Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    David Rice filed a § 1983 complaint against the Fairfield County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The facts and legal contentions were adequately presented so further argument would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1495

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Rice filed a § 1983 complaint against the Fairfield County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The facts and legal contentions were adequately presented so further argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    David Rice v. Fairfield County Sheriff's Department, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Rice filed a § 1983 complaint against the Fairfield County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without oral argument, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The facts and legal contentions were adequately presented so further argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1495

    DAVID RICE,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    FAIRFIELD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (0:11-cv-00310-JFA)
    Submitted:

    August 25, 2011

    Decided:

    August 29, 2011

    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Rice, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David

    Rice

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the reccomendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Rice v.

    Fairfield Cnty. Sheriffs Dept, No. 0:11-cv-00310-JFA (D.S.C.


    Apr. 21, 2011).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like