Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Developed by:
WEEK 2
COURSE INSTRUCTOR:
Jack S. Nyman
WEEK 2: READINGS
Readings
The Energy Management Handbook, Chapter 4: Economic
Analysis. Doty & Turner, eds.
TVM Notation:
n = Number of Periods
r or i = Interest Rate
PV = Present Value
FV = Future Value
PMT = Payment
e$ = Energy Dollar
Source: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/timevalueofmoney.asp
In formula form:
P x I x N = Simple Interest
Interest, continued.
Interest, continued.
5.
Source: http://www.frickcpa.com/tvom/TVOM_Assumptions.asp
2.
Present Value: What is the value today of a dollar received n periods in the
future if one's opportunity cost is r?
3.
Future Value of an Annuity: What will a dollar set aside at the end of each
year accumulate to after n periods at r interest?
4.
5.
Sinking Fund Factor: How much must be set aside in each of n periods at
r interest in order to reach a specific sum in the future?
6.
r = 10%; N = 2
FV = $1.00 1.10
Application:
Future value calculations
can be used to show the
amount of money todays
energy savings will grow to
in a specific number of
years.
FV = $1.21
Excel: = , , ,
= (.10,2,0,1)
= $1.00
Application:
Present value calculations can
be used to show todays value of
your future energy savings.
1
1.10
= $0.83
Excel: = , , ,
Application:
(1 + ) 1
=
1 + 0.10 2 1
= 1
0.10
= $2.10
Excel: = , , ,
Application:
Present value of an annuity
calculations can be used to
show the amount of money
your energy savings over a
specific time frame in the
future is worth today.
$1.00 2 ;
= 10%
= $1.74
Excel: = , , ,
(1 + ) 1
= 1
0.1
1 + 0.1 2 1
Application:
Sinking Fund Factor Payment
calculations can be used to
show the amount of money
you would need to set aside
each year in order to achieve
a certain target value at a
future date.
= $0.48
Excel: = (, , 0, 1.00)
Formula Source: http://owll.massey.ac.nz/maths-and-statistics/finance-formulas.php
(1 + )
=
(1 + ) 1
= $1.00
0.1 1 + 0.1 2
1 + 0.1 2 1
Application:
Debt Amortization Payment
calculations can be used to
show the amount of money
you would pay each year in
order to completely amortize
the amount of debt used to
fund energy efficiency
upgrades.
= $0.58
Excel: = (, , 1,0)
Formula Source: http://owll.massey.ac.nz/maths-and-statistics/finance-formulas.php
Year
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
(2,000,000)
Cash Flows
(2,000,000) 400,000
10
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
Note: This cash flow does not include the time value of money.
400,000
450,000
=
=1
(1 + )
Source: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/npv.asp#axzz2BkUNo2EJ
CALCULATING NPV:
STANDARD DISCOUNT RATE
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
0
(2,000,000)
10
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
Cash Flows
(2,000,000) 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 450,000
r
NPV
9%
539,618.00
CALCULATING NPV:
ENERGY SAVINGS DISCOUNT RATE
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
Cash Flows
0
(2,000,000)
10
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
(2,000,000) 400,000
r(e)
NPV
9% Discount Rate NPV
8%
$654,807.62
$539,618.00
Change in NPV
% Change in NPV
$115,189.62
21.35%
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
450,000
0
(2,000,000)
(2,000,000) 400,000
r
NPV
9%
539,618.00
Year
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
0
(2,000,000)
(2,000,000) 400,000
r
NPV
10
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
450,000
10
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
450,000
10
15%
0.00
Year
r
NPV
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
Cash Flows
Cash Flows
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
Cash Flows
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
0
(2,000,000)
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
(2,000,000) 400,000
22%
(328,050.53)
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
450,000
Acquisition Cost
Utilization Cost
Energy Savings
Net Annual Savings
Residual Value
Cash Flows
IRR
0
(2,000,000)
10
(100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
50,000
(2,000,000) 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 450,000
15.3%
Source: http://www.environment.ucla.edu/media_IOE/files/Retrofitting-Commercial-Real-Estate-30-mlg.pdf
WEEK 2: HOMEWORK
1.
Describe the NPV decision rule, and explain the rationale behind it.
How is the rule used by real estate owners and managers to
choose between competing proposals for their portfolios?
2.