
expressed as [15, 30, 31]
~
f0 (T )
(18)
hq 2 i =
M
and
hp2 i = M ~f2 (T ) ,
(19)
where we have introduced a temperature-dependent function
fn (T ) =
+
Z
d
n+1
coth
2 ( 2 02 )2 + 2 2
~
2
(20)
For n = 2, i.e. when evaluating hp2 i, the integrand decreases only with 1/
and a finite value can only be obtained by introducing a high-frequency cutoff
in the damping kernel (z). However, this divergent term gives rise only to
a temperature-independent contribution to hp2 i and thus to the energy (16).
When evaluating the specific heat according to (6), this constant term will
disappear and a finite result is obtained even for ohmic damping. After some
algebra, one finds for the specific heat
C
~
+ 2+ (1 + + ) + 2 (1 + ) ,
=1
kB
2
where
s
2
~0
=
1
2
20
20
(21)
(22)
1544
and (z) is the trigamma function. At low temperatures, the specific heat
thus assumes the form
"
2 #
kB T 3
kB T
4 3
C
+ O(T 5 ) .
(23)
=
+
3
kB
3 0 ~0
15 0
0
~0
This result differs significantly from the expression (9) in the absence of
dissipation. While in the latter case, the presence of an energy gap led to an
exponential suppression of the specific heat, we now find a linear increase
with temperature. This behavior indicates the existence of a finite density
of states even at small excitation energies [32]. Even at high temperatures
the effect of dissipation can be detected, albeit in a less spectacular manner.
The leading correction in the high-temperature expansion reads
C
~
~2 ( 2 202 )
=1
+
+ O(T 3 ) .
kB
2kB T
24(kB T )2
(24)
Thus, the leading correction depends on the damping strength . This finding is in clear contrast to the behavior of the quantum escape rate [16, 29]:
There, the leading quantum correction to the escape rate always enhances
the classical result and is independent of the dissipation strength.
3.3. Energy versus partition function for a damped harmonic oscillator
Another prescription to obtain the specific heat starts out from the
canonical partition function
Z=
Tr [exp(H)]
,
TrB [exp(HB )]
(25)
where TrB denotes the partial trace in the Hilbert space of the bath. In the
absence of a systembath coupling, this expression would correspond to the
partition function of the system alone. For a damped harmonic oscillator,
the partition function becomes [33]
Z=
1 Y
n2
~0
2 + n (n ) + 02
n=1 n
(26)
ln(Z) .
(27)
X
202 + n (n ) n2 (n )
1
1+
hEiZ =
n2 + n (n ) + 02
1545
(28)
n=1
X
202 + n (n )
1
1+
hEi =
n2 + n (n ) + 02
(29)
n=1
(30)
where the index B denotes an average with respect to the bath Hamiltonian
HB only. This result differs from the energy hEi = hHS i by the term in
the brackets which, generally, vanishes only in the absence of a system
bath coupling. The coincidence between hEi and hEiZ for the harmonic
oscillator subject to strictly ohmic damping should, therefore, be considered
as exceptional.
Nevertheless, we briefly sketch how one would obtain the specific heat
from the partition function because this will give us as a by-product an
expression for the entropy of the damped harmonic oscillator. For strictly
ohmic damping the product (26) does not converge and in principle a highfrequency cutoff for should be introduced. However, this divergence can
again be traced back to an infinite energy shift due to the environmental
coupling. We may shift the energy by an arbitrary amount by multiplying
the partition function by exp() without changing the entropy or the
specific heat. After performing an appropriate energy shift, we arrive at an
expression of the partition function valid even for strictly ohmic damping
[34], reading
A
2 ~/2
Z=
(1 + + ) (1 + ) ,
(31)
~0 ~0
where (z) is the gamma function, are defined in (22), and A is a constant
whose precise value is irrelevant for the following. By virtue of (4) we obtain
for the entropy the result
~
S = kB 1 ln(~0 ) +
+ g (+ ) + g ( ) ,
(32)
2
1546
(33)
with the digamma function (z) = (z)/ (z). In the absence of damping,
i.e. = 0, this reproduces the result (4) for the entropy of an uncoupled
harmonic oscillator.
For very low temperatures, the entropy (32) vanishes like
S=
2T
kB
+ O(T 3 )
3 0 ~0
(34)
"
#
X
n (n )
1
hp2 i
1+2
,
=
hEi =
2M
2
2 + n (n )
n=1 n
1547
(35)
which can be obtained from the second moment of momentum hp2 i by evaluating the integral (20) by residues. Proceeding as in Sec. 3.2, one derives the
specific heat of the free particle in the presence of strictly ohmic damping
C
~ 2
1 ~
~
=
+
1+
,
(36)
kB
2
2
2
2
which for either T or 0 yields C = kB /2, as expected from the
equipartition theorem. On the other hand, for low temperatures the specific
heat tends to zero as
C
kB T
4 3 kB T 3
+ O(T 5 )
(37)
=
kB
3 ~
15
~
in agreement with the Third Law of thermodynamics. The specific heat (36)
together with its linear low-temperature behavior are depicted in the main
part of Fig. 1 as full and dashed line, respectively. Temperatures kB T ~
much larger than the damping strength are required in order to restore the
classical result C/kB = 1/2.
As the damping strength already serves to set the temperature scale, it
is instructive to introduce a cutoff in the density of states (14) of the bath
oscillators in order to study how a reduction of the environmental influence
0.5
0.4
C/kB
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
kB T /h
1548
D
.
z + D
(38)
(39)
(40)
1549
able to restore the Third Law, yielding a leading linear temperature dependence. Quite counterintuitively, its approach to the classical value occurs
the faster the weaker is the dissipation strength.
In contrast to common quantum statistical mechanics which intrinsically
is based on a vanishingly small coupling to the environment, the finite coupling strength between the sub-system and the bath causes some subtleties
that must be recognized. As made explicit in Sec. 3.3, the thermodynamic
quantities depend on the procedure invoked in their definition: The commonly used expression based on the partition function provides results that
generally do not agree with the result obtained from the corresponding quantum expectation value. Interestingly enough, in the strict ohmic limit (i.e.
in the absence of a high-frequency cutoff) the specific heat for the damped
harmonic oscillator does not depend on the prescription employed. For the
case of memory friction, however, where a finite cutoff frequency is present,
the thermodynamic quantities depend both on the value of this cutoff and
the prescription used in their evaluation.
The results obtained for the low-temperature behavior of the specific
heat of simple quantum systems are not only of academic interest, but may
turn out to be relevant for experiments in nanoscience where one tests the
quantum thermodynamics of small systems [41] that are coupled to an environment with a finite coupling strength.
This work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG) (PH, SFB 486). Both authors like to congratulate Peter Talkner for
his first 60 years and his fine scientific career. We both have heavily profited
repeatedly and continue to strongly profit from his insight and breadth of
knowledge. May our present ongoing fruitful collaborations with him blossom further and even intensify.
REFERENCES
[1] P. Hnggi, F. Marchesoni, Chaos 15, 026101 (2005).
[2] P. Hnggi, A. Alvarez-Chillida, M. Morillo, Physica A 351, XI (2005); special
issue.
[3] C.J. Thomson, Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Oxford University
Press, 1988, chapter I.
[4] H.B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatics, John
Wiley, 1985, 2-nd edition.
[5] W. Ebeling, Zur Geschichte der Thermodynamik in Berlin in: Zur Groen
Berliner Physik, eds. R. Rompe, H.-J. Treder, W. Ebeling, B.G. Teubner,
Leipzig 1987, pp: 7188 and private communication.
[6] W. Ebeling, D. Homan, Eur. Phys. J. 12, 1 (1991).
[7] W. Nernst, Nachr. Kgl. Ges. d. Wiss. Gttingen 6, 1 (1906); see also
W. Nernst, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 13, 311 (1911).
1550
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
J.S. Dugdale, Entropy and Its Physical Meaning, Taylor and Francis, 1996.
J. Wilks, The Third Law of Thermodynamics, Oxford University Press, 1961.
M. Planck, Vorlesungen ber Thermodynamik, Veit & Comp., 1917.
W. Nernst, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 14, 134 (1912).
A.J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 72, 80 (1972).
A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149, 374 (1983).
P.S. Riseborough, P. Hnggi, E. Freidkin, Phys. Rev. A32, 489 (1985).
H. Grabert, P. Schramm, G.-L. Ingold, Phys. Rep. 168, 115 (1988).
P. Hnggi, P. Talkner, M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990).
G. Schn, A.D. Zaikin, Phys. Rep. 198, 237 (1990).
T. Dittrich, P. Hnggi. G.-L. Ingold, B. Kramer, G. Schn, W. Zwerger, Quantum Transport and Dissipation, Wiley-VCH, 1998.
M. Grifoni, P. Hnggi, Phys. Rep. 304, 229 (1998).
U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, World Scientic, 1999, 2-nd edition.
K.M.F. Romero, P. Talkner, P. Hnggi, Phys. Rev. A69, 052109 (2004).
P. Hnggi, G.-L. Ingold, Chaos 15, 026105 (2005).
A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 22, 180 (1907), Err.: A. Einstein, Ann.
Phys. (Leipzig) 22, 800 (1907); A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 35, 679
(1911).
V.B. Magalinski, Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 1381 (1959) [Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 36,
1942 (1959)].
G.W. Ford, J.T. Lewis, R.F. OConnell, Phys. Rev. A37, 4419 (1988).
C. Zerbe, P. Hnggi, Phys. Rev. E52, 1533 (1995).
S. Kohler, T. Dittrich, P. Hnggi, Phys. Rev. E55, 300 (1997).
H. Grabert, P. Hnggi, P. Talkner, J. Stat. Phys. 22, 537 (1980).
P. Hanggi, H. Grabert, G.-L. Ingold, U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 761 (1985).
H. Grabert, U. Weiss, P. Talkner, Z. Phys. B55, 87 (1984).
P.S. Riseborough, P. Hnggi, U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. A31, 471 (1985).
A. Hanke, W. Zwerger, Phys. Rev. E52, 6875 (1995).
The authors of reference [30] introduced two dierent partition functions for
a damped harmonic oscillator, see their Eqs. (4.19), (5.11). The one which
corresponds to our Eq. (26) is denoted as Z and dened in their Eq. (4.19).
G.-L. Ingold, Lect. Notes Phys. 611, 1 (2002).
G.W. Ford, R.F. OConnell, Physica E 29, 82 (2005).
C. Aslangul, N. Pottier, D. Saint-James, J. Stat. Phys. 40, 167 (1985).
V. Hakim, V. Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. A32, 423 (1985).
H. Grabert, P. Schramm, G.-L. Ingold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1285 (1987).
P. Schramm, H. Grabert, J. Stat. Phys. 49, 767 (1987).
R. Jung, G.-L. Ingold, H. Grabert, Phys. Rev. A32, 2510 (1985).
V. pika, Th.M. Nieuwenhuizen, P.D. Keefe, Physica E 29, 1 (2005).
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]