Scribd
Upload
42 views1 page

Peer Review Assessment Template

This document is a peer review assessment for a group design project. It lists the possible ratings for evaluating individual team members' contributions from excellent to no show. Members are to write the names of all team members, including themselves, and rate their level of participation, effort, and responsibility to the team's goals using the provided scale. Space is included to provide a reason for any rating lower than satisfactory.

Uploaded by

Henry Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
42 views1 page

Peer Review Assessment Template

This document is a peer review assessment for a group design project. It lists the possible ratings for evaluating individual team members' contributions from excellent to no show. Members are to write the names of all team members, including themselves, and rate their level of participation, effort, and responsibility to the team's goals using the provided scale. Space is included to provide a reason for any rating lower than satisfactory.

Uploaded by

Henry Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Peer review assessment

Peer review assesments


Group :
Design Task: 1 2 3 ( please circle)
Please write the names of all team members, and rate the degree to which each member
fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing the homework assignments including you. The
possible ratings are as follows:
Marks
91-100

Rating
Excellent

81-90

Very good

71-80

Satisfactory

Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative

61-70
51-60

Ordinary
Marginal

Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared

41-50
31-40
21-30
0-20

Deficient
Unsatisfactory
Superficial
No show

Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared


Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, unprepared
Practically no participation
No participation at all

Consistently went above and beyondtutored teammates, carried more than


his/her fair share of the load
Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative

These ratings should reflect each individuals level of participation and effort and sense of
responsibility, to achieve the goals of the team/group not his or her academic ability.
Name
1.

Rating

Reason for Rating < Satisfactory

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Signature:

Date :
Reference: Deborah B. Kaufman And Richard M. Felder. 2000. Accounting for
Individual Effort In Cooperative Learning Teams, J. Engr. Education, 89(2), 133
140

You might also like