Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Merricks, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrell Merricks' motion to recall the mandate in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Additionally, the court denied Merricks' motion for a transcript to be provided at government expense. The court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7959

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrell Merricks' motion to recall the mandate in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Additionally, the court denied Merricks' motion for a transcript to be provided at government expense. The court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    22 views2 pages

    United States v. Merricks, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrell Merricks' motion to recall the mandate in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Additionally, the court denied Merricks' motion for a transcript to be provided at government expense. The court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7959

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DARRELL S. MERRICKS,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:06-cr-00419-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2010

    Decided:

    March 4, 2010

    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darrell S. Merricks, Appellant Pro Se.


    Edmund P. Power,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Darrell S. Merricks appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to recall the mandate.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Merricks, No. 1:06-cr-00419-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2009). We


    deny Merricks motion for transcript at government expense.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like