Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Searcy v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without prejudice of Edgar Searcy's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6396

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without prejudice of Edgar Searcy's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Searcy v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without prejudice of Edgar Searcy's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6396

    EDGAR SEARCY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-00050-REP)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2009

    Decided:

    October 5, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2006) petition.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050-

    REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like