Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Terence Brown's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court found Brown's § 2255 motion was untimely. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7690

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Terence Brown's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court found Brown's § 2255 motion was untimely. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Terence Brown's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court found Brown's § 2255 motion was untimely. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7690

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TERENCE DAMISI BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-90-398-A, CA-98-1774-AM)

    Submitted:

    March 9, 2000

    Decided:

    March 16, 2000

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Terence Damisi Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Brett Alan Sagel, Special
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Terence Damisi Brown seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255
    (West Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-

    90-398-A; CA-98-1774-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1999). We dispense with


    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like