Student Peer Evaluation
Category For Evaluation
Quality of Work: Consider
the degree to which the student
team member provides work
that is accurate and complete.
Timeliness of Work: Consider
the student team member's
timeliness of work.
Task Support: Consider the
amount of task support the
student team member gives to
other team members.
Interaction: Consider how the
student team member relates
and communicates to other
team members.
Attendance: Consider the
student team member's
attendance at the group
meetings. (This includes in
class meetings.)
Responsibility: Consider the
ability of the student team
member to carry out a chosen
or assigned task, the degree to
which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.
Involvement: Consider the
extent to which the student
team member participates in
the exchange of information
(does outside research, brings
outside knowledge to group).
Leadership: Consider how the
team member engages in
leadership activities.
Overall Performance Rating:
Consider the overall
performance of the student
team member while in the
group.
1 2
Produces unacceptable work,
fails to meet minimum group
or project requirements.
Fails to meet deadlines set by
group.
Gives no task support to other
members.
Behavior is detrimental to
group.
Failed to attend the group
meetings.
Is unwilling to carry out
assigned tasks.
Fails to participate in group
discussions and fails to share
relevant material.
Does not display leadership
skills.
Performance significantly fails
to meet group requirements.
Possible Scores
3 4 5
Occasionally produces work Meets minimum group or Regularly produces work that Produces work that
that meets minimum group or project requirements. meets minimum requirements consistently exceeds
project requirements. and sometimes exceeds project established group or project
or group requirements. requirements.
Occasionally misses deadlines Regularly meets deadlines set Consistently meets deadlines Consistently completes work
set by group. by group. set by group and occasionally ahead of schedule.
completes work ahead of
schedule.
Sometimes gives task support Occasionally provides task Consistently provides task Consistently gives more task
to other members. support to other group support to other group support than expected.
members. members.
Behavior is inconsistent and Regularly projects appropriate Consistently demonstrates Consistently demonstrates
occasionally distracts group team behavior including: appropriate team behavior. exemplary team behavior.
meetings. listening to others, and
allowing his/her ideas to be
criticized.
Attended 1%-32% of the group Attended 33%-65% of the Attended 66%-99% of the Attended 100% of the group
meetings. group meetings. group meetings. meetings.
Sometimes carries out Carries out assigned tasks but Consistently carries out Consistently carries out
assigned tasks but never never volunteers to do a task. assigned tasks and assigned tasks and always
volunteers to do a task. occasionally volunteers for volunteers for other tasks.
other tasks.
Sometimes participates in Takes part in group Regularly participates in group Consistently exceeds group
group discussions and rarely discussions and shares discussion and sometimes expectations for participation
contributes relevant material relevant information. exceeds expectations. and consistently contributes
for the project. relevant material to project.
Displays minimal leadership Occasionally assumes Regularly displays good Consistently demonstrates
skills in team. leadership role. leadership skills. exemplary leadership skills.
Performance fails to meet Performance meets all group Performance meets all group Performance consistently
some group requirements. requirements. requirements consistently and exceeds all group
sometimes exceeds requirements.
requirements.
1
 Student Peer Evaluation

Guidelines:

 Disregard your general impressions and concentrate on one factor at a time.

 Study carefully the definition given for each factor and the specifications for each category.

 Call to mind instances that are typical of the student's work and behavior. Do not be influenced by unusual cases
that are not typical.

 Determine the category that best describes the student's accomplishments in that area and enter the number on the
separate performance rating form on the third page. Only submit the third page.

 If a factor has not been observed during the rating period, enter NA for not applicable. In the comments section,
explain why this factor has not been observed.

 Comments should be used to support your ratings especially if you rate your member 5 and 1

2
 Student Peer Evaluation

Your name: Chee Kok Yuen Date: 27/7/23

Instructions:
 Fill out the evaluation form listed below for all of your group members.
 For each of the 9 categories listed on the first page of this document, enter the appropriate score (1 to 5 or NA). Repeat this for
each group member.
 As needed, enter comments about group members below the form. Include additional sheets as necessary.
 Only submit this page and additional justifications.

Overall Performance
timeliness of work
Quality of work

Responsibility
Task support

Involvement
Attendance

Leadership
Interaction
Group Members Names
Woo jia wen 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cheng wei wen 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 4
Kelly sim 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Lee jun ming 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Toon Ching wen 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 3 4

Justifications/comments: