Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gilbert G.G. Donders, MD, PhD,a Eugene Bosmans, MD,b Alfons Dekeersmaecker,b
Annie Vereecken, Pharm,b Ben Van Bulck, MD,c and Bernard Spitz, MD, PhDa
Leuven and Antwerp, Belgium
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the relationships between microscopy findings on wet
mounts, such as lactobacillary grade or vaginal leukocytosis, and results of vaginal culture, lactate and succinate content of the vagina, and levels of selected cytokines.
STUDY DESIGN: In a population of 631 unselected women seeking treatment at an obstetrics and gynecology
outpatient clinic, vaginal fluid was obtained by wooden Ayre spatula for wet mounting and pH measurement, by
high vaginal swab for culture, and by standardized vaginal rinsing with 2 mL 0.9% sodium chloride solution for
measurements of lactate, succinate, interleukin 1, interleukin 8, leukemia inhibitory factor, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist concentrations. Lactate and succinate levels were measured by gas-liquid chromatography
and the cytokine concentrations were measured by specific immunoassays. Both univariate analysis (Student t
test, Welch test, 2 test, and Fisher exact test) and multivariate regression analysis (Cox analysis) were used.
RESULTS: Increasing disturbance of the lactobacillary flora (lactobacillary grades I, IIa, IIb, and III) was highly
correlated with the presence of Gardnerella vaginalis, Trichomonas vaginalis, enterococci, group B streptococci,
and Escherichia coli. Vaginal pH and interleukin 8 and interleukin 1 concentrations increased linearly with increasing lactobacillary grade, whereas lactate concentrations and the presence of epithelial cell lysis decreased.
A similar pattern of associations with increasing leukocyte count was clear, but in addition there was an increase
in leukemia inhibitory factor concentration. Multivariate analysis of vaginal leukocytosis, lactobacillary grades,
and the presence of positive vaginal culture results showed that interleukin 1 concentration was most closely
related to the lactobacillary grade, leukemia inhibitory factor concentration was most closely related to the lactobacillary grade and positive culture results, interleukin 8 concentration was most closely related to positive culture results, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist concentration was most closely related to vaginal leukocytosis
and positive culture results. The concentration ratio of interleukin 1 to interleukin 1 receptor antagonist remained stable, except when vaginal leukocytosis increased. In its most severe form, with >10 leukocytes per epithelial cell present, a decompensation of the vaginal flora with a collapse in interleukin 1 and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist concentrations was seen, but there was a concurrent sharp increase in leukemia inhibitory
factor concentration. This pattern was completely different from the course of the cytokine concentrations associated with a lactobacillary grade increase.
CONCLUSION: Both disturbed lactobacillary grade and the presence of increasing vaginal leukocytosis were
correlated with lactobacillary substrate (lactate) concentration, pH, and the concentrations of a variety of cytokines. There was a remarkably linear increase in these cytokines as either leukocytosis or lactobacillary grade
became more severe. In circumstances in which leukocytosis was extreme, however, interleukin 1 was no
longer produced but leukemia inhibitory factor concentrations increased. We speculate that in extreme inflammation the body tries to limit the damage that can be done by exaggerated cytokine production. (Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2000;182:872-8.)
Key words: Bacterial vaginosis, cytokines, interleukin, lactobacillary grades, lactobacilli, wet mount
microscopy
872
Donders et al 873
and right upper areas of the vaginal vault for centrifugation and measurements of lactate, succinate, IL-1, IL-8,
LIF, and IL-1RA concentrations in the supernatant.
Lactate and succinate levels were measured by gas-liquid
chromatography, and the cytokine concentrations were
measured by specific immunoassays. All samples were collected and partially processed by one person (Gilbert
G.G. Donders, MD, PhD); they arrived at the laboratory
for further processing within 6 hours after sampling.
Samples were transported at room temperature and then
frozen at 18C for batch analysis at a later time.
Immune assays of cytokine levels. IL-1 concentration
was determined with a Cistron (catalog No. 03-HS96;
Cistron Biotechnology, Pine Brook, NJ) high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, a monoclonal antibodybased sequential enzyme immunoassay
that was specific for human IL-1 with a dynamic range of
2 to 1000 pg/mL. IL-8 concentration measurements were
performed with a Eurogenetics (catalog No. E01-18-1300;
Eurogenetics, Tessenderlo, Belgium) ELISA kit, a sandwich ELISA that is based on a monoclonal and polyclonal
antibody combination covering a dynamic range of 25 to
1500 pg/mL. LIF levels were determined with a Eurogenetics ELISA kit (catalog No. E04-18-1290), a monoclonal antibodybased two-step sandwich ELISA with a dynamic range of 25 to 1000 pg/mL in which 25 pg/mL is
the detection limit. The IL-1RA ELISA used for this study
was a Eurogenetics kit (catalog No. E01-18-1370) with a
calibration curve ranging from 50 pg/mL to 10 ng/mL.
For each of these immunologic methods the vaginal fluid
washings were diluted such that most of the resulting cytokine concentrations were located in the middle of the
calibration curves for each cytokine.
Grading of the lactobacillary morphotypes. The wet
mount grading system was modified14 from Schrders
original classification.15 The numbers of lactobacillary
morphotypes were estimated in comparison with the
numbers of other bacteria present, leading to 4 groups.
Normal flora (lactobacillary grade I) comprised a predominance of lactobacillary morphotypes, with few coccoid bacteria present. Care must be taken not to misdiagnose the cellular debris from lysed epithelial cells as
coccoid bacteria. Also, the excessive acidification by normal lactobacilli may cause lysis of epithelial cells, leaving
bare nuclei behind. These must not be confused with
leukocytes, which have approximately the same size.
Intermediate flora (lactobacillary grade II) comprised a
diminished lactobacillary flora that was mixed with other
bacteria. A mixed flora with lactobacilli still outnumbering the other bacteria was categorized as IIa; a more abnormal mixed flora with fewer lactobacilli than other
bacteria was labeled as IIb. Finally, abnormal flora (lactobacillary grade III) comprised numerous other bacteria
with no lactobacilli present.
This grading system was chosen because of its value in
874 Donders et al
April 2000
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Table I. Characteristics of vaginal fluid (pH, wet mount microscopy, and biochemical marker and cytokine concentrations) as a function of lactobacillary grade
pH (mean SD)
Lactate (mg/dL, geometric mean titer SD)
Succinate (mg/dL, geometric mean titer SD)
Succinate >1 mg/dL (No.)
Coccoid background (No.)
Lysis of epithelial cell (No.)
Parabasal cells (No.)
IL-8 (pg/mL, mean SD)
LIF (pg/mL, mean SD)
IL-1 (pg/mL, mean SD)
IL-1RA (pg/mL, mean SD)
Grade I
(n = 241)
Grade IIa
(n = 194)
Grade IIb
(n = 58)
Grade III
(n = 112)
Statistical
significance
4.5 0.5
126 2.5
1.2 2.9
123 (51%)
0 (0%)
81 (34%)
1 (0.4%)
2.2 5.2
53 162
127 367
91 81
4.8 0.7
110 2.6
1 3.6
86 (44%)
26 (13%)
36 (19%)
2 (1%)
4.5 9.1
39 71
243 512
84 85
5.6 0.8
56 2.4
0.95 3.5
23 (40%)
25 (45%)
1 (1.7%)
3 (5.2%)
6.9 11
42 56
821 1056
87 75
6.1 0.8
24 3.2
0.79 4.8
43 (38%)
60 (54%)
2 (1.8%)
9 (8.0%)
8.1 13
37 76
1033 1870
84 82
P < .0001
P < .0001
P = .0220
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
The t test was used for normally distributed analogous data, and the Welch test was used for data not normally distributed (unequal
variances). For discrete numbers the 2 test for trend was used or, when numbers were too low, lactobacillary grades I and IIa were compared with lactobacillary grades IIb and III by Fisher exact test.
Results
Lactobacillary grades were normal (lactobacillary
grade I) in 256 of 631 cases (40%), slightly disturbed
(lactobacillary grade IIa) in 201 (32%), moderately disturbed (lactobacillary grade IIb) in 58 (9%), and severely
disturbed (lactobacillary grade III) in 116 (18%). Vaginal
leukocytosis was <5 leukocytes per high-power field in 21
of 593 (3.5%), >10 leukocytes per high-power field but <5
leukocytes per epithelial cell in 381 (64%), 5 to 10 leukocytes per epithelial cell in 141 (25%), and more than 10
leukocytes per epithelial cell in 44 (7.4%).
With increasing lactobacillary grade (decreasing lactobacilli), pH increased from a mean of 4.5 to a mean of
6.1 (P < .0001 for trend; Table I), whereas lactate concentration decreased from a geometric mean titer of 126
mg/dL to a geometric mean titer of 24 mg/dL (P < .0001
for trend). IL-8 and IL-1 concentrations increased 4- to
10-fold with increasing lactobacillary grade (P < .0001),
but LIF and IL-1RA levels remained stable.
With increasing vaginal leukocytosis the pH and lactate
concentration curves showed a bimodal pattern. The pH
was 5.4 when no leukocytes were present, decreased to
4.9 in the group with moderate vaginal leukocytosis, and
increased to 5.9 when leukocytosis was excessive (Table
II). Lactate levels followed a similar bimodal pattern,
only reciprocal. The lactate concentration was low (45
mg/dL) when leukocytosis was low, fell within the reference range (87-89 mg/dL) when leukocytosis was intermediate, and was again low (59 mg/dL) when leukocytosis was extreme.
All the cytokines studied, including IL-1RA, showed a
tendency toward an increase in concentration as the degree of vaginal leukocytosis increased. IL-8 and LIF concentrations showed a steady rise up to the group with severe leukocytosis of >10 leukocytes per epithelial cell.
IL-1 and IL-1RA concentrations increased to maximum
levels in the group with moderate leukocytosis of 5 to 10
Donders et al 875
Table II. Characteristics of vaginal fluid (pH, wet mount microscopy, and biochemical marker and cytokine concentrations) as a function of vaginal leukocytosis
pH (mean SD)
Lactate (mg/dL, geometric mean titer SD)
Succinate (mg/dL, geometric mean titer SD)
Succinate >1 mg/dL (No.)
Coccoid background (No.)
Lysis of epithelial cells (No.)
Parabasal cells (No.)
IL-8 (pg/mL, mean SD)
LIF (pg/mL, mean SD)
IL-1(pg/mL, mean SD)
IL-1RA (pg/mL, mean SD)
5.4 1.0
45 2.5
1.25 4.4
10 (48%)
2 (9.5%)
2 (9.5%)
0 (0%)
2.9 7.1
15 7.7
93 744
67 58
4.9 0.8
87 3.6
1.0 3.46
86 (45%)
47 (12%)
100 (26%)
3 (1%)
3.3 7.4
36 90
260 587
89 87
5.9 1.0
59 2.7
10 5.13
18 (41%)
23 (52%)
0 (0%)
6 (14%)
8.2 12
96 111
243 683
49 51
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
P < .0001
P = .0036
P < .0001
P = .0040
Table III. Age-adjusted multiple regression analysis on relationship of IL-1, LIF, IL-8, and IL-1RA concentrations with
lactobacillary grade, vaginal leukocytosis, and positive vaginal culture result (any pathogen except Candida species)
IL-1
Vaginal leukocytosis
Lactobacillary grade
Positive vaginal
culture result
R2
Statistical
significance
0.22
0.26
0.23
0.7
1.9
0.3
P = .50
P = .06
P = .80
LIF
R2
0.06 0.8
0.04 2000
0.09 2.8
IL-8
Statistical
significance
P = .500
P = .040
P = .007
R2
0.09 0.4
0.08 100
0.13 2.4
IL-1RA
Statistical
significance
P = .700
P = .300
P = .018
R2
0.4 2.4
0.4 1.10
0.5 3.9
Statistical
significance
P = .0200
P = .3000
P = .0001
concentration showed a slight but significant negative correlation with lactobacillary grade (LIF decreased with increasing disruption of the vaginal flora). There was also a
strong positive correlation between LIF and vaginal colonization with pathogens (R2 = 0.09; P = .007) but not between LIF and vaginal leukocytosis.
IL-8 levels correlated with positive vaginal culture results (R2 = 0.13; P = .02) but showed no independent relationship with the lactobacillary grade. 1L-1RA concentration was positively associated with both vaginal
leukocytosis (R2 = 0.4; P = .02) and vaginal colonization
(R2 = 0.5; P = .0001).
Comment
This study demonstrated a good correlation between
lactobacillary grades and pH, lactate content, and increased cytokine production in the vagina. Lactobacillary
grade III corresponds to a complete disruption of the
normal lactobacillary resistance of the vagina, with no
lactobacillary morphotyes present on microscopic examination of the vaginal fluid. Although it is tempting to
equate lactobacillary grade III with bacterial vaginosis,
the two conditions should be seen as overlapping but separate markers of vaginal infectious disease.14 It has been
shown before that lactobacillary grade III flora may harbor a large number of aerobic organisms, organisms
876 Donders et al
April 2000
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Fig 1. Vaginal IL-1/IL-1RA ratio (open triangles) and concentrations of IL-1 (open bars), LIF (striped bars), and IL-1RA
(dotted bars) as function of lactobacillary (Lb) grade (A) and vaginal leukocytes (B). hpf, High-power field.
causing sexually transmitted diseases, and anaerobic organisms.2, 3, 17, 18 Grossly abnormal flora may lead either
to anaerobic bacterial vaginosis or to aerobic vaginitis.
We use the term aerobic vaginitis for a condition in which
disrupted vaginal flora has been replaced by pathogenic
aerobic microorganisms, usually Escherichia coli, group B
streptococci, or enterococci of intestinal origin, which
elicits a severe local immune response in the host as indicated by increased vaginal leukocytosis (unpublished observations).14, 19
In this study we used the wet mount of fresh vaginal
fluid as the diagnostic test of choice for lactobacillary
grade. Although the Papanicolaou test,1 the Gram stain,2
and probably many other techniques may be used, wet
mounting is at least as useful as the Gram stain.19, 20 The
close correlation between lactobacillary grade and vaginal lactate content and pH further indicates that wet
mount is an acceptable method to use for the assessment
of lactobacillary flora.21
As vaginal leukocytosis increased, the pH changed in a
manner different from that of the lactate concentration.
Both very high and very low vaginal leukocytosis levels
were associated with low lactate levels and high pH.
A probable explanation could be that a large number of
women in the group with low vaginal leukocytosis harbored bacterial vaginosis. Bacterial vaginosis is typically
devoid of vaginal host immune response but is associated
with decreased lactobacillary morphotypes and thus with
low lactate and high pH.
Cytokines are released from macrophages and possibly
also from the genital tissues in response to microbial invasion, which explains the rises in IL-8, LIF, and IL-1RA
concentrations associated with colonization. In multivariate analysis, however, positive vaginal culture results were
not associated with IL-1. With decreasing lactobacilli
both IL-1 and IL-8 concentrations increased, whereas
LIF and IR-1RA concentration remained unchanged. It
Donders et al 877
Fig 2. Schematic presentation of sequence of events in case of disruption of vaginal lactobacillary microflora. LBG,
Lactobacillary grade; IL-1b, IL-1; I-RA, IL-1RA.
1. Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbiol
1983;18:170-7.
2. Donders GG, De Wet GH, Hooft P, Desmyter J. Lactobacilli in
Papanicolaou smears, genital infections and pregnancy. Am J
Perinatol 1993;10:358-61.
3. Donders GG. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: screen and treat?
[editorial] Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;83:1-4.
4. McGregor JA, French JI, Jones W, Milligan K, McKinney PJ,
Patterson E, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with prematurity and vaginal fluid mucinase and sialidase: results of a controlled trial of topical clindamycin cream. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1994;170:1048-59.
5. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson, Morgan DJ, Ison C,
Pearson C. Abnormal bacterial colonization of the genital tract
and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ
1994;308:295-8.
6. Platz-Christensen JJ, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Thomsen P, Wiqvist N.
Endotoxin and interleukin-1 alpha in the cervical mucus and
vaginal fluid of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1161-6.
7. Martius J, Eschenbach DA. The role of bacterial vaginosis as a
cause of amniotic fluid infection, chorioamnionitis and prematurity: a review. Arch Obstet Gynecol 1990;247:1-13.
8. McDonald HM, OLoughlin JA, Jolley PT, Vigneswaran R,
McDonald PJ. Changes in vaginal flora during pregnancy and
association with preterm birth. J Infect Dis 1994;170:724-8.
9. Rosenstein IJ, Morgan DJ, Sheehan M, Lamont RF, TaylorRobinson D. Effect of topical clindamycin on bacterial vaginosis
during pregnancy [abstract]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;67:S43.
10. Carey JC, Klebanoff MA, Hauth JC, Hillier SL, Thom EA, Ernest
JM, et al. Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med 2000;342:534-40.
11. Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, DuBard MB, Copper
RL. Reduced incidence of preterm delivery with metronidazole
and erythromycin in women with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J
Med 1995;333:1732-6.
878 Donders et al
April 2000
Am J Obstet Gynecol
12. Dudley DJ, Trautman MS. Infection, inflammation and contractions: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of preterm
labor. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1994;12:263-72.
13. Larsson PG, Platz-Christensen JJ, Thejls H, Forsum U, Phlson
C. Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease after first-trimester
legal abortion in women with bacterial vaginosis after treatment
with metronidazole: a double-blind, randomized study. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:100-3.
14. Donders GG. Microscopy of bacterial flora on fresh vaginal
smears. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1999;7:126-7.
15. Schrder K. Zr pathogenese und Klinik des vaginalen
Vaginalbiocoenose auf sechs grundbilder. Zentralbl Gynekol
1921;45:1350-61.
16. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SA. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram
stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:297-301.
N THE MOVE?
Send us your new address at least six weeks ahead
Dont miss a single issue of the journal! To ensure prompt service when you change your address,
please photocopy and complete the form below.
Please send your change of address notification at least six weeks before your move to ensure continued service.
We regret we cannot guarantee replacement of issues missed due to late notification.
JOURNAL TITLE:
Fill in the title of the journal here.
OLD ADDRESS:
NEW ADDRESS:
Affix the address label from a recent issue of the journal here.
OR FAX TO:
314-432-1158
OR PHONE:
1-800-453-4351
Outside the U.S., call
314-453-4351