Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Billy Ray Carlisle, 418 F.2d 921, 10th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgments in two cases against Billy Ray Carlisle without oral argument. The appellate court reviewed the record and briefs submitted and concluded that the issues presented were without merit and too insubstantial to warrant oral argument. The district court's judgments were affirmed for the reasons outlined in its memorandum decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-01-05 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 418 F.2d 921 Docket: 587-69_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgments in two cases against Billy Ray Carlisle without oral argument. The appellate court reviewed the record and briefs submitted and concluded that the issues presented were without merit and too insubstantial to warrant oral argument. The district court's judgments were affirmed for the reasons outlined in its memorandum decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    United States v. Billy Ray Carlisle, 418 F.2d 921, 10th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgments in two cases against Billy Ray Carlisle without oral argument. The appellate court reviewed the record and briefs submitted and concluded that the issues presented were without merit and too insubstantial to warrant oral argument. The district court's judgments were affirmed for the reasons outlined in its memorandum decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    418 F.

    2d 921

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,


    v.
    Billy Ray CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 586-69.
    No. 587-69.

    United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.


    January 5, 1970.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Oklahoma; Frederick A. Daugherty, Judge.
    Appellant has filed briefs in both cases.
    John O. Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., has filed a brief in Case No. 586-69 for
    plaintiff.
    Before LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    On review of the record in these cases and the briefs of the parties submitted
    under Rule 10, we conclude that the appellate issues presented are without
    merit and so insubstantial as to not require oral argument. The judgments are
    therefore affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of the
    district court. 303 F.Supp. 627.

    You might also like