Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005.-Immune Thrombocytopenia Caused by Glycoprotein....
2005.-Immune Thrombocytopenia Caused by Glycoprotein....
Chest 2005;127;53S-59S
DOI 10.1378/chest.127.2_suppl.53S
Agents that react with the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa complex (␣IIb/3 integrin) to block
fibrinogen binding and platelet-platelet aggregation have been proved to be effective in reducing
the incidence of complications following coronary angioplasty and are now widely used for this
purpose. Acute thrombocytopenia, which is sometimes severe and life-threatening, is a recog-
nized side effect of this class of drugs. In contrast to other types of drug-induced thrombocyto-
penia, this complication can occur within a few hours of a patient’s first exposure to the
medication. Accumulating evidence has indicated that drug-dependent antibodies, which can be
naturally occurring, are the cause of platelet destruction in such individuals. In this review, we
will consider the clinical aspects of thrombocytopenia resulting from sensitivity to GPIIb/IIIa
inhibitors and will review evidence that the platelet destruction is antibody-mediated.
(CHEST 2005; 127:53S–59S)
Pathogenesis
The development of severe thrombocytopenia
within hours of a patient’s first exposure to abciximab
is in distinct contrast to most types of DITP, which
occurs in patients who have previously been exposed
to the sensitizing drug or have received it for a
number of days. Accordingly, nonimmune mecha-
nisms were initially considered as a possible expla-
nation for the acute platelet destruction that is
typical of this condition. Some reports20 –23 were
consistent with this possibility, but others24,25 argued
against it, leaving this question unresolved.
Figure 1. Reactions of strong IgG antibodies (top) and weak IgG
Thrombocytopenia After Second Exposure to Ab- antibodies (bottom) from patients with abciximab-induced
thrombocytopenia with abciximab (Drug)-coated platelets. No
ciximab: Direct evidence for the immune destruction reaction was obtained with uncoated (No Drug) platelets. From
of platelets in patients who have received abciximab Curtis et al,13 with permission.
of this class are in development. Like abciximab, have also been described,44,45 and no convincing
tirofiban and eptifibatide have been shown32,33 to nonimmune mechanisms have yet been advanced to
reduce the incidence of secondary complications explain acute platelet destruction following drug
following coronary angioplasty. administration. Recent reports36,38,46 have indicated
As with abciximab, a subset of patients treated that patients with thrombocytopenia induced by
with ligand-mimetic GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors will de- tirofiban, eptifibatide, and several other oral inhibi-
velop acute, severe thrombocytopenia.32–35 In some tors40,41,47 often have antibodies that recognize
reported cases,36 –39 the onset of thrombocytopenia GPIIb/IIIa in the presence of the agent being ad-
was accompanied by systemic symptoms such as ministered. As in some patients with abciximab-
chills, fever, and hypotension. The various ligand- induced thrombocytopenia,13 such antibodies can be
mimetic GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors appear to differ in identified in blood samples obtained prior to treat-
their tendency to cause thrombocytopenia. In trials
ment with the drug, indicating that they can be
of the oral inhibitors xemilofiban and orbofiban,
naturally occurring36 (Fig 5). Antibodies of this type
about 0.6% of 12,000 patients who received one of
were not found in patients who received the same
these drugs, but only 0.03% of patients who received
placebo, experienced thrombocytopenia that was drugs and did not experience thrombocytopenia,
judged by a blinded review committee to be “possi- although weaker tirofiban-dependent and eptifi-
bly drug-induced.”40 A second oral drug, roxifiban, batide-dependent antibodies were found in about
caused drug-induced thrombocytopenia in about 2% 3% of healthy persons.36
of treated individuals.41 The incidence of drug- Although accumulating evidence indicates that
induced thrombocytopenia in patients who received thrombocytopenia associated with the administration
tirofiban or eptifibatide has not been rigorously of ligand mimetic GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors is caused by
defined but is probably less than either of these antibodies that recognize ligand-occupied GPIIb/
estimates. The fact that oral inhibitors are adminis- IIIa, the sites on the integrin for which these anti-
tered daily for an extended period of time, whereas bodies are specific have not yet been defined. By
IV drugs are usually infused for less than a day, several criteria, the antibodies appear to recognize
probably explains the greater tendency of the former more than one and perhaps many target epitopes.
to cause thrombocytopenia. First, the binding of some antibodies is totally
blocked by precoating drug-treated platelets with
abciximab, whereas the binding of others is unaf-
Pathogenesis
fected. Second, the antibodies differ from one an-
The onset of acute thrombocytopenia within hours other in respect to the levels of ionized calcium
of the first exposure of a ligand-mimetic GPIIb/IIIa required for drug-dependent binding to their targets
inhibitor suggested that nonimmune factors might (Fig 6).36 It is known that ligand-mimetic com-
be responsible. Several reports42,43 were consistent pounds such as tirofiban and eptifibatide induce
with this possibility, but observations to the contrary conformational changes in the GPIIb/IIIa complex
that are recognized by certain murine monoclonal “activated” by ligand-mimetic drugs, and are capable
antibodies.48,49 Possibly, tirofiban-dependent and of causing severe and sometimes life-threatening
eptifibatide-dependent antibodies recognize similar thrombocytopenia following drug administration.
epitopes (ie, ligand-induced binding sites) on GPIIb/
IIIa. If so, it would appear that certain healthy
individuals have strong, naturally occurring antibod- Treatment of Thrombocytopenia Induced
ies that recognize the GPIIb/IIIa complex that are by GPIIb/IIIa Inhibitors
A platelet count should be performed routinely
before and within 2 to 6 h after starting treatment in
any patient given a GPIIb/IIIIa inhibitor to enable
the early diagnosis of drug-induced thrombocytope-
nia. Some patients who develop thrombocytopenia
are asymptomatic or exhibit only scattered petechial
hemorrhages. Others experience bleeding from sites
of catheterization, GI hemorrhage, or hematoma
formation. Because the function of platelets remain-
ing in the circulation is impaired by the inhibitor, all
patients with this complication should be considered
to be at risk for bleeding, and those with significant
hemorrhage should be given platelet transfusions.
Because tirofiban and eptifibatide are cleared from
Figure 6. Drug-dependent reactions of serum samples from the circulation within hours of discontinuing their
patients who developed acute thrombocytopenia after treatment infusion,50,51 the duration of thrombocytopenia and
with tirofiban at various concentrations of ionized calcium.
Antibody T3 reacted at all concentrations of calcium employed hemorrhagic risk in patients who have received these
and even in the presence of the strong calcium chelator EDTA. drugs is of short duration. Patients who have re-
In contrast, antibody T1 reacted optimally only when the calcium ceived abciximab are at risk for a longer period of
concentration was close to the physiologic range (1.0 mM). No
reactions were obtained in the absence of tirofiban (not shown). time because platelet function is impaired for up to
From Bougie et al,36 with permission. 1 week,30 and thrombocytopenia sometimes persists