This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the legal document:
The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding James R. Freeling's appeal against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of the FDIC, agreeing with the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The case was heard by a panel of three judges from the appeals court based on the transcript of record from the lower district court.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the legal document:
The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding James R. Freeling's appeal against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of the FDIC, agreeing with the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The case was heard by a panel of three judges from the appeals court based on the transcript of record from the lower district court.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the legal document:
The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding James R. Freeling's appeal against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of the FDIC, agreeing with the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The case was heard by a panel of three judges from the appeals court based on the transcript of record from the lower district court.
v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 7314.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Sept. 30, 1963.
Delmer L. Stagner, Sam W. Moore, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
John H. Cantrell, Oklahoma City, Okl., John F. Lord, Gen. Counsel, Leslie H. Fisher, Asst. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit judges. PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by this court that the
judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the Trial Court's opinion, D.C., 221 F.Supp. 955.
United States v. Harry Greenberg, Dominic Mattia, Nick Pannarella, Ernest Paul, Alfred Sireci, and Hirschel Weisbord, AKA Hirschel Washbord, Alfred Sireci, 419 F.2d 808, 3rd Cir. (1969)
United States v. William L. Kann, William L. Kann, JR., Elise K. Goldman, Betty K. Wilson and Robert M. Kann, Additional, 333 F.2d 146, 3rd Cir. (1964)