Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Centre for Transportation Research, Faculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 15914 Tehran, Iran
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 17 November 2014
Received in revised form
6 April 2015
Accepted 4 June 2015
Available online xxx
Permanent deformation (rutting) is one of the distresses that can adversely affect the bituminous surface
of pavement structures, particularly in hot climates. The geosynthetics reinforcement of hot mix asphalt
is one of the means to combat rutting. In this study, a dynamic creep test was performed on asphalt
concrete samples reinforced with four different types of berglass grid as well as on unreinforced
samples. The berglass grids used in this study contained two different sizes of grid openings and two
tensile strengths, allowing us to test for the mesh size and tensile strength effects of the grids on the
permanent deformation behavior of double layered asphalt concrete. In addition, we tested a recently
developed creep curve model has been veried and used this to study the creep behavior of the samples
in the primary and secondary regions of the creep curve, as well as determining the boundary point of
the regions. The results suggest that not only grid tensile strength, but also grid mesh size is of great
importance in combatting permanent deformation of berglass grid reinforced asphalt concrete within
the conditions and grids used in this study. In a nutshell, higher tensile strength and/or smaller mesh size
grids lead to overall better performance of grid reinforced samples. Moreover, great care must be taken
when the creep curves are not reached in the tertiary region, and the creep rate must be taken into
account to avoid any misinterpretation of the results.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Geosynthetics
Permanent deformation
Asphalt
Dynamic creep test
Creep curve model
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
A bituminous mixture applied to the surface or the base layer of
a pavement structure serves to distribute the trafc load and prevent water from penetrating into underlying unbound layers (Epps
et al., 2000). Due to applied trafc loading, there are many different
types of distresses that can affect bituminous surface layers,
including permanent deformation (rutting), and fatigue cracking.
In recent years, because of increases in the volume of trafc and
of heavy vehicles, rutting is one of the most frequent defects found
in exible pavements, particularly in hot climates. Rutting shows
up as depressions formed in the wheel path in a pavement. It
normally occurs when a permanent deformation of each layer in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
0266-1144/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
reinforced with smaller grid mesh sizes than those with larger
mesh sizes.
As quoted by Zhou et al. (2004), different mathematical models
such as Barksdale's Semilog model (1972), Power-law models based
on the Monismith model (1975), and Tseng and Lytton's model
(1989), have been developed in order to t the creep curve and
estimate the ow number parameter in asphalt mixtures. For tting
and distinguishing between regions of the unmodied asphalt
mixture creep curve, Zhou et al. (2004) proposed a three-stage
model: a power model for the primary region, a linear model for
the secondary, and an exponential model for the tertiary region. In
other words, they modeled each region of the creep curve separately. At the same time, some other researchers believe that the
logarithmic model simulates more accurately the primary region of
the creep curves in SBS modied asphalt mixtures (Kalyoncuoglu
and Tigdemir, 2011; Ahari et al., 2013).
Ahari et al. (2013) developed a two-stage model for the primary
and secondary regions of creep curves in SBS modied asphalt
mixtures. They proposed two different approaches for modeling
the primary and secondary regions of the creep curve as follows:
Approach 1. Both the primary and secondary regions of the creep
curve can be modeled simultaneously using the following logarithmic function:
3P a LnX b
where:
X: is loading cycle
3P: is accumulated permanent strain at loading cycle X
a, b: are constants
Then, in order to check if the developed logarithmic function ts
well with both regions, the deviation errors of all the points, re
calculated as below, must be less than or equal to 1%:
De
3PCalculated 3PMeasured
3PMeasured
100
where:
De: is deviation error (%)
Approach 2. In order to identify the boundary points of the primary and secondary regions of the creep curve, the following steps
are taken:
1 Visual selection of loading cycles among the initial loading cycles of the secondary region. [It must be noted that this loading
cycle is not necessarily the boundary point]
2 Removal of the loading cycles before the selected loading cycles,
and plotting a new graph representing the approximate secondary linear region.
3 Fitting a linear model to the approximate secondary region and
determining the model coefcients.
4 Calculating the accumulated permanent strain for all the loading
cycles of the approximate secondary region, based on obtaining
model coefcients.
5 Determining the deviation error (De) for all of the calculated
accumulated permanent strains.
6 If simultaneously all the De(s) 1% / the criterion is met and
the linear model is assumed to be representative.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Table 1
Basic properties of ber glass grid applied.
Identication
Glass grid A
Glass grid B
Glass grid AA
Glass grid BB
115 115
/15
12.5 12.5
115 115
/15
25 25
115 215
/15
12.5 12.5
115 215
/15
25 19
2.5
4600 4600
2.5
4600 4600
2.5
4600 8600
2.5
4600 8600
Table 2
Physical properties of tested samples.
Sample code
C
R1
R2
R3
R4
e
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
2.226
2.225
2.225
2.225
2.222
2.425
2.425
2.425
2.425
2.425
8.23
8.27
8.25
8.23
8.36
grid
grid
grid
grid
A
B
AA
BB
ensure proper contact between the core surface and loading platen.
Moreover, all the samples were conditioned at 40 C for about 4 h in
a temperature chamber to make sure that they had reached the
testing temperature.
Fig. 2. Creep curves of tested mixtures, including reinforced and control samples.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Table 3
Comparison of permanent strains in the last cycle.
Sample code
Tensile strength
(kN/m) (MD XD)
C
R1
e
115 115*L
/15
115 115*L
/15
115 215*H
/15
115 215*H
/15
e
12.5 12.5**S
11,438
8756
0
31
8564
34
8495
35
7819
46
R2
R3
R4
25 25**OL
12.5 12.5**
25 19**OL
*L: Low level for grid tensile strength; *H: High level for grid tensile strength; **S: Small level for grid opening size; **OL: Large level for grid opening size.
y a blnx
b is the ratio of absolute change in y to the relative change in x. In
other words, if x changes by 1%, then the absolute change in y is
0.01b unit (Thomas et al., 2001). However, the slope of the primary
region is not as important as that of the secondary region. In our
study, the slope of the tted curve in the primary and secondary
regions was determined for each individual sample type. The
extend of improvement for each (in terms of smaller permanent
strain accumulation rates) was then determined based on the
control sample. These results are shown in Table 5. It is worth
noting that the control samples in this table have their maximum
slopes in both primary and secondary regions of the creep curves.
Table 4
Creep curve models based on Ahari's model and estimated critical values.
Code First stage model
C
R1
R2
R3
R4
7072
10,863
3945
8001
36
3223
7592
43
3001
7666
42
4847
7120
53
Last cycle
Cycle (N) 3p(modeled) Improved 3p
compared to
control sample (%)
11,502
8810
31
8618
33
8570
34
7860
46
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Fig. 5. Measured and estimated permanent deformation for C, R3, & R4 samples.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Table 5
Slope comparison of primary and secondary regions.
Code
C
R1
R2
R3
R4
Tensile strength
(kN/m) (MD XD)
Primary region
Slope
Secondary region
Slope
e
115 115*L
/15
115 115*L
/15
115 215*H
/15
115 215*H
/15
e
12.5 12.5**S
1523.9
1114.5
0
37
0.2155
0.1336
0
61
25 25**OL
1075.8
42
0.1515
42
12.5 12.5**S
1062.9
43
0.1291
67
25 19**OL
954.6
60
0.1436
50
*L: Low level for grid tensile strength; *H: High level for grid tensile strength; **S: Small level for grid opening size; **OL: Large level for grid opening size.
Fig. 6. One-to one graph of measured vs. estimated permanent strain of last cycle.
Barksdale, R.D., 1972. Laboratory Evaluation of Rutting in Base Course Materials. Paper
presented at the Third International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt
Pavements, Grosvenor House, Park Lane, London, England, Sept. 11e15, 1972.
Bertuliene, L., Oginskas, R., Bulevicius, M., 2011. Research of Rut Depth in Asphalt
Pavements Reinforced with Geosynthetic Materials. Paper presented at the 8th
International Conference Environmental Engineering, Lithuania.
Collin, J., Kinney, T., Fu, X., 1996. Full scale highway load test of exible pavement
systems with geogrid reinforced base courses. Geosynth. Int. 3 (4), 537e549.
Cominsky, R., Killingsworth, B., Anderson, R., Anderson, D., Crockford, W., 1998.
Quality Control and Acceptance of Superpave-Designed Hot Mix Asphalt.
NCHRP Report 409.
EN, C., 12697-33, 2003. Bituminous Mixtures. Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt.
Part 33: Specimen Prepared by Roller Compactor.
EN, C., 12697-25, 2005. Bituminous Mixtures e Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt
Part 25: Cyclic Compression Test.
Epps, A., Harvey, J.T., Kim, Y.R., Roque, R., 2000. Structural Requirements of Bituminous Paving Mixtures. Transportation in the New Millennium.
Fei, Y., Yang, Y., 2009. Fem analysis on geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete pavement. Geosynth. Civ. Environ. Eng. 677e682.
Ferrotti, G., Canestrari, F., Pasquini, E., Virgili, A., 2012. Experimental evaluation of
the inuence of surface coating on berglass geogrid performance in asphalt
pavements. Geotext. Geomembr. 34 (0), 11e18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
geotexmem.2012.02.011.
Fwa, T., Tan, S., Zhu, L., 2004. Rutting prediction of asphalt pavement layer using
cef model. J. Transp. Eng. 130 (5), 675e683.
Gabra, R., Horvli, I., 2006. Simplied Testing Method for Evaluation of Asphalt
Mixtures for Their Susceptibility to Permanent Deformation.
Jenkins, K.J., Dennison, P., Ebels, L.J., Mullins, L.S., 2004. 3-D Polymer Grid Reinforcement of Asphalt for Rut Resistance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of
the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04),
Southern Africa.
Kaloush, K., Witczak, M., 2002. Tertiary ow characteristics of asphalt mixtures
(with discussion and closure). J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 71, 248e280.
Kalyoncuoglu, S., Tigdemir, M., 2011. A model for dynamic creep evaluation of SBS
modied HMA mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2), 859e866.
Kandhal, P.S., Chakraborty, S., 1996. Evaluation of Voids in the Mineral Aggregate for
HMA Paving Mixtures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual
Conference-Canadian Technical Asphalt Association.
Komatsu, T., Kikuta, H., Tuji, Y., Muramatsu, E., 1998. Durability assessment of
geogrid-reinforced asphalt concrete. Geotext. Geomembr. 16 (5), 257e271.
Laurinavi
cius, A., Oginskas, R., 2006. Experimental research on the development of
rutting in asphalt concrete pavements reinforced with geosynthetic materials.
J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 12 (4), 311e317.
Lee, K.W., Gundapuneni, S.K., Singh, A., 2010. Effects of Asphalt Binder Grade on the
Performance of Rhode Island Hot-Mix Asphalt.
Leshchinsky, B., Ling, H., 2012. Effects of geocell connement on strength and
deformation behavior of gravel. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (2), 340e352.
Ling, H.I., Liu, Z., 2001. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt pavements.
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (2), 177e184.
Mehta, Y., Guercio, M.C., McCarthy, L., 2014. Determine Viscoelastic Mechanical
Properties of Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA)-Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)
Mixes under High Stresses in Aireld Flexible Pavements and Its Impacts on
Design Life.
Monismith, C.L., Ogawa, N., Freeme, C.R., 1975. Permanent deformation characterization of subgrade soils due to repeated loading. Transp. Res. Rec. 537, 1e17.
Perkins, S., 1999. Mechanical response of geosynthetic-reinforced exible pavements. Geosynth. Int. 6 (5), 347e382.
Perkins, S., Ismeik, M., 1997. A synthesis and evaluation of geosynthetic-reinforced
base layers in exible pavements e part I. Geosynth. Int. 4 (6), 549e604.
Siriwardane, H., Gondle, R., Kutuk, B., 2010. Analysis of exible pavements reinforced with geogrids. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 28 (3), 287e297.
Sivilevi
cius, H., Petkevi
cius, K., 2002. Regularities of defect development in the
asphalt concrete road pavements. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 8 (3), 206e213.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003
Sobhan, K., Genduso, M., Tandon, V., 2005. Effects of Geosynthetic Reinforcement on
the Propagation of Reection Cracking and Accumulation of Permanent
Deformation in Asphalt Overlays. Paper presented at the Third LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCET2005) Advances in Engineering and Technology: a Global
Perspective, Cartegena, Columbia.
Tayfur, S., Ozen, H., Aksoy, A., 2007. Investigation of rutting performance of asphalt
mixtures containing polymer modiers. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2), 328e337.
Thakur, J.K., Han, J., Pokharel, S.K., Parsons, R.L., 2012. Performance of geocellreinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under
cyclic plate loading. Geotext. Geomembr. 35, 14e24.
Thomas, G.B., Finney, R.L., Weir, M.D., Giordano, F.R., 2001. Thomas' Calculus.
Addison-Wesley.
Tseng, K.-H., Lytton, R.L., 1989. Prediction of permanent deformation in exible
pavement materials. In: Implication of Aggregates in the Design, Construction,
and Performance of Flexible Pavements, pp. 154e172. ASTM STP, 1016.
Tutumluer, E., Huang, H., Bian, X., 2010. Geogrideaggregate interlock mechanism
investigated through aggregate imaging-based discrete element modeling
approach. Int. J. Geomech. 12 (4), 391e398.
Verhaeghe, B., Myburgh, P., Denneman, E., 2007. Asphalt Rutting and Its Prevention.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'07), Gaborone, Botswana.
Virgili, A., Canestrari, F., Grilli, A., Santagata, F., 2009. Repeated load test on bituminous systems reinforced by geosynthetics. Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (3),
187e195.
Yang, X., Han, J., Pokharel, S.K., Manandhar, C., Parsons, R.L., Leshchinsky, D.,
Halahmi, I., 2012. Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocellreinforced sand bases. Geotext. Geomembr. 32, 95e103.
Zhou, F., Scullion, T., Sun, L., 2004. Verication and modeling of three-stage permanent deformation behavior of asphalt mixes. J. Transp. Eng. 130 (4),
486e494.
Please cite this article in press as: Mirzapour Mounes, S., et al., Evaluation of permanent deformation of geogrid reinforced asphalt concrete
using dynamic creep test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003