You are on page 1of 3

Student Peer Evaluation

Category For Evaluation Possible Scores


1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Work: Consider Produces unacceptable Occasionally produces work Meets minimum group or Regularly produces work Produces work that
the degree to which the work, fails to meet that meets minimum group project requirements. that meets minimum consistently exceeds
student team member minimum group or project or project requirements. requirements and sometimes established group or project
provides work that is accurate requirements. exceeds project or group requirements.
and complete. requirements.
Timeliness of Work: Fails to meet deadlines set Occasionally misses Regularly meets deadlines Consistently meets Consistently completes
Consider the student team by group. deadlines set by group. set by group. deadlines set by group and work ahead of schedule.
member's timeliness of work. occasionally completes
work ahead of schedule.
Task Support: Consider the Gives no task support to Sometimes gives task Occasionally provides task Consistently provides task Consistently gives more
amount of task support the other members. support to other members. support to other group support to other group task support than expected.
student team member gives to members. members.
other team members.
Interaction: Consider how Behavior is detrimental to Behavior is inconsistent and Regularly projects Consistently demonstrates Consistently demonstrates
the student team member group. occasionally distracts group appropriate team behavior appropriate team behavior. exemplary team behavior.
relates and communicates to meetings. including: listening to
other team members. others, and allowing his/her
ideas to be criticized.
Attendance: Consider the Failed to attend the group Attended 1%-32% of the Attended 33%-65% of the Attended 66%-99% of the Attended 100% of the group
student team member's meetings. group meetings. group meetings. group meetings. meetings.
attendance at the group
meetings. (This includes in
class meetings.)
Responsibility: Consider the Is unwilling to carry out Sometimes carries out Carries out assigned tasks Consistently carries out Consistently carries out
ability of the student team assigned tasks. assigned tasks but never but never volunteers to do a assigned tasks and assigned tasks and always
member to carry out a chosen volunteers to do a task. task. occasionally volunteers for volunteers for other tasks.
or assigned task, the degree to other tasks.
which the student can be
relied upon to complete a
task.
Involvement: Consider the Fails to participate in Sometimes participates in Takes part in group Regularly participates in Consistently exceeds group
extent to which the student group discussions and fails group discussions and rarely discussions and shares group discussion and expectations for
team member participates in to share relevant material. contributes relevant material relevant information. sometimes exceeds participation and
the exchange of information for the project. expectations. consistently contributes
(does outside research, brings relevant material to project.
outside knowledge to group).
Leadership: Consider how Does not display Displays minimal leadership Occasionally assumes Regularly displays good Consistently demonstrates
the team member engages in leadership skills. skills in team. leadership role. leadership skills. exemplary leadership skills.
leadership activities.
Overall Performance Performance significantly Performance fails to meet Performance meets all Performance meets all Performance consistently
Rating: Consider the overall fails to meet group some group requirements. group requirements. group requirements exceeds all group
performance of the student requirements. consistently and sometimes requirements.
team member while in the exceeds requirements.
group.
1
Student Peer Evaluation

Guidelines:

✔ Disregard your general impressions and concentrate on one factor at a time.

✔ Study carefully the definition given for each factor and the specifications for each category.

✔ Call to mind instances that are typical of the student's work and behavior. Do not be influenced by unusual cases
that are not typical.

✔ Determine the category that best describes the student's accomplishments in that area and enter the number on the
separate performance rating form on the third page. Only submit the third page.

✔ If a factor has not been observed during the rating period, enter NA for not applicable. In the comments section,
explain why this factor has not been observed.

✔ Comments should be used to support your ratings where applicable.

✔ Make sure to include yourself when filling out the evaluation form on the third page.
.

2
Student Peer Evaluation

Your Name:
Date:
Instructions:
⮚ Fill out the evaluation form listed below for all of your group members. Make sure to include yourself.

⮚ For each of the 9 categories listed on the first page of this document, enter the appropriate score (1 to 5 or NA). Repeat this for
each group member.
⮚ List all of the tasks you completed for the project. In other words, what specifically did you contribute to the team effort?

⮚ As needed, enter comments about group members below the form. Use the back of this sheet or additional sheets as necessary. (If
you use the back, please indicate this on the bottom of the front page.)
⮚ Only submit this page and any additional comment pages to your TA during your final lab.

Group Members Names Quali Timel Task Inter Atten Resp Invol Lead Over Tot
ty of iness suppo actio dance onsibi veme ershi all al
work of rt n lity nt p Perfo
work rman
ce

List below the specific tasks you completed for the project:

General Comments:

You might also like