Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Framework For Building Ontology in Edu
A Framework For Building Ontology in Edu
AbstractIn this paper we have proposed a method of creating domain ontology using protg tool. Existing ontology does not take
the semantic into context while displaying the information about different modules. This paper proposed a methodology for the
derivation and implementation of ontology in education domain using protg 4.3.0 tool.
I. INTRODUCTION
There is large amount of data available on net, which is
dispersed, superfluous and inaccurate by nature, makes use of
the information difficult. This problem is often referred to as
Information overload. Existing technologies lack ability to
perform significant analysis and filtering of data, there by
presenting results that only human can process and not
machine.
The purpose of semantic web idea was to provide
meaningful web that can be processed by machines and
humans equally [1]. The web can review the intent of user and
provide results that fulfil the information requirement. Since,
there is a prospective to create diverse ontologies on a same
domain as no common criteria exist for building ontologies.
This paper presents a methodology for the derivation and
implementation of ontology in education domain. The key
concepts of the domain with its data properties have been
discussed. Model is implemented in using protg 4.3.0. This
paper covers the major aspects of Education domain including
super class and subclass hierarchy, creating a subclass
instances for class diagram, properties and their relations etc.
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3154033
399
https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
IV. MOTIVATION
The specific features of this domain are: Every concept refers to a semantically distinct entity.
The concepts in a domain are related to each other
through different relationships.
Different types of relationships may exist and the
same concept can be represented by different words.
The phenomenon of synonymy is very common. So
the same concept may be referred to by several terms.
For example, the terms DM and Data Model refers to
the same concept.
V. PROPOSED WORK
The main initiative in this paper is to research and characterize
appropriate approach to ontology development. Analysing the
specific features of the domain, it is identified that
requirements for representing the domain knowledge are as
follows: Representing the Educational domain which can
serve to potential students in making the choice of
their desirable Concepts.
Creating Meta data about Educational systems.
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3154033
400
https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3154033
401
https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
VIII.
VISUALIZATION OF ONTOLOGY
The final process that generates an ontology as the
knowledge representation is shown in Fig 6 .In this ontology
IX. CONCLUSION
This paper details the steps that transform taxonomy into a
domain concept and explains how this structure is transformed
into more formal domain ontology. We would like to realize
the generation of more complex concepts that exploit the
existing ontology concept as well as available ontologies to
fulfill Educational objective.
REFERENCES
[1] "W3C Semantic Web Activity". World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/. Retrieved Jan 15, 2012.
[2] Vega, J. C. A. (2000). WebODE 1.0: Users Manual. Laboratory of
Artificial Intelligence,Technical University of Madrid
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3154033
402
[3] Kietz ,JU., Maedche ,A., Volz, R. (2001), "A Method for SemiAutomatic Ontology Acquisition from a Corporate Intranet," In: N.
Aussenac-Gilles,B. Biebow, S. Szulman(eds) EKAW'00 Workshop on
Ontologies andTexts. Juan-Les-Pins, France. CEUR Workshop
Proceedings 2000,51:4.1-4.14. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Available:
http://CEURWS.org/Vol-51 ,2000
[4] Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubzy,
M., Eriksson, H.,Noy, N. F., Tu, S.W. (2002). The evolution of Protege:
an Environment for Knowledgebased Systems Development.
International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58, 89123.
[5] Arabshian, K., Danielsen, P. & Afroz, S.(2012). Lexont:
Semiautomatic ontology creation tool for programmable web. In
AAAI 2012 Spring Symposium on Intelligent Web Services Meet
Social Computing, Palo Alto, CA, March 2012.
[6] Danielsen, Peter J. & Arabshian, Knarig (2013). User Interface Design
in Semi-Automated Ontology Construction,IEEE 20th International
Conference on Web Services,2013.
[7] Boyce, S., & Pahl, C. (2007). Developing Domain Ontologies for
Course Content. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (3),275-288.
https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
[8] Fortuna Blaz, Grobelnik Marko & Mladenic Dunja(2006): Semiautomatic Data-driven Ontology Construction System. In: Proceedings
of the 9th International multi-conference Information Society IS-2006,
Ljubljana, Slovenia (2006).
[9] Fortuna Blaz, Grobelnik Marko & Mladenic Dunja(2007), OntoGen:
Semi-automatic Ontology Editor: Human Interface, Part II, HCII 2007,
LNCS 4558, pp. 309318, 2007.
[10] Jia, M., Yang, B., Zheng D., Sun, W., Liu, Li., Yang, Jing.,(2009)
Automatic Ontology Construction Approaches and Its Application on
Military
Intelligence,
Asia-Pacific
Conference
on
InformationProcessing (APCIP), vol. 2, Pp. 348 351, 2009.
[11] Bhowmick P.K., Roy D., Sarkar S. & Basu A.(2010), A Framework
For Manual Ontology Engineering For Management Of Learning
Material Repository,2010.
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3154033
403
https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500