Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Steven Lester filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Greenville County Courthouse which was denied without prejudice by the district court. Lester appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Lester's complaint for the reasons stated in its order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7791

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Lester filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Greenville County Courthouse which was denied without prejudice by the district court. Lester appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Lester's complaint for the reasons stated in its order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Lester filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Greenville County Courthouse which was denied without prejudice by the district court. Lester appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Lester's complaint for the reasons stated in its order. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7791

    STEVEN LESTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GREENVILLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (4:09-cv-01824-HFF)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 2010

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    KING,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    June 23, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven Lester, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven

    Lester

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    without

    complaint.
    error.

    prejudice

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, No.

    4:09-cv-01824-HFF (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like