Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Darnell Freeman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reinstate his appeal of his criminal conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Freeman's motion to reinstate his appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7368

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Darnell Freeman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reinstate his appeal of his criminal conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Freeman's motion to reinstate his appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darnell Freeman appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reinstate his appeal of his criminal conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Freeman's motion to reinstate his appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7368

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DARNELL FREEMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CR-02-427)

    Submitted: February 16, 2006

    Decided: February 22, 2006

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darnell Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE


    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Darnell

    Freeman

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying his motion to reinstate his appeal.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Freeman, No. CR-02-427 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like