Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frank Jackson v. United States, 414 F.2d 352, 3rd Cir. (1969)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    Frank Jackson appealed the denial of his petition to vacate his sentence for theft of a money order while employed by the Internal Revenue Service. He claimed he was deprived of his right to counsel during criminal proceedings against him, resulting in an involuntary confession and guilty plea. The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's denial, finding no error based on Judge Wortendyke's opinion that Jackson's claims lacked merit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1969-05-23 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 414 F.2d 352 Docket: 17583

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Jackson appealed the denial of his petition to vacate his sentence for theft of a money order while employed by the Internal Revenue Service. He claimed he was deprived of his right to counsel during criminal proceedings against him, resulting in an involuntary confession and guilty plea. The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's denial, finding no error based on Judge Wortendyke's opinion that Jackson's claims lacked merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Frank Jackson v. United States, 414 F.2d 352, 3rd Cir. (1969)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Jackson appealed the denial of his petition to vacate his sentence for theft of a money order while employed by the Internal Revenue Service. He claimed he was deprived of his right to counsel during criminal proceedings against him, resulting in an involuntary confession and guilty plea. The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's denial, finding no error based on Judge Wortendyke's opinion that Jackson's claims lacked merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    414 F.

    2d 352

    Frank JACKSON, Appellant,


    v.
    UNITED STATES of America.
    No. 17583.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Submitted on Briefs May 9, 1969.
    Decided May 23, 1969.

    Frank Jackson, pro se.


    Jerome D. Schwitzer, Asst. U.S. Atty., David M. Satz, Jr., Newark, N.J.,
    for appellee.
    Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    PER CURIAM.

    The District Court denied the defendant Jackson's petition for vacation of
    sentence which was premised on his contention that he was deprived of his
    right to counsel at all phases of the criminal proceedings against him and that as
    a result he made an involuntary confession and entered a guilty plea to an
    indictment charging him with theft of a money order while in the employ of the
    Internal Revenue Service.

    On review of the record we find no error.

    The Order of the District Court denying Jackson's petition will be affirmed for
    the reasons so well stated in Judge Wortendyke's Opinion, 302 F.Supp. 216.

    You might also like