Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Claiborne, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dana J. Claiborne's motion to reduce his sentence. Claiborne had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court thus affirmed the lower court's denial of Claiborne's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Claiborne.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dana J. Claiborne's motion to reduce his sentence. Claiborne had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court thus affirmed the lower court's denial of Claiborne's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Claiborne.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Claiborne, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dana J. Claiborne's motion to reduce his sentence. Claiborne had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court thus affirmed the lower court's denial of Claiborne's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Claiborne.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6029

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DANA J. CLAIBORNE, a/k/a D,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:06-cr-00240-RLW-1)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2009

    Decided:

    May 5, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carolyn Virginia Grady, Assistant


    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
    Assistant United States Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Federal Public Defender,


    Angela Mastandrea-Miller,
    Richmond, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dana J. Claiborne appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Claiborne, No. 3:06-cr-00240-

    RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like