Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fisher v. O'Brien, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Chad Fisher's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Fisher, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling that denied his petition challenging his detention. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's judgment for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7095

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Chad Fisher's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Fisher, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling that denied his petition challenging his detention. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's judgment for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Fisher v. O'Brien, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Chad Fisher's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Fisher, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling that denied his petition challenging his detention. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's judgment for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7095

    CHAD S. FISHER,
    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    TERRY OBRIEN,
    Respondent Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Glen E. Conrad, District
    Judge. (7:08-cv-00569-GEC-MFU)

    Submitted:

    October 15, 2009

    Decided:

    October 21, 2009

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chad S. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Chad

    S.

    Fisher,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2006)

    petition.

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See Fisher v. OBrien, No. 7:08-cv-

    00569-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. May 15, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like